Cargando…

Rasch analysis of the long-term conditions questionnaire (LTCQ) and development of a short-form (LTCQ-8)

BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the structural validity of the 20-item long-term conditions questionnaire (LTCQ) and to explore a potential short-form version of the scale using Rasch analysis. METHODS: Data were collected through postal surveys (February 2016–January 2017)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Batchelder, Laurie, Fox, Diane, Potter, Caroline M., Peters, Michele, Jones, Karen, Forder, Julien E., Fitzpatrick, Ray
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7706038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01626-3
_version_ 1783617070538162176
author Batchelder, Laurie
Fox, Diane
Potter, Caroline M.
Peters, Michele
Jones, Karen
Forder, Julien E.
Fitzpatrick, Ray
author_facet Batchelder, Laurie
Fox, Diane
Potter, Caroline M.
Peters, Michele
Jones, Karen
Forder, Julien E.
Fitzpatrick, Ray
author_sort Batchelder, Laurie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the structural validity of the 20-item long-term conditions questionnaire (LTCQ) and to explore a potential short-form version of the scale using Rasch analysis. METHODS: Data were collected through postal surveys (February 2016–January 2017) from a sample of 1,211 participants diagnosed with at least one long-term condition (LTC). Identified participants were invited through either local authorities for a social care cohort (n = 294) or primary care practices for a health care cohort (n = 917). Participants were mailed a survey, including the LTCQ, demographic questions, a comorbidities measure, and other validated outcome measures. Respondents were invited to complete a follow-up survey including the LTCQ for assessment of reproducibility. RESULTS: The main assumptions of the Rasch model from the LTCQ were fulfilled, although infit and outfit indices indicated some items showed misfit. Misfitted items, items that did not have a preceding set or showed some local dependence were removed one at a time, with the remaining candidate items to form an 8-item short version, the LTCQ-8. The Rasch model for the LTCQ-8 explained 64% variance and had a reliability estimate greater than 0.80. Several items in the LTCQ showed uniform differential item function (DIF) in relation to the number of reported LTCs, age, cohort and type of LTCs, but fewer items exhibited DIF in the LTCQ-8. Spearman’s rho correlations between the LTCQ and the LTCQ-8 were strong across the total sample and various subgroups. Correlations between the LTCQ-8 and all reference measures were moderate to strong, and comparable to correlations found between the LTCQ and these measures. CONCLUSIONS: The LTCQ measures a unidimensional construct, and it is therefore acceptable to use a summed total score. The LTCQ-8 also met the assumption of unidimensionality and had comparable construct validity with the LTCQ. Additional validation is required in an independent sample.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7706038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77060382020-12-01 Rasch analysis of the long-term conditions questionnaire (LTCQ) and development of a short-form (LTCQ-8) Batchelder, Laurie Fox, Diane Potter, Caroline M. Peters, Michele Jones, Karen Forder, Julien E. Fitzpatrick, Ray Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the structural validity of the 20-item long-term conditions questionnaire (LTCQ) and to explore a potential short-form version of the scale using Rasch analysis. METHODS: Data were collected through postal surveys (February 2016–January 2017) from a sample of 1,211 participants diagnosed with at least one long-term condition (LTC). Identified participants were invited through either local authorities for a social care cohort (n = 294) or primary care practices for a health care cohort (n = 917). Participants were mailed a survey, including the LTCQ, demographic questions, a comorbidities measure, and other validated outcome measures. Respondents were invited to complete a follow-up survey including the LTCQ for assessment of reproducibility. RESULTS: The main assumptions of the Rasch model from the LTCQ were fulfilled, although infit and outfit indices indicated some items showed misfit. Misfitted items, items that did not have a preceding set or showed some local dependence were removed one at a time, with the remaining candidate items to form an 8-item short version, the LTCQ-8. The Rasch model for the LTCQ-8 explained 64% variance and had a reliability estimate greater than 0.80. Several items in the LTCQ showed uniform differential item function (DIF) in relation to the number of reported LTCs, age, cohort and type of LTCs, but fewer items exhibited DIF in the LTCQ-8. Spearman’s rho correlations between the LTCQ and the LTCQ-8 were strong across the total sample and various subgroups. Correlations between the LTCQ-8 and all reference measures were moderate to strong, and comparable to correlations found between the LTCQ and these measures. CONCLUSIONS: The LTCQ measures a unidimensional construct, and it is therefore acceptable to use a summed total score. The LTCQ-8 also met the assumption of unidimensionality and had comparable construct validity with the LTCQ. Additional validation is required in an independent sample. BioMed Central 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7706038/ /pubmed/33256754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01626-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Batchelder, Laurie
Fox, Diane
Potter, Caroline M.
Peters, Michele
Jones, Karen
Forder, Julien E.
Fitzpatrick, Ray
Rasch analysis of the long-term conditions questionnaire (LTCQ) and development of a short-form (LTCQ-8)
title Rasch analysis of the long-term conditions questionnaire (LTCQ) and development of a short-form (LTCQ-8)
title_full Rasch analysis of the long-term conditions questionnaire (LTCQ) and development of a short-form (LTCQ-8)
title_fullStr Rasch analysis of the long-term conditions questionnaire (LTCQ) and development of a short-form (LTCQ-8)
title_full_unstemmed Rasch analysis of the long-term conditions questionnaire (LTCQ) and development of a short-form (LTCQ-8)
title_short Rasch analysis of the long-term conditions questionnaire (LTCQ) and development of a short-form (LTCQ-8)
title_sort rasch analysis of the long-term conditions questionnaire (ltcq) and development of a short-form (ltcq-8)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7706038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01626-3
work_keys_str_mv AT batchelderlaurie raschanalysisofthelongtermconditionsquestionnaireltcqanddevelopmentofashortformltcq8
AT foxdiane raschanalysisofthelongtermconditionsquestionnaireltcqanddevelopmentofashortformltcq8
AT pottercarolinem raschanalysisofthelongtermconditionsquestionnaireltcqanddevelopmentofashortformltcq8
AT petersmichele raschanalysisofthelongtermconditionsquestionnaireltcqanddevelopmentofashortformltcq8
AT joneskaren raschanalysisofthelongtermconditionsquestionnaireltcqanddevelopmentofashortformltcq8
AT forderjuliene raschanalysisofthelongtermconditionsquestionnaireltcqanddevelopmentofashortformltcq8
AT fitzpatrickray raschanalysisofthelongtermconditionsquestionnaireltcqanddevelopmentofashortformltcq8