Cargando…

Re-evaluation of Diadenosine Tetraphosphate (Ap(4)A) From a Stress Metabolite to Bona Fide Secondary Messenger

Cellular homeostasis requires adaption to environmental stress. In response to various environmental and genotoxic stresses, all cells produce dinucleoside polyphosphates (Np(n)Ns), the best studied of which is diadenosine tetraphosphate (Ap(4)A). Despite intensive investigation, the precise biologi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferguson, Freya, McLennan, Alexander G., Urbaniak, Michael D., Jones, Nigel J., Copeland, Nikki A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7705103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33282915
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2020.606807
_version_ 1783616895816040448
author Ferguson, Freya
McLennan, Alexander G.
Urbaniak, Michael D.
Jones, Nigel J.
Copeland, Nikki A.
author_facet Ferguson, Freya
McLennan, Alexander G.
Urbaniak, Michael D.
Jones, Nigel J.
Copeland, Nikki A.
author_sort Ferguson, Freya
collection PubMed
description Cellular homeostasis requires adaption to environmental stress. In response to various environmental and genotoxic stresses, all cells produce dinucleoside polyphosphates (Np(n)Ns), the best studied of which is diadenosine tetraphosphate (Ap(4)A). Despite intensive investigation, the precise biological roles of these molecules have remained elusive. However, recent studies have elucidated distinct and specific signaling mechanisms for these nucleotides in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. This review summarizes these key discoveries and describes the mechanisms of Ap(4)A and Ap(4)N synthesis, the mediators of the cellular responses to increased intracellular levels of these molecules and the hydrolytic mechanisms required to maintain low levels in the absence of stress. The intracellular responses to dinucleotide accumulation are evaluated in the context of the “friend” and “foe” scenarios. The “friend (or alarmone) hypothesis” suggests that Ap(n)N act as bona fide secondary messengers mediating responses to stress. In contrast, the “foe” hypothesis proposes that Ap(n)N and other Np(n)N are produced by non-canonical enzymatic synthesis as a result of physiological and environmental stress in critically damaged cells but do not actively regulate mitigating signaling pathways. In addition, we will discuss potential target proteins, and critically assess new evidence supporting roles for Ap(n)N in the regulation of gene expression, immune responses, DNA replication and DNA repair. The recent advances in the field have generated great interest as they have for the first time revealed some of the molecular mechanisms that mediate cellular responses to Ap(n)N. Finally, areas for future research are discussed with possible but unproven roles for intracellular Ap(n)N to encourage further research into the signaling networks that are regulated by these nucleotides.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7705103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77051032020-12-03 Re-evaluation of Diadenosine Tetraphosphate (Ap(4)A) From a Stress Metabolite to Bona Fide Secondary Messenger Ferguson, Freya McLennan, Alexander G. Urbaniak, Michael D. Jones, Nigel J. Copeland, Nikki A. Front Mol Biosci Molecular Biosciences Cellular homeostasis requires adaption to environmental stress. In response to various environmental and genotoxic stresses, all cells produce dinucleoside polyphosphates (Np(n)Ns), the best studied of which is diadenosine tetraphosphate (Ap(4)A). Despite intensive investigation, the precise biological roles of these molecules have remained elusive. However, recent studies have elucidated distinct and specific signaling mechanisms for these nucleotides in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. This review summarizes these key discoveries and describes the mechanisms of Ap(4)A and Ap(4)N synthesis, the mediators of the cellular responses to increased intracellular levels of these molecules and the hydrolytic mechanisms required to maintain low levels in the absence of stress. The intracellular responses to dinucleotide accumulation are evaluated in the context of the “friend” and “foe” scenarios. The “friend (or alarmone) hypothesis” suggests that Ap(n)N act as bona fide secondary messengers mediating responses to stress. In contrast, the “foe” hypothesis proposes that Ap(n)N and other Np(n)N are produced by non-canonical enzymatic synthesis as a result of physiological and environmental stress in critically damaged cells but do not actively regulate mitigating signaling pathways. In addition, we will discuss potential target proteins, and critically assess new evidence supporting roles for Ap(n)N in the regulation of gene expression, immune responses, DNA replication and DNA repair. The recent advances in the field have generated great interest as they have for the first time revealed some of the molecular mechanisms that mediate cellular responses to Ap(n)N. Finally, areas for future research are discussed with possible but unproven roles for intracellular Ap(n)N to encourage further research into the signaling networks that are regulated by these nucleotides. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7705103/ /pubmed/33282915 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2020.606807 Text en Copyright © 2020 Ferguson, McLennan, Urbaniak, Jones and Copeland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Molecular Biosciences
Ferguson, Freya
McLennan, Alexander G.
Urbaniak, Michael D.
Jones, Nigel J.
Copeland, Nikki A.
Re-evaluation of Diadenosine Tetraphosphate (Ap(4)A) From a Stress Metabolite to Bona Fide Secondary Messenger
title Re-evaluation of Diadenosine Tetraphosphate (Ap(4)A) From a Stress Metabolite to Bona Fide Secondary Messenger
title_full Re-evaluation of Diadenosine Tetraphosphate (Ap(4)A) From a Stress Metabolite to Bona Fide Secondary Messenger
title_fullStr Re-evaluation of Diadenosine Tetraphosphate (Ap(4)A) From a Stress Metabolite to Bona Fide Secondary Messenger
title_full_unstemmed Re-evaluation of Diadenosine Tetraphosphate (Ap(4)A) From a Stress Metabolite to Bona Fide Secondary Messenger
title_short Re-evaluation of Diadenosine Tetraphosphate (Ap(4)A) From a Stress Metabolite to Bona Fide Secondary Messenger
title_sort re-evaluation of diadenosine tetraphosphate (ap(4)a) from a stress metabolite to bona fide secondary messenger
topic Molecular Biosciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7705103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33282915
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2020.606807
work_keys_str_mv AT fergusonfreya reevaluationofdiadenosinetetraphosphateap4afromastressmetabolitetobonafidesecondarymessenger
AT mclennanalexanderg reevaluationofdiadenosinetetraphosphateap4afromastressmetabolitetobonafidesecondarymessenger
AT urbaniakmichaeld reevaluationofdiadenosinetetraphosphateap4afromastressmetabolitetobonafidesecondarymessenger
AT jonesnigelj reevaluationofdiadenosinetetraphosphateap4afromastressmetabolitetobonafidesecondarymessenger
AT copelandnikkia reevaluationofdiadenosinetetraphosphateap4afromastressmetabolitetobonafidesecondarymessenger