Cargando…

Feasibility of reporting results of large randomised controlled trials to participants: experience from the Fluoxetine Or Control Under Supervision (FOCUS) trial

OBJECTIVES: Informing research participants of the results of studies in which they took part is viewed as an ethical imperative. However, there is little guidance in the literature about how to do this. The Fluoxetine Or Control Under Supervision trial randomised 3127 patients with a recent acute s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mead, Gillian, Dennis, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7705542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33257485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040492
_version_ 1783616972108333056
author Mead, Gillian
Dennis, Martin
author_facet Mead, Gillian
Dennis, Martin
author_sort Mead, Gillian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Informing research participants of the results of studies in which they took part is viewed as an ethical imperative. However, there is little guidance in the literature about how to do this. The Fluoxetine Or Control Under Supervision trial randomised 3127 patients with a recent acute stroke to 6 months of fluoxetine or placebo and was published in the Lancet on 5 December 2018. The trial team decided to inform the participants of the results at exactly the same time as the Lancet publication, and also whether they had been allocated fluoxetine or placebo. In this report, we describe how we informed participants of the results. DESIGN: In the 6-month and 12-month follow-up questionnaires, we invited participants to provide an email address if they wished to be informed of the results of the trial. We re-opened our trial telephone helpline between 5 December 2018 and 31 March 2019. SETTING: UK stroke services. PARTICIPANTS: 3127 participants were randomised. 2847 returned 6-month follow-up forms and 2703 returned 12-month follow-up forms; the remaining participants had died (380), withdrawn consent or did not respond. RESULTS: Of those returning follow-up questionnaires, a total of 1845 email addresses were provided and a further 50 people requested results to be sent by post. Results were sent to all email and postal addresses provided; 309 emails were returned unrecognised. Seventeen people replied, of whom three called the helpline and the rest responded by email. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to disseminate results of large trials to research participants, though only around 60% of those randomised wanted to receive the results. The system we developed was efficient and required very little resource, and could be replicated by trialists in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN83290762; Post-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7705542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77055422020-12-09 Feasibility of reporting results of large randomised controlled trials to participants: experience from the Fluoxetine Or Control Under Supervision (FOCUS) trial Mead, Gillian Dennis, Martin BMJ Open Communication OBJECTIVES: Informing research participants of the results of studies in which they took part is viewed as an ethical imperative. However, there is little guidance in the literature about how to do this. The Fluoxetine Or Control Under Supervision trial randomised 3127 patients with a recent acute stroke to 6 months of fluoxetine or placebo and was published in the Lancet on 5 December 2018. The trial team decided to inform the participants of the results at exactly the same time as the Lancet publication, and also whether they had been allocated fluoxetine or placebo. In this report, we describe how we informed participants of the results. DESIGN: In the 6-month and 12-month follow-up questionnaires, we invited participants to provide an email address if they wished to be informed of the results of the trial. We re-opened our trial telephone helpline between 5 December 2018 and 31 March 2019. SETTING: UK stroke services. PARTICIPANTS: 3127 participants were randomised. 2847 returned 6-month follow-up forms and 2703 returned 12-month follow-up forms; the remaining participants had died (380), withdrawn consent or did not respond. RESULTS: Of those returning follow-up questionnaires, a total of 1845 email addresses were provided and a further 50 people requested results to be sent by post. Results were sent to all email and postal addresses provided; 309 emails were returned unrecognised. Seventeen people replied, of whom three called the helpline and the rest responded by email. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to disseminate results of large trials to research participants, though only around 60% of those randomised wanted to receive the results. The system we developed was efficient and required very little resource, and could be replicated by trialists in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN83290762; Post-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7705542/ /pubmed/33257485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040492 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Communication
Mead, Gillian
Dennis, Martin
Feasibility of reporting results of large randomised controlled trials to participants: experience from the Fluoxetine Or Control Under Supervision (FOCUS) trial
title Feasibility of reporting results of large randomised controlled trials to participants: experience from the Fluoxetine Or Control Under Supervision (FOCUS) trial
title_full Feasibility of reporting results of large randomised controlled trials to participants: experience from the Fluoxetine Or Control Under Supervision (FOCUS) trial
title_fullStr Feasibility of reporting results of large randomised controlled trials to participants: experience from the Fluoxetine Or Control Under Supervision (FOCUS) trial
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of reporting results of large randomised controlled trials to participants: experience from the Fluoxetine Or Control Under Supervision (FOCUS) trial
title_short Feasibility of reporting results of large randomised controlled trials to participants: experience from the Fluoxetine Or Control Under Supervision (FOCUS) trial
title_sort feasibility of reporting results of large randomised controlled trials to participants: experience from the fluoxetine or control under supervision (focus) trial
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7705542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33257485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040492
work_keys_str_mv AT meadgillian feasibilityofreportingresultsoflargerandomisedcontrolledtrialstoparticipantsexperiencefromthefluoxetineorcontrolundersupervisionfocustrial
AT dennismartin feasibilityofreportingresultsoflargerandomisedcontrolledtrialstoparticipantsexperiencefromthefluoxetineorcontrolundersupervisionfocustrial
AT feasibilityofreportingresultsoflargerandomisedcontrolledtrialstoparticipantsexperiencefromthefluoxetineorcontrolundersupervisionfocustrial