Cargando…

Simultaneous Measurement of Objective and Subjective Accommodation in Response to Step Stimulation

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate differences in objective and subjective accommodation dynamically and simultaneously. METHODS: Thirty-four pre-presbyopic healthy volunteers (mean age ± SD, 41.0 ± 3.2 years) participated in this study. Initially, the reaction time for detecting a change in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirota, Masakazu, Morimoto, Takeshi, Miyoshi, Tomomitsu, Fujikado, Takashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7705395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33252633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.61.13.38
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate differences in objective and subjective accommodation dynamically and simultaneously. METHODS: Thirty-four pre-presbyopic healthy volunteers (mean age ± SD, 41.0 ± 3.2 years) participated in this study. Initially, the reaction time for detecting a change in the target was measured at near. Dynamic accommodation was then monocularly recorded using an open-view Shack–Hartmann aberrometer and compared with the amplitude and velocity of subjective accommodation. RESULTS: The objective amplitude of accommodation (0.97 ± 0.32 diopter [D]) was significantly greater than the subjective amplitude of accommodation (0.62 ± 0.43 D; P < 0.001). The accommodative velocity was significantly faster for the “before the accommodation” response time (0.47 ± 0.38 D/s) than the “after the accommodation” response time (0.21 ± 0.22 D/s; P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The human eye under the monocular condition quickly adjusts to the focal plane to clearly archive the nearby object, and the focal plane thereafter is slowly and accurately adjusted to the visual target after visual recognition.