Cargando…

Test evaluation trials present different challenges for trial managers compared to intervention trials

INTRODUCTION: Test evaluation trials present different challenges for trial managers compared to intervention trials. There has been very little research on the management of test evaluation trials and how this impacts on trial success, in comparison with intervention trials. Evaluations of medical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rick, Caroline, Mallett, Sue, Brown, James, Ottridge, Ryan, Palmer, Andrew, Parker, Victoria, Priest, Lee, Deeks, Jonathan J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7706229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04861-7
_version_ 1783617110935601152
author Rick, Caroline
Mallett, Sue
Brown, James
Ottridge, Ryan
Palmer, Andrew
Parker, Victoria
Priest, Lee
Deeks, Jonathan J.
author_facet Rick, Caroline
Mallett, Sue
Brown, James
Ottridge, Ryan
Palmer, Andrew
Parker, Victoria
Priest, Lee
Deeks, Jonathan J.
author_sort Rick, Caroline
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Test evaluation trials present different challenges for trial managers compared to intervention trials. There has been very little research on the management of test evaluation trials and how this impacts on trial success, in comparison with intervention trials. Evaluations of medical tests present specific challenges, because they are a pivot point bridging the complexities of pathways prompting testing with treatment decision-making. We systematically explored key differences in the trial design and management of test evaluation trials compared to intervention trials at the different stages of study design and delivery. We identified challenges in test evaluation trials that were more pronounced than in intervention trials, based on experience from 10 test evaluation trials. METHODS: We formed a focus group of 7 trial managers and a statistician who had been involved in the day-to-day management of both test evaluation trials and intervention trials. We used discussion and content analysis to group challenges from 10 trials into a structured thematic format. The trials covered a range of medical conditions, diagnostic tests, clinical pathways and conditions including chronic kidney disease, chronic pelvic pain, colitis, detrusor over-activity, group B streptococcal colonisation, tuberculosis and colorectal, lung, ovarian and thyroid cancers. RESULTS: We identified 10 common themes underlying challenges that are more pronounced in test evaluation compared to intervention trials. We illustrate these themes with examples from 10 trials, including with 31 specific challenges we experienced. The themes were ethics/governance; accessing patient populations; recruitment; patient preference; test processes, clinical pathways and samples storage; uncertainty of diagnostic results; verifying diagnosis (reference standard); follow-up; adverse effects; and diagnostic impact. CONCLUSION: We present 10 common themes, including 31 challenges, in test evaluation trials that will be helpful to others designing and managing future test evaluation trials. Proactive identification of potential challenges at the design and planning stages of test evaluation trials will enable strategies to improve trial design and management that may be different from standard strategies used for intervention trials. Future work could extend this topic to include challenges for other trial stakeholders including participants, clinicians, statisticians and funders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: All trials reviewed in this project were registered and are provided in Table 1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7706229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77062292020-12-02 Test evaluation trials present different challenges for trial managers compared to intervention trials Rick, Caroline Mallett, Sue Brown, James Ottridge, Ryan Palmer, Andrew Parker, Victoria Priest, Lee Deeks, Jonathan J. Trials Methodology INTRODUCTION: Test evaluation trials present different challenges for trial managers compared to intervention trials. There has been very little research on the management of test evaluation trials and how this impacts on trial success, in comparison with intervention trials. Evaluations of medical tests present specific challenges, because they are a pivot point bridging the complexities of pathways prompting testing with treatment decision-making. We systematically explored key differences in the trial design and management of test evaluation trials compared to intervention trials at the different stages of study design and delivery. We identified challenges in test evaluation trials that were more pronounced than in intervention trials, based on experience from 10 test evaluation trials. METHODS: We formed a focus group of 7 trial managers and a statistician who had been involved in the day-to-day management of both test evaluation trials and intervention trials. We used discussion and content analysis to group challenges from 10 trials into a structured thematic format. The trials covered a range of medical conditions, diagnostic tests, clinical pathways and conditions including chronic kidney disease, chronic pelvic pain, colitis, detrusor over-activity, group B streptococcal colonisation, tuberculosis and colorectal, lung, ovarian and thyroid cancers. RESULTS: We identified 10 common themes underlying challenges that are more pronounced in test evaluation compared to intervention trials. We illustrate these themes with examples from 10 trials, including with 31 specific challenges we experienced. The themes were ethics/governance; accessing patient populations; recruitment; patient preference; test processes, clinical pathways and samples storage; uncertainty of diagnostic results; verifying diagnosis (reference standard); follow-up; adverse effects; and diagnostic impact. CONCLUSION: We present 10 common themes, including 31 challenges, in test evaluation trials that will be helpful to others designing and managing future test evaluation trials. Proactive identification of potential challenges at the design and planning stages of test evaluation trials will enable strategies to improve trial design and management that may be different from standard strategies used for intervention trials. Future work could extend this topic to include challenges for other trial stakeholders including participants, clinicians, statisticians and funders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: All trials reviewed in this project were registered and are provided in Table 1. BioMed Central 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7706229/ /pubmed/33256826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04861-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodology
Rick, Caroline
Mallett, Sue
Brown, James
Ottridge, Ryan
Palmer, Andrew
Parker, Victoria
Priest, Lee
Deeks, Jonathan J.
Test evaluation trials present different challenges for trial managers compared to intervention trials
title Test evaluation trials present different challenges for trial managers compared to intervention trials
title_full Test evaluation trials present different challenges for trial managers compared to intervention trials
title_fullStr Test evaluation trials present different challenges for trial managers compared to intervention trials
title_full_unstemmed Test evaluation trials present different challenges for trial managers compared to intervention trials
title_short Test evaluation trials present different challenges for trial managers compared to intervention trials
title_sort test evaluation trials present different challenges for trial managers compared to intervention trials
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7706229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04861-7
work_keys_str_mv AT rickcaroline testevaluationtrialspresentdifferentchallengesfortrialmanagerscomparedtointerventiontrials
AT mallettsue testevaluationtrialspresentdifferentchallengesfortrialmanagerscomparedtointerventiontrials
AT brownjames testevaluationtrialspresentdifferentchallengesfortrialmanagerscomparedtointerventiontrials
AT ottridgeryan testevaluationtrialspresentdifferentchallengesfortrialmanagerscomparedtointerventiontrials
AT palmerandrew testevaluationtrialspresentdifferentchallengesfortrialmanagerscomparedtointerventiontrials
AT parkervictoria testevaluationtrialspresentdifferentchallengesfortrialmanagerscomparedtointerventiontrials
AT priestlee testevaluationtrialspresentdifferentchallengesfortrialmanagerscomparedtointerventiontrials
AT deeksjonathanj testevaluationtrialspresentdifferentchallengesfortrialmanagerscomparedtointerventiontrials