Cargando…

Discordance Between Stimulated and Spontaneous Growth Hormone Levels in Short Children Is Dependent on Cut-Off Level and Partly Explained by Refractoriness

BACKGROUND: A growth hormone (GH) stimulation test is the recommended method for evaluating GH levels in children with possible GH deficiency (GHD). However, serial measurements of nocturnal spontaneous GH secretion are also performed. Divergent results from these tests have been reported, but with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lennartsson, Otto, Nilsson, Ola, Lodefalk, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7705110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33281744
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.584906
_version_ 1783616897213792256
author Lennartsson, Otto
Nilsson, Ola
Lodefalk, Maria
author_facet Lennartsson, Otto
Nilsson, Ola
Lodefalk, Maria
author_sort Lennartsson, Otto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A growth hormone (GH) stimulation test is the recommended method for evaluating GH levels in children with possible GH deficiency (GHD). However, serial measurements of nocturnal spontaneous GH secretion are also performed. Divergent results from these tests have been reported, but with variable frequencies. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether performing one or two GH tests is associated with the probability to diagnose a child with GHD; the frequency of divergent results in the arginine-insulin tolerance test (AITT) and the nocturnal spontaneous test using different cut-off levels, and whether refractoriness may explain some of the discordance. METHODS: In a population-based setting, the medical records of all short children evaluated for possible GHD during January 1993–February 2017 were reviewed. Twenty-one patients had been evaluated with one GH test only and 102 children had been evaluated with a spontaneous nocturnal GH test followed immediately by a complete AITT. Divergent results were defined as having a pathological response on only one of the tests when using 3, 5, 7, and 10 µg/L as cut-offs for peak GH on both tests, 1.1 and 3.3 µg/L for mean nocturnal values and receiver operating characteristic curves-derived cut-offs for nocturnal values. RESULTS: Children evaluated with one test only were more often diagnosed with GHD compared with children evaluated with both tests (48 vs. 19%, p = 0.019). Divergent results were found in 6–42% of the patients, with higher frequencies seen when higher cut-offs were applied. A higher proportion of patients with stimulated peak values ≤ 7 and ≤ 5 µg/L had a spontaneous peak within 2 h before the start of the AITT compared with patients with higher stimulated peak values (68 vs. 45%, p = 0.026, and 77 vs. 48%, p = 0.033, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Divergent results between AITT and nocturnal spontaneous secretion are common in short children, dependent on the cut-offs applied and partly due to refractoriness. Performing both tests decreases the risk of over diagnosing GHD in short children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7705110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77051102020-12-03 Discordance Between Stimulated and Spontaneous Growth Hormone Levels in Short Children Is Dependent on Cut-Off Level and Partly Explained by Refractoriness Lennartsson, Otto Nilsson, Ola Lodefalk, Maria Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology BACKGROUND: A growth hormone (GH) stimulation test is the recommended method for evaluating GH levels in children with possible GH deficiency (GHD). However, serial measurements of nocturnal spontaneous GH secretion are also performed. Divergent results from these tests have been reported, but with variable frequencies. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether performing one or two GH tests is associated with the probability to diagnose a child with GHD; the frequency of divergent results in the arginine-insulin tolerance test (AITT) and the nocturnal spontaneous test using different cut-off levels, and whether refractoriness may explain some of the discordance. METHODS: In a population-based setting, the medical records of all short children evaluated for possible GHD during January 1993–February 2017 were reviewed. Twenty-one patients had been evaluated with one GH test only and 102 children had been evaluated with a spontaneous nocturnal GH test followed immediately by a complete AITT. Divergent results were defined as having a pathological response on only one of the tests when using 3, 5, 7, and 10 µg/L as cut-offs for peak GH on both tests, 1.1 and 3.3 µg/L for mean nocturnal values and receiver operating characteristic curves-derived cut-offs for nocturnal values. RESULTS: Children evaluated with one test only were more often diagnosed with GHD compared with children evaluated with both tests (48 vs. 19%, p = 0.019). Divergent results were found in 6–42% of the patients, with higher frequencies seen when higher cut-offs were applied. A higher proportion of patients with stimulated peak values ≤ 7 and ≤ 5 µg/L had a spontaneous peak within 2 h before the start of the AITT compared with patients with higher stimulated peak values (68 vs. 45%, p = 0.026, and 77 vs. 48%, p = 0.033, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Divergent results between AITT and nocturnal spontaneous secretion are common in short children, dependent on the cut-offs applied and partly due to refractoriness. Performing both tests decreases the risk of over diagnosing GHD in short children. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7705110/ /pubmed/33281744 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.584906 Text en Copyright © 2020 Lennartsson, Nilsson and Lodefalk http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Lennartsson, Otto
Nilsson, Ola
Lodefalk, Maria
Discordance Between Stimulated and Spontaneous Growth Hormone Levels in Short Children Is Dependent on Cut-Off Level and Partly Explained by Refractoriness
title Discordance Between Stimulated and Spontaneous Growth Hormone Levels in Short Children Is Dependent on Cut-Off Level and Partly Explained by Refractoriness
title_full Discordance Between Stimulated and Spontaneous Growth Hormone Levels in Short Children Is Dependent on Cut-Off Level and Partly Explained by Refractoriness
title_fullStr Discordance Between Stimulated and Spontaneous Growth Hormone Levels in Short Children Is Dependent on Cut-Off Level and Partly Explained by Refractoriness
title_full_unstemmed Discordance Between Stimulated and Spontaneous Growth Hormone Levels in Short Children Is Dependent on Cut-Off Level and Partly Explained by Refractoriness
title_short Discordance Between Stimulated and Spontaneous Growth Hormone Levels in Short Children Is Dependent on Cut-Off Level and Partly Explained by Refractoriness
title_sort discordance between stimulated and spontaneous growth hormone levels in short children is dependent on cut-off level and partly explained by refractoriness
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7705110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33281744
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.584906
work_keys_str_mv AT lennartssonotto discordancebetweenstimulatedandspontaneousgrowthhormonelevelsinshortchildrenisdependentoncutofflevelandpartlyexplainedbyrefractoriness
AT nilssonola discordancebetweenstimulatedandspontaneousgrowthhormonelevelsinshortchildrenisdependentoncutofflevelandpartlyexplainedbyrefractoriness
AT lodefalkmaria discordancebetweenstimulatedandspontaneousgrowthhormonelevelsinshortchildrenisdependentoncutofflevelandpartlyexplainedbyrefractoriness