Cargando…

Diagnostic reasoning in internal medicine: a practical reappraisal

The practice of clinical medicine needs to be a very flexible discipline which can adapt promptly to continuously changing surrounding events. Despite the huge advances and progress made in recent decades, clinical reasoning to achieve an accurate diagnosis still seems to be the most appropriate and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Corazza, Gino Roberto, Lenti, Marco Vincenzo, Howdle, Peter David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7705414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33259033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11739-020-02580-0
_version_ 1783616951370645504
author Corazza, Gino Roberto
Lenti, Marco Vincenzo
Howdle, Peter David
author_facet Corazza, Gino Roberto
Lenti, Marco Vincenzo
Howdle, Peter David
author_sort Corazza, Gino Roberto
collection PubMed
description The practice of clinical medicine needs to be a very flexible discipline which can adapt promptly to continuously changing surrounding events. Despite the huge advances and progress made in recent decades, clinical reasoning to achieve an accurate diagnosis still seems to be the most appropriate and distinctive feature of clinical medicine. This is particularly evident in internal medicine where diagnostic boundaries are often blurred. Making a diagnosis is a multi-stage process which requires proper data collection, the formulation of an illness script and testing of the diagnostic hypothesis. To make sense of a number of variables, physicians may follow an analytical or an intuitive approach to clinical reasoning, depending on their personal experience and level of professionalism. Intuitive thinking is more typical of experienced physicians, but is not devoid of shortcomings. Particularly, the high risk of biases must be counteracted by de-biasing techniques, which require constant critical thinking. In this review, we discuss critically the current knowledge regarding diagnostic reasoning from an internal medicine perspective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7705414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77054142020-12-01 Diagnostic reasoning in internal medicine: a practical reappraisal Corazza, Gino Roberto Lenti, Marco Vincenzo Howdle, Peter David Intern Emerg Med Im - Review The practice of clinical medicine needs to be a very flexible discipline which can adapt promptly to continuously changing surrounding events. Despite the huge advances and progress made in recent decades, clinical reasoning to achieve an accurate diagnosis still seems to be the most appropriate and distinctive feature of clinical medicine. This is particularly evident in internal medicine where diagnostic boundaries are often blurred. Making a diagnosis is a multi-stage process which requires proper data collection, the formulation of an illness script and testing of the diagnostic hypothesis. To make sense of a number of variables, physicians may follow an analytical or an intuitive approach to clinical reasoning, depending on their personal experience and level of professionalism. Intuitive thinking is more typical of experienced physicians, but is not devoid of shortcomings. Particularly, the high risk of biases must be counteracted by de-biasing techniques, which require constant critical thinking. In this review, we discuss critically the current knowledge regarding diagnostic reasoning from an internal medicine perspective. Springer International Publishing 2020-12-01 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7705414/ /pubmed/33259033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11739-020-02580-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Im - Review
Corazza, Gino Roberto
Lenti, Marco Vincenzo
Howdle, Peter David
Diagnostic reasoning in internal medicine: a practical reappraisal
title Diagnostic reasoning in internal medicine: a practical reappraisal
title_full Diagnostic reasoning in internal medicine: a practical reappraisal
title_fullStr Diagnostic reasoning in internal medicine: a practical reappraisal
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic reasoning in internal medicine: a practical reappraisal
title_short Diagnostic reasoning in internal medicine: a practical reappraisal
title_sort diagnostic reasoning in internal medicine: a practical reappraisal
topic Im - Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7705414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33259033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11739-020-02580-0
work_keys_str_mv AT corazzaginoroberto diagnosticreasoningininternalmedicineapracticalreappraisal
AT lentimarcovincenzo diagnosticreasoningininternalmedicineapracticalreappraisal
AT howdlepeterdavid diagnosticreasoningininternalmedicineapracticalreappraisal