Cargando…

Effects of methylsulfonylmethane and neutralizing anti–IL-10 antibody supplementation during a mild Eimeria challenge infection in broiler chickens

A 28-day experiment was conducted in broilers to study the effects of feeding methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) and IL-10–neutralizing antibody from dried egg product (DEP) on the growth performance, immune responsivity, oxidative stress parameters, and gut health outcomes during a mild infection with mix...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rasheed, M. S. Abdul, Tiwari, U.P., Jespersen, J.C., Bauer, L.L., Dilger, R.N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7705026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33248571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.046
_version_ 1783616877712375808
author Rasheed, M. S. Abdul
Tiwari, U.P.
Jespersen, J.C.
Bauer, L.L.
Dilger, R.N.
author_facet Rasheed, M. S. Abdul
Tiwari, U.P.
Jespersen, J.C.
Bauer, L.L.
Dilger, R.N.
author_sort Rasheed, M. S. Abdul
collection PubMed
description A 28-day experiment was conducted in broilers to study the effects of feeding methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) and IL-10–neutralizing antibody from dried egg product (DEP) on the growth performance, immune responsivity, oxidative stress parameters, and gut health outcomes during a mild infection with mixed species of Eimeria. A total of 500 male Ross 308 chicks were allocated to five treatments: sham-inoculated (uninfected) chickens fed control diet (UCON), Eimeria-infected chickens fed control diet (ICON), and Eimeria-infected chickens fed control diet supplemented with 287 U/tonne of DEP (I-DEP), 0.4% MSM, or their combination (I-DEP-MSM), with 10 replicate cages of 10 birds per treatment. All infected groups received 1 mL of an oral inoculum containing Eimeria acervulina (10,000 oocysts), Eimeria maxima (5,000 oocysts), and Eimeria tenella (5,000 oocysts) on study days 7 and 14. Data were analyzed as a two-way ANOVA for all treatments including Eimeria-infected groups, in addition to a single degree of freedom contrast to compare uninfected and infected groups receiving the control diet. Mild Eimeria infection did not influence the growth performance in ICON compared with UCON at any time points. Overall (day 0–28) growth performance parameters were not influenced by either infection or dietary supplementation of MSM or DEP. However, birds in I-DEP-MSM showed improved ADG during study day 7 to 14 (i.e., 7 d after primary inoculation) indicating a beneficial effect immediately after Eimeria infection. Although MSM supplementation reduced thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (day 21 and 28), both MSM and DEP improved the total antioxidant capacity (day 21) in the plasma of infected birds. Histopathological outcomes were not influenced by treatments, and fecal oocyst output was higher in MSM- and DEP-supplemented groups than with ICON, indicating no beneficial effects. Similarly, expression of cecal inflammatory cytokines (IL-10, IL-1β, and interferon-γ) was not affected by MSM, DEP, or their combination. Overall, the current results suggest that both MSM and DEP supplementation may benefit birds during a mild Eimeria infection as indicated by improvements in ADG and oxidative stress outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7705026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77050262020-12-08 Effects of methylsulfonylmethane and neutralizing anti–IL-10 antibody supplementation during a mild Eimeria challenge infection in broiler chickens Rasheed, M. S. Abdul Tiwari, U.P. Jespersen, J.C. Bauer, L.L. Dilger, R.N. Poult Sci Immunology, Health and Disease A 28-day experiment was conducted in broilers to study the effects of feeding methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) and IL-10–neutralizing antibody from dried egg product (DEP) on the growth performance, immune responsivity, oxidative stress parameters, and gut health outcomes during a mild infection with mixed species of Eimeria. A total of 500 male Ross 308 chicks were allocated to five treatments: sham-inoculated (uninfected) chickens fed control diet (UCON), Eimeria-infected chickens fed control diet (ICON), and Eimeria-infected chickens fed control diet supplemented with 287 U/tonne of DEP (I-DEP), 0.4% MSM, or their combination (I-DEP-MSM), with 10 replicate cages of 10 birds per treatment. All infected groups received 1 mL of an oral inoculum containing Eimeria acervulina (10,000 oocysts), Eimeria maxima (5,000 oocysts), and Eimeria tenella (5,000 oocysts) on study days 7 and 14. Data were analyzed as a two-way ANOVA for all treatments including Eimeria-infected groups, in addition to a single degree of freedom contrast to compare uninfected and infected groups receiving the control diet. Mild Eimeria infection did not influence the growth performance in ICON compared with UCON at any time points. Overall (day 0–28) growth performance parameters were not influenced by either infection or dietary supplementation of MSM or DEP. However, birds in I-DEP-MSM showed improved ADG during study day 7 to 14 (i.e., 7 d after primary inoculation) indicating a beneficial effect immediately after Eimeria infection. Although MSM supplementation reduced thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (day 21 and 28), both MSM and DEP improved the total antioxidant capacity (day 21) in the plasma of infected birds. Histopathological outcomes were not influenced by treatments, and fecal oocyst output was higher in MSM- and DEP-supplemented groups than with ICON, indicating no beneficial effects. Similarly, expression of cecal inflammatory cytokines (IL-10, IL-1β, and interferon-γ) was not affected by MSM, DEP, or their combination. Overall, the current results suggest that both MSM and DEP supplementation may benefit birds during a mild Eimeria infection as indicated by improvements in ADG and oxidative stress outcomes. Elsevier 2020-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7705026/ /pubmed/33248571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.046 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Poultry Science Association Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Immunology, Health and Disease
Rasheed, M. S. Abdul
Tiwari, U.P.
Jespersen, J.C.
Bauer, L.L.
Dilger, R.N.
Effects of methylsulfonylmethane and neutralizing anti–IL-10 antibody supplementation during a mild Eimeria challenge infection in broiler chickens
title Effects of methylsulfonylmethane and neutralizing anti–IL-10 antibody supplementation during a mild Eimeria challenge infection in broiler chickens
title_full Effects of methylsulfonylmethane and neutralizing anti–IL-10 antibody supplementation during a mild Eimeria challenge infection in broiler chickens
title_fullStr Effects of methylsulfonylmethane and neutralizing anti–IL-10 antibody supplementation during a mild Eimeria challenge infection in broiler chickens
title_full_unstemmed Effects of methylsulfonylmethane and neutralizing anti–IL-10 antibody supplementation during a mild Eimeria challenge infection in broiler chickens
title_short Effects of methylsulfonylmethane and neutralizing anti–IL-10 antibody supplementation during a mild Eimeria challenge infection in broiler chickens
title_sort effects of methylsulfonylmethane and neutralizing anti–il-10 antibody supplementation during a mild eimeria challenge infection in broiler chickens
topic Immunology, Health and Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7705026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33248571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.046
work_keys_str_mv AT rasheedmsabdul effectsofmethylsulfonylmethaneandneutralizingantiil10antibodysupplementationduringamildeimeriachallengeinfectioninbroilerchickens
AT tiwariup effectsofmethylsulfonylmethaneandneutralizingantiil10antibodysupplementationduringamildeimeriachallengeinfectioninbroilerchickens
AT jespersenjc effectsofmethylsulfonylmethaneandneutralizingantiil10antibodysupplementationduringamildeimeriachallengeinfectioninbroilerchickens
AT bauerll effectsofmethylsulfonylmethaneandneutralizingantiil10antibodysupplementationduringamildeimeriachallengeinfectioninbroilerchickens
AT dilgerrn effectsofmethylsulfonylmethaneandneutralizingantiil10antibodysupplementationduringamildeimeriachallengeinfectioninbroilerchickens