Cargando…
Effects of methylsulfonylmethane and neutralizing anti–IL-10 antibody supplementation during a mild Eimeria challenge infection in broiler chickens
A 28-day experiment was conducted in broilers to study the effects of feeding methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) and IL-10–neutralizing antibody from dried egg product (DEP) on the growth performance, immune responsivity, oxidative stress parameters, and gut health outcomes during a mild infection with mix...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7705026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33248571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.046 |
_version_ | 1783616877712375808 |
---|---|
author | Rasheed, M. S. Abdul Tiwari, U.P. Jespersen, J.C. Bauer, L.L. Dilger, R.N. |
author_facet | Rasheed, M. S. Abdul Tiwari, U.P. Jespersen, J.C. Bauer, L.L. Dilger, R.N. |
author_sort | Rasheed, M. S. Abdul |
collection | PubMed |
description | A 28-day experiment was conducted in broilers to study the effects of feeding methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) and IL-10–neutralizing antibody from dried egg product (DEP) on the growth performance, immune responsivity, oxidative stress parameters, and gut health outcomes during a mild infection with mixed species of Eimeria. A total of 500 male Ross 308 chicks were allocated to five treatments: sham-inoculated (uninfected) chickens fed control diet (UCON), Eimeria-infected chickens fed control diet (ICON), and Eimeria-infected chickens fed control diet supplemented with 287 U/tonne of DEP (I-DEP), 0.4% MSM, or their combination (I-DEP-MSM), with 10 replicate cages of 10 birds per treatment. All infected groups received 1 mL of an oral inoculum containing Eimeria acervulina (10,000 oocysts), Eimeria maxima (5,000 oocysts), and Eimeria tenella (5,000 oocysts) on study days 7 and 14. Data were analyzed as a two-way ANOVA for all treatments including Eimeria-infected groups, in addition to a single degree of freedom contrast to compare uninfected and infected groups receiving the control diet. Mild Eimeria infection did not influence the growth performance in ICON compared with UCON at any time points. Overall (day 0–28) growth performance parameters were not influenced by either infection or dietary supplementation of MSM or DEP. However, birds in I-DEP-MSM showed improved ADG during study day 7 to 14 (i.e., 7 d after primary inoculation) indicating a beneficial effect immediately after Eimeria infection. Although MSM supplementation reduced thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (day 21 and 28), both MSM and DEP improved the total antioxidant capacity (day 21) in the plasma of infected birds. Histopathological outcomes were not influenced by treatments, and fecal oocyst output was higher in MSM- and DEP-supplemented groups than with ICON, indicating no beneficial effects. Similarly, expression of cecal inflammatory cytokines (IL-10, IL-1β, and interferon-γ) was not affected by MSM, DEP, or their combination. Overall, the current results suggest that both MSM and DEP supplementation may benefit birds during a mild Eimeria infection as indicated by improvements in ADG and oxidative stress outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7705026 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77050262020-12-08 Effects of methylsulfonylmethane and neutralizing anti–IL-10 antibody supplementation during a mild Eimeria challenge infection in broiler chickens Rasheed, M. S. Abdul Tiwari, U.P. Jespersen, J.C. Bauer, L.L. Dilger, R.N. Poult Sci Immunology, Health and Disease A 28-day experiment was conducted in broilers to study the effects of feeding methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) and IL-10–neutralizing antibody from dried egg product (DEP) on the growth performance, immune responsivity, oxidative stress parameters, and gut health outcomes during a mild infection with mixed species of Eimeria. A total of 500 male Ross 308 chicks were allocated to five treatments: sham-inoculated (uninfected) chickens fed control diet (UCON), Eimeria-infected chickens fed control diet (ICON), and Eimeria-infected chickens fed control diet supplemented with 287 U/tonne of DEP (I-DEP), 0.4% MSM, or their combination (I-DEP-MSM), with 10 replicate cages of 10 birds per treatment. All infected groups received 1 mL of an oral inoculum containing Eimeria acervulina (10,000 oocysts), Eimeria maxima (5,000 oocysts), and Eimeria tenella (5,000 oocysts) on study days 7 and 14. Data were analyzed as a two-way ANOVA for all treatments including Eimeria-infected groups, in addition to a single degree of freedom contrast to compare uninfected and infected groups receiving the control diet. Mild Eimeria infection did not influence the growth performance in ICON compared with UCON at any time points. Overall (day 0–28) growth performance parameters were not influenced by either infection or dietary supplementation of MSM or DEP. However, birds in I-DEP-MSM showed improved ADG during study day 7 to 14 (i.e., 7 d after primary inoculation) indicating a beneficial effect immediately after Eimeria infection. Although MSM supplementation reduced thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (day 21 and 28), both MSM and DEP improved the total antioxidant capacity (day 21) in the plasma of infected birds. Histopathological outcomes were not influenced by treatments, and fecal oocyst output was higher in MSM- and DEP-supplemented groups than with ICON, indicating no beneficial effects. Similarly, expression of cecal inflammatory cytokines (IL-10, IL-1β, and interferon-γ) was not affected by MSM, DEP, or their combination. Overall, the current results suggest that both MSM and DEP supplementation may benefit birds during a mild Eimeria infection as indicated by improvements in ADG and oxidative stress outcomes. Elsevier 2020-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7705026/ /pubmed/33248571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.046 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Poultry Science Association Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Immunology, Health and Disease Rasheed, M. S. Abdul Tiwari, U.P. Jespersen, J.C. Bauer, L.L. Dilger, R.N. Effects of methylsulfonylmethane and neutralizing anti–IL-10 antibody supplementation during a mild Eimeria challenge infection in broiler chickens |
title | Effects of methylsulfonylmethane and neutralizing anti–IL-10 antibody supplementation during a mild Eimeria challenge infection in broiler chickens |
title_full | Effects of methylsulfonylmethane and neutralizing anti–IL-10 antibody supplementation during a mild Eimeria challenge infection in broiler chickens |
title_fullStr | Effects of methylsulfonylmethane and neutralizing anti–IL-10 antibody supplementation during a mild Eimeria challenge infection in broiler chickens |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of methylsulfonylmethane and neutralizing anti–IL-10 antibody supplementation during a mild Eimeria challenge infection in broiler chickens |
title_short | Effects of methylsulfonylmethane and neutralizing anti–IL-10 antibody supplementation during a mild Eimeria challenge infection in broiler chickens |
title_sort | effects of methylsulfonylmethane and neutralizing anti–il-10 antibody supplementation during a mild eimeria challenge infection in broiler chickens |
topic | Immunology, Health and Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7705026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33248571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.046 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rasheedmsabdul effectsofmethylsulfonylmethaneandneutralizingantiil10antibodysupplementationduringamildeimeriachallengeinfectioninbroilerchickens AT tiwariup effectsofmethylsulfonylmethaneandneutralizingantiil10antibodysupplementationduringamildeimeriachallengeinfectioninbroilerchickens AT jespersenjc effectsofmethylsulfonylmethaneandneutralizingantiil10antibodysupplementationduringamildeimeriachallengeinfectioninbroilerchickens AT bauerll effectsofmethylsulfonylmethaneandneutralizingantiil10antibodysupplementationduringamildeimeriachallengeinfectioninbroilerchickens AT dilgerrn effectsofmethylsulfonylmethaneandneutralizingantiil10antibodysupplementationduringamildeimeriachallengeinfectioninbroilerchickens |