Cargando…
Heterogeneity in Danish lung choirs and their singing leaders: delivery, approach, and experiences: a survey-based study
OBJECTIVES: Singing is considered a beneficial leisure time intervention for people with respiratory diseases, and lung choirs have gained increasing attention. However, there is no available guideline on preferred methodology, and hence, outcomes, delivery, and benefits are unclear. The present stu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7705518/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33257493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041700 |
_version_ | 1783616970190487552 |
---|---|
author | Kaasgaard, Mette Andersen, Ingrid Charlotte Rasmussen, Daniel Bech Hilberg, Ole Løkke, Anders Vuust, Peter Bodtger, Uffe |
author_facet | Kaasgaard, Mette Andersen, Ingrid Charlotte Rasmussen, Daniel Bech Hilberg, Ole Løkke, Anders Vuust, Peter Bodtger, Uffe |
author_sort | Kaasgaard, Mette |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Singing is considered a beneficial leisure time intervention for people with respiratory diseases, and lung choirs have gained increasing attention. However, there is no available guideline on preferred methodology, and hence, outcomes, delivery, and benefits are unclear. The present study investigated for the first time ever emerged delivery, approach, and experiences in Danish lung choirs and their singing leaders, hypothesising the array to be heterogeneous, without disease-specific approach, and a challenging field to navigate for the singing leaders. SETTING: An online survey comprising 25 questions was performed individually, May 2017, in Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: Current singing leaders of Danish lung choirs, identified by hand searches on the internet. In total, 33 singing leaders in formal and informal settings were identified and 20 (67%) responded. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Distribution in content, delivery, and approach; level of disease-specific knowledge and modification; experience of challenges and benefits. Quantitative variables were counted, and an inductive content analysis approach was used for the qualitative study component. RESULTS: The lung choirs were heterogeneous concerning setting, duration, and content. The approach was traditional without disease-specific content or physical activity. Most singing leaders held various academic degrees in music, but lacked skills in lung diseases. However, they experienced lung choirs as a highly meaningful activity, and reported that participants benefited both musically, psychosocially, and physically. Singing leaders were enthusiastic regarding potentials in the ‘arts-and-health’ cross-field and experienced an expansion of their role and overall purpose, professionally as well as personally. However, they also experienced insecurity, inadequacy, and isolation, and requested methodological guidelines, formal support, and peer network. CONCLUSION: Danish lung choirs are led without any disease-specific guideline or methodological approach. Further studies are needed to develop and distribute a preferred methodological approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study is linked to clinical trial number NCT03280355 and was performed prior to data collection and results of the clinical trial |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7705518 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77055182020-12-09 Heterogeneity in Danish lung choirs and their singing leaders: delivery, approach, and experiences: a survey-based study Kaasgaard, Mette Andersen, Ingrid Charlotte Rasmussen, Daniel Bech Hilberg, Ole Løkke, Anders Vuust, Peter Bodtger, Uffe BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine OBJECTIVES: Singing is considered a beneficial leisure time intervention for people with respiratory diseases, and lung choirs have gained increasing attention. However, there is no available guideline on preferred methodology, and hence, outcomes, delivery, and benefits are unclear. The present study investigated for the first time ever emerged delivery, approach, and experiences in Danish lung choirs and their singing leaders, hypothesising the array to be heterogeneous, without disease-specific approach, and a challenging field to navigate for the singing leaders. SETTING: An online survey comprising 25 questions was performed individually, May 2017, in Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: Current singing leaders of Danish lung choirs, identified by hand searches on the internet. In total, 33 singing leaders in formal and informal settings were identified and 20 (67%) responded. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Distribution in content, delivery, and approach; level of disease-specific knowledge and modification; experience of challenges and benefits. Quantitative variables were counted, and an inductive content analysis approach was used for the qualitative study component. RESULTS: The lung choirs were heterogeneous concerning setting, duration, and content. The approach was traditional without disease-specific content or physical activity. Most singing leaders held various academic degrees in music, but lacked skills in lung diseases. However, they experienced lung choirs as a highly meaningful activity, and reported that participants benefited both musically, psychosocially, and physically. Singing leaders were enthusiastic regarding potentials in the ‘arts-and-health’ cross-field and experienced an expansion of their role and overall purpose, professionally as well as personally. However, they also experienced insecurity, inadequacy, and isolation, and requested methodological guidelines, formal support, and peer network. CONCLUSION: Danish lung choirs are led without any disease-specific guideline or methodological approach. Further studies are needed to develop and distribute a preferred methodological approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study is linked to clinical trial number NCT03280355 and was performed prior to data collection and results of the clinical trial BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7705518/ /pubmed/33257493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041700 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Rehabilitation Medicine Kaasgaard, Mette Andersen, Ingrid Charlotte Rasmussen, Daniel Bech Hilberg, Ole Løkke, Anders Vuust, Peter Bodtger, Uffe Heterogeneity in Danish lung choirs and their singing leaders: delivery, approach, and experiences: a survey-based study |
title | Heterogeneity in Danish lung choirs and their singing leaders: delivery, approach, and experiences: a survey-based study |
title_full | Heterogeneity in Danish lung choirs and their singing leaders: delivery, approach, and experiences: a survey-based study |
title_fullStr | Heterogeneity in Danish lung choirs and their singing leaders: delivery, approach, and experiences: a survey-based study |
title_full_unstemmed | Heterogeneity in Danish lung choirs and their singing leaders: delivery, approach, and experiences: a survey-based study |
title_short | Heterogeneity in Danish lung choirs and their singing leaders: delivery, approach, and experiences: a survey-based study |
title_sort | heterogeneity in danish lung choirs and their singing leaders: delivery, approach, and experiences: a survey-based study |
topic | Rehabilitation Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7705518/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33257493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041700 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaasgaardmette heterogeneityindanishlungchoirsandtheirsingingleadersdeliveryapproachandexperiencesasurveybasedstudy AT anderseningridcharlotte heterogeneityindanishlungchoirsandtheirsingingleadersdeliveryapproachandexperiencesasurveybasedstudy AT rasmussendanielbech heterogeneityindanishlungchoirsandtheirsingingleadersdeliveryapproachandexperiencesasurveybasedstudy AT hilbergole heterogeneityindanishlungchoirsandtheirsingingleadersdeliveryapproachandexperiencesasurveybasedstudy AT løkkeanders heterogeneityindanishlungchoirsandtheirsingingleadersdeliveryapproachandexperiencesasurveybasedstudy AT vuustpeter heterogeneityindanishlungchoirsandtheirsingingleadersdeliveryapproachandexperiencesasurveybasedstudy AT bodtgeruffe heterogeneityindanishlungchoirsandtheirsingingleadersdeliveryapproachandexperiencesasurveybasedstudy |