Cargando…

Retreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: A large proportion of patients eventually experience disease progression despite treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but subsequent treatment options are limited for this population. Retreatment with the same or different types of ICIs is a possible strategy, but the clin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Kaili, Li, Jiarui, Sun, Zhao, Zhao, Lin, Bai, Chunmei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7705192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835920975353
_version_ 1783616908445089792
author Yang, Kaili
Li, Jiarui
Sun, Zhao
Zhao, Lin
Bai, Chunmei
author_facet Yang, Kaili
Li, Jiarui
Sun, Zhao
Zhao, Lin
Bai, Chunmei
author_sort Yang, Kaili
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A large proportion of patients eventually experience disease progression despite treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but subsequent treatment options are limited for this population. Retreatment with the same or different types of ICIs is a possible strategy, but the clinical efficacy and safety data are limited. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICIs retreatment in patients with solid tumors after disease progression to previous ICIs. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and major meeting libraries for prospective studies. The primary outcomes included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median overall survival (mOS), and the incidence of grade ⩾3 immune-related adverse events (irAEs). RESULTS: We identified 22 prospective studies including 1865 patients. For disease progression after CTLA-4 inhibitors, three studies evaluated anti-CTLA-4 retreatment. The ORR was 12–23%, the DCR was 48.4–67.7%, and the mOS was 12 months. The incidence of grade ⩾3 irAEs was 5.9–25%. Four studies evaluated anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) retreatment. The ORR was 22–36%, the DCR was 40–64%, and the mOS was 13.4–20.6 months. The incidence of grade ⩾3 irAEs was <10%. For disease progression after PD-(L)1 inhibitors, 13 studies evaluated anti-PD-(L)1 retreatment. The ORR was 5–53%, the DCR was 38–83%, and the mOS was 13.9 months. The incidence of grade ⩾3 irAEs was 0–15% for patients retreated with single anti-PD-(L)1 agent, but was higher (0–64%) for those retreated with ICIs combined with other agents. Two studies evaluated anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) retreatment. The ORR was 0–22.4%, the DCR was 50–72%, and the mOS was 4–21 months. The incidence of grade ⩾3 irAEs was 26–61%. CONCLUSION: Retreatment with ICIs is feasible for cancer patients considering its encouraging efficacy and tolerable safety. Further prospective trials are needed to explore more promising strategies and identify suitable populations for retreatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7705192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77051922020-12-07 Retreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors: a systematic review Yang, Kaili Li, Jiarui Sun, Zhao Zhao, Lin Bai, Chunmei Ther Adv Med Oncol Systematic Review BACKGROUND: A large proportion of patients eventually experience disease progression despite treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but subsequent treatment options are limited for this population. Retreatment with the same or different types of ICIs is a possible strategy, but the clinical efficacy and safety data are limited. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICIs retreatment in patients with solid tumors after disease progression to previous ICIs. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and major meeting libraries for prospective studies. The primary outcomes included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median overall survival (mOS), and the incidence of grade ⩾3 immune-related adverse events (irAEs). RESULTS: We identified 22 prospective studies including 1865 patients. For disease progression after CTLA-4 inhibitors, three studies evaluated anti-CTLA-4 retreatment. The ORR was 12–23%, the DCR was 48.4–67.7%, and the mOS was 12 months. The incidence of grade ⩾3 irAEs was 5.9–25%. Four studies evaluated anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) retreatment. The ORR was 22–36%, the DCR was 40–64%, and the mOS was 13.4–20.6 months. The incidence of grade ⩾3 irAEs was <10%. For disease progression after PD-(L)1 inhibitors, 13 studies evaluated anti-PD-(L)1 retreatment. The ORR was 5–53%, the DCR was 38–83%, and the mOS was 13.9 months. The incidence of grade ⩾3 irAEs was 0–15% for patients retreated with single anti-PD-(L)1 agent, but was higher (0–64%) for those retreated with ICIs combined with other agents. Two studies evaluated anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) retreatment. The ORR was 0–22.4%, the DCR was 50–72%, and the mOS was 4–21 months. The incidence of grade ⩾3 irAEs was 26–61%. CONCLUSION: Retreatment with ICIs is feasible for cancer patients considering its encouraging efficacy and tolerable safety. Further prospective trials are needed to explore more promising strategies and identify suitable populations for retreatment. SAGE Publications 2020-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7705192/ /pubmed/33294036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835920975353 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Yang, Kaili
Li, Jiarui
Sun, Zhao
Zhao, Lin
Bai, Chunmei
Retreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors: a systematic review
title Retreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors: a systematic review
title_full Retreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors: a systematic review
title_fullStr Retreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Retreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors: a systematic review
title_short Retreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors: a systematic review
title_sort retreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7705192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835920975353
work_keys_str_mv AT yangkaili retreatmentwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsasystematicreview
AT lijiarui retreatmentwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsasystematicreview
AT sunzhao retreatmentwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsasystematicreview
AT zhaolin retreatmentwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsasystematicreview
AT baichunmei retreatmentwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinsolidtumorsasystematicreview