Cargando…

Effects of plastic antipecking devices on the production performance, beak length, and behavior in Chinese Wannan chickens

This study examined the effects of plastic antipecking devices (PAD) on the production performance, upper beak length, behavior, and plumage condition of a local Chinese chicken breed. Three hundred sixty 63-d-old Wannan chickens with intact beaks were randomly allocated into 3 groups. Birds were fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Junying, He, Xinxin, Wang, Zhicheng, Wang, Jiangxian, Chen, Hong, Su, Hu, Guo, Xing, Jiang, Runshen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7704998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33248587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.025
_version_ 1783616871224836096
author Li, Junying
He, Xinxin
Wang, Zhicheng
Wang, Jiangxian
Chen, Hong
Su, Hu
Guo, Xing
Jiang, Runshen
author_facet Li, Junying
He, Xinxin
Wang, Zhicheng
Wang, Jiangxian
Chen, Hong
Su, Hu
Guo, Xing
Jiang, Runshen
author_sort Li, Junying
collection PubMed
description This study examined the effects of plastic antipecking devices (PAD) on the production performance, upper beak length, behavior, and plumage condition of a local Chinese chicken breed. Three hundred sixty 63-d-old Wannan chickens with intact beaks were randomly allocated into 3 groups. Birds were fitted with the PAD at 63 d (PAD63d) and at 77 d of age (PAD77d). Control birds were not fitted with PAD. The results showed that there were no significant effects of PAD on the BW, carcass traits, and meat quality (P > 0.05). The mortality in the PAD63d and PAD77d groups was lower than that in the control group. Compared with those in the PAD77d and control groups, the feed conversion ratio (FCR) from 63 to 112 d of age was lower in the PAD63d group. The ADFI of birds from 63 to 112 d of age was lowest in birds in the PAD63d group, intermediate in birds in the PAD77d group, and highest in control birds (P < 0.05). Birds in the PAD63d and PAD77d groups showed a lower frequency of walking and running, a higher frequency of sleeping, and higher plumage scores of the back and tail than those of control birds (P < 0.05). Birds' daily walking steps in the PAD77d group decreased compared with that of birds in the control group (P < 0.05). The upper beak length at 91 d and 112 d of age was longest in birds in the PAD63d group and shortest in control birds (P < 0.05). Overall, PAD appeared to be effective at reducing mortality, FCR, overall activity, and plumage damage and increasing the upper beak length.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7704998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77049982020-12-08 Effects of plastic antipecking devices on the production performance, beak length, and behavior in Chinese Wannan chickens Li, Junying He, Xinxin Wang, Zhicheng Wang, Jiangxian Chen, Hong Su, Hu Guo, Xing Jiang, Runshen Poult Sci Management and Production This study examined the effects of plastic antipecking devices (PAD) on the production performance, upper beak length, behavior, and plumage condition of a local Chinese chicken breed. Three hundred sixty 63-d-old Wannan chickens with intact beaks were randomly allocated into 3 groups. Birds were fitted with the PAD at 63 d (PAD63d) and at 77 d of age (PAD77d). Control birds were not fitted with PAD. The results showed that there were no significant effects of PAD on the BW, carcass traits, and meat quality (P > 0.05). The mortality in the PAD63d and PAD77d groups was lower than that in the control group. Compared with those in the PAD77d and control groups, the feed conversion ratio (FCR) from 63 to 112 d of age was lower in the PAD63d group. The ADFI of birds from 63 to 112 d of age was lowest in birds in the PAD63d group, intermediate in birds in the PAD77d group, and highest in control birds (P < 0.05). Birds in the PAD63d and PAD77d groups showed a lower frequency of walking and running, a higher frequency of sleeping, and higher plumage scores of the back and tail than those of control birds (P < 0.05). Birds' daily walking steps in the PAD77d group decreased compared with that of birds in the control group (P < 0.05). The upper beak length at 91 d and 112 d of age was longest in birds in the PAD63d group and shortest in control birds (P < 0.05). Overall, PAD appeared to be effective at reducing mortality, FCR, overall activity, and plumage damage and increasing the upper beak length. Elsevier 2020-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7704998/ /pubmed/33248587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.025 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Poultry Science Association Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Management and Production
Li, Junying
He, Xinxin
Wang, Zhicheng
Wang, Jiangxian
Chen, Hong
Su, Hu
Guo, Xing
Jiang, Runshen
Effects of plastic antipecking devices on the production performance, beak length, and behavior in Chinese Wannan chickens
title Effects of plastic antipecking devices on the production performance, beak length, and behavior in Chinese Wannan chickens
title_full Effects of plastic antipecking devices on the production performance, beak length, and behavior in Chinese Wannan chickens
title_fullStr Effects of plastic antipecking devices on the production performance, beak length, and behavior in Chinese Wannan chickens
title_full_unstemmed Effects of plastic antipecking devices on the production performance, beak length, and behavior in Chinese Wannan chickens
title_short Effects of plastic antipecking devices on the production performance, beak length, and behavior in Chinese Wannan chickens
title_sort effects of plastic antipecking devices on the production performance, beak length, and behavior in chinese wannan chickens
topic Management and Production
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7704998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33248587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.025
work_keys_str_mv AT lijunying effectsofplasticantipeckingdevicesontheproductionperformancebeaklengthandbehaviorinchinesewannanchickens
AT hexinxin effectsofplasticantipeckingdevicesontheproductionperformancebeaklengthandbehaviorinchinesewannanchickens
AT wangzhicheng effectsofplasticantipeckingdevicesontheproductionperformancebeaklengthandbehaviorinchinesewannanchickens
AT wangjiangxian effectsofplasticantipeckingdevicesontheproductionperformancebeaklengthandbehaviorinchinesewannanchickens
AT chenhong effectsofplasticantipeckingdevicesontheproductionperformancebeaklengthandbehaviorinchinesewannanchickens
AT suhu effectsofplasticantipeckingdevicesontheproductionperformancebeaklengthandbehaviorinchinesewannanchickens
AT guoxing effectsofplasticantipeckingdevicesontheproductionperformancebeaklengthandbehaviorinchinesewannanchickens
AT jiangrunshen effectsofplasticantipeckingdevicesontheproductionperformancebeaklengthandbehaviorinchinesewannanchickens