Cargando…

Rapid evidence review of harm reduction interventions and messaging for people who inject drugs during pandemic events: implications for the ongoing COVID-19 response

BACKGROUND: People who inject drugs are at increased health risk in a pandemic due to their greater susceptibility to severe disease and as a consequence of the restrictions put in place to halt the spread of infection. Harm reduction (HR) services, which aim to reduce the negative effects of drug u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilkinson, Rebecca, Hines, Lindsey, Holland, Adam, Mandal, Sema, Phipps, Emily
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7705852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33261636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-020-00445-5
_version_ 1783617033518186496
author Wilkinson, Rebecca
Hines, Lindsey
Holland, Adam
Mandal, Sema
Phipps, Emily
author_facet Wilkinson, Rebecca
Hines, Lindsey
Holland, Adam
Mandal, Sema
Phipps, Emily
author_sort Wilkinson, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: People who inject drugs are at increased health risk in a pandemic due to their greater susceptibility to severe disease and as a consequence of the restrictions put in place to halt the spread of infection. Harm reduction (HR) services, which aim to reduce the negative effects of drug use on health, are likely to be diminished in a pandemic. However, innovative HR interventions and messaging may also develop in response to such a crisis. It is vital to understand the most effective ways to deliver HR in pandemic situations so that guidance can be provided for current and future disruptions to service provision. METHODS: A rapid evidence review was conducted with the aim of exploring what HR interventions and messaging are most effective during a pandemic-type situation. Ten health databases were systematically searched using terms relevant to the research aim. A search was also made of grey literature, including a targeted search of HR messaging from key national and service provider websites. RESULTS: In the initial search, 121 pieces of evidence were identified which, after screening and de-duplication, resulted in 60 for inclusion. The included evidence consists mainly of non-peer reviewed, pre-publication or expert opinion pieces. The rapid findings suggest that HR services should be deemed essential during a pandemic, with staff supported to work safely and social distancing adaptations implemented. Services should be encouraged to operate more flexibly; for instance, in deciding the amounts of take-home supplies of injecting equipment and medications. The evidence on HR communication was very limited but key messages on infection control, uncertain drug supply and accessing services were identified. CONCLUSIONS: This rapid evidence review identifies implications for national policy makers, commissioners and HR service providers. A person-centred rather than disease-centred approach to HR delivered by collaborating partners, as well as prioritizing tailored HR messaging, is recommended. Further research evaluating the delivery of HR services and messaging, particularly focusing on health inequalities, is urgently needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7705852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77058522020-12-01 Rapid evidence review of harm reduction interventions and messaging for people who inject drugs during pandemic events: implications for the ongoing COVID-19 response Wilkinson, Rebecca Hines, Lindsey Holland, Adam Mandal, Sema Phipps, Emily Harm Reduct J Research BACKGROUND: People who inject drugs are at increased health risk in a pandemic due to their greater susceptibility to severe disease and as a consequence of the restrictions put in place to halt the spread of infection. Harm reduction (HR) services, which aim to reduce the negative effects of drug use on health, are likely to be diminished in a pandemic. However, innovative HR interventions and messaging may also develop in response to such a crisis. It is vital to understand the most effective ways to deliver HR in pandemic situations so that guidance can be provided for current and future disruptions to service provision. METHODS: A rapid evidence review was conducted with the aim of exploring what HR interventions and messaging are most effective during a pandemic-type situation. Ten health databases were systematically searched using terms relevant to the research aim. A search was also made of grey literature, including a targeted search of HR messaging from key national and service provider websites. RESULTS: In the initial search, 121 pieces of evidence were identified which, after screening and de-duplication, resulted in 60 for inclusion. The included evidence consists mainly of non-peer reviewed, pre-publication or expert opinion pieces. The rapid findings suggest that HR services should be deemed essential during a pandemic, with staff supported to work safely and social distancing adaptations implemented. Services should be encouraged to operate more flexibly; for instance, in deciding the amounts of take-home supplies of injecting equipment and medications. The evidence on HR communication was very limited but key messages on infection control, uncertain drug supply and accessing services were identified. CONCLUSIONS: This rapid evidence review identifies implications for national policy makers, commissioners and HR service providers. A person-centred rather than disease-centred approach to HR delivered by collaborating partners, as well as prioritizing tailored HR messaging, is recommended. Further research evaluating the delivery of HR services and messaging, particularly focusing on health inequalities, is urgently needed. BioMed Central 2020-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7705852/ /pubmed/33261636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-020-00445-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wilkinson, Rebecca
Hines, Lindsey
Holland, Adam
Mandal, Sema
Phipps, Emily
Rapid evidence review of harm reduction interventions and messaging for people who inject drugs during pandemic events: implications for the ongoing COVID-19 response
title Rapid evidence review of harm reduction interventions and messaging for people who inject drugs during pandemic events: implications for the ongoing COVID-19 response
title_full Rapid evidence review of harm reduction interventions and messaging for people who inject drugs during pandemic events: implications for the ongoing COVID-19 response
title_fullStr Rapid evidence review of harm reduction interventions and messaging for people who inject drugs during pandemic events: implications for the ongoing COVID-19 response
title_full_unstemmed Rapid evidence review of harm reduction interventions and messaging for people who inject drugs during pandemic events: implications for the ongoing COVID-19 response
title_short Rapid evidence review of harm reduction interventions and messaging for people who inject drugs during pandemic events: implications for the ongoing COVID-19 response
title_sort rapid evidence review of harm reduction interventions and messaging for people who inject drugs during pandemic events: implications for the ongoing covid-19 response
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7705852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33261636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-020-00445-5
work_keys_str_mv AT wilkinsonrebecca rapidevidencereviewofharmreductioninterventionsandmessagingforpeoplewhoinjectdrugsduringpandemiceventsimplicationsfortheongoingcovid19response
AT hineslindsey rapidevidencereviewofharmreductioninterventionsandmessagingforpeoplewhoinjectdrugsduringpandemiceventsimplicationsfortheongoingcovid19response
AT hollandadam rapidevidencereviewofharmreductioninterventionsandmessagingforpeoplewhoinjectdrugsduringpandemiceventsimplicationsfortheongoingcovid19response
AT mandalsema rapidevidencereviewofharmreductioninterventionsandmessagingforpeoplewhoinjectdrugsduringpandemiceventsimplicationsfortheongoingcovid19response
AT phippsemily rapidevidencereviewofharmreductioninterventionsandmessagingforpeoplewhoinjectdrugsduringpandemiceventsimplicationsfortheongoingcovid19response