Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature

BACKGROUND: Preprint usage is growing rapidly in the life sciences; however, questions remain on the relative quality of preprints when compared to published articles. An objective dimension of quality that is readily measurable is completeness of reporting, as transparency can improve the reader’s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carneiro, Clarissa F. D., Queiroz, Victor G. S., Moulin, Thiago C., Carvalho, Carlos A. M., Haas, Clarissa B., Rayêe, Danielle, Henshall, David E., De-Souza, Evandro A., Amorim, Felippe E., Boos, Flávia Z., Guercio, Gerson D., Costa, Igor R., Hajdu, Karina L., van Egmond, Lieve, Modrák, Martin, Tan, Pedro B., Abdill, Richard J., Burgess, Steven J., Guerra, Sylvia F. S., Bortoluzzi, Vanessa T., Amaral, Olavo B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Research
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7706207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00101-3

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7706207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00101-3

Ejemplares similares