Cargando…

Analysis of long-term oncological results of clinical versus pathological responses after neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Nonoperative management after neoadjuvant treatment in low rectal cancer enables organ preservation and avoids surgical morbidity. Our aim is to compare oncological outcomes in patients with clinical complete response in watch and wait strategy with those who received neoadjuvant therapy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coraglio, Mariana F., Eleta, Martin A., Kujaruk, Mirta R., Oviedo, Javier H., Roca, Enrique L., Masciangioli, Guillermo A., Mendez, Guillermo, Iseas, Ilma S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7706260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02094-1
_version_ 1783617118016634880
author Coraglio, Mariana F.
Eleta, Martin A.
Kujaruk, Mirta R.
Oviedo, Javier H.
Roca, Enrique L.
Masciangioli, Guillermo A.
Mendez, Guillermo
Iseas, Ilma S.
author_facet Coraglio, Mariana F.
Eleta, Martin A.
Kujaruk, Mirta R.
Oviedo, Javier H.
Roca, Enrique L.
Masciangioli, Guillermo A.
Mendez, Guillermo
Iseas, Ilma S.
author_sort Coraglio, Mariana F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nonoperative management after neoadjuvant treatment in low rectal cancer enables organ preservation and avoids surgical morbidity. Our aim is to compare oncological outcomes in patients with clinical complete response in watch and wait strategy with those who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery with a pathological complete response. METHODS: Patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment with clinical complete response in watch and wait approach (group 1, n = 26) and complete pathological responders (ypT0N0) after chemoradiotherapy and surgery (group 2, n = 22), between January 2011 and October 2018, were included retrospectively, and all of them evaluated and followed in a multidisciplinary team. A comparative analysis of local and distant recurrence rates and disease-free and overall survival between both groups was carried out. Statistical analysis was performed using log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards regression model, and Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: No differences were found between patient’s demographic characteristics in both groups. Group 1: distance from the anal verge mean 5 cm (r = 1–12), 10 (38%) stage III, and 7 (27%) circumferential resection margin involved. The median follow-up of 47 months (r = 6, a 108). Group 2: distance from the anal verge mean 7 cm (r = 2–12), 16 (72%) stage III, and 13 (59%) circumferential resection margin involved. The median follow-up 49.5 months (r = 3, a 112). Local recurrence: 2 patients in group 1 (8.3%) and 1 in group 2 (4.8%) (p = 0.6235). Distant recurrence: 1 patient in group 1 (3.8%) and 3 in group 2 (19.2%) (p = 0.2237). Disease-free survival: 87.9% in group 1, 80% in group 2 (p = 0.7546). Overall survival: 86% in group 1 and 85% in group 2 (p = 0.5367). CONCLUSION: Oncological results in operated patients with pathological complete response were similar to those in patients under a watch and wait strategy mediating a systematic and personalized evaluation. Surgery can safely be deferred in clinical complete responders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7706260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77062602020-12-02 Analysis of long-term oncological results of clinical versus pathological responses after neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer Coraglio, Mariana F. Eleta, Martin A. Kujaruk, Mirta R. Oviedo, Javier H. Roca, Enrique L. Masciangioli, Guillermo A. Mendez, Guillermo Iseas, Ilma S. World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Nonoperative management after neoadjuvant treatment in low rectal cancer enables organ preservation and avoids surgical morbidity. Our aim is to compare oncological outcomes in patients with clinical complete response in watch and wait strategy with those who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery with a pathological complete response. METHODS: Patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment with clinical complete response in watch and wait approach (group 1, n = 26) and complete pathological responders (ypT0N0) after chemoradiotherapy and surgery (group 2, n = 22), between January 2011 and October 2018, were included retrospectively, and all of them evaluated and followed in a multidisciplinary team. A comparative analysis of local and distant recurrence rates and disease-free and overall survival between both groups was carried out. Statistical analysis was performed using log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards regression model, and Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: No differences were found between patient’s demographic characteristics in both groups. Group 1: distance from the anal verge mean 5 cm (r = 1–12), 10 (38%) stage III, and 7 (27%) circumferential resection margin involved. The median follow-up of 47 months (r = 6, a 108). Group 2: distance from the anal verge mean 7 cm (r = 2–12), 16 (72%) stage III, and 13 (59%) circumferential resection margin involved. The median follow-up 49.5 months (r = 3, a 112). Local recurrence: 2 patients in group 1 (8.3%) and 1 in group 2 (4.8%) (p = 0.6235). Distant recurrence: 1 patient in group 1 (3.8%) and 3 in group 2 (19.2%) (p = 0.2237). Disease-free survival: 87.9% in group 1, 80% in group 2 (p = 0.7546). Overall survival: 86% in group 1 and 85% in group 2 (p = 0.5367). CONCLUSION: Oncological results in operated patients with pathological complete response were similar to those in patients under a watch and wait strategy mediating a systematic and personalized evaluation. Surgery can safely be deferred in clinical complete responders. BioMed Central 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7706260/ /pubmed/33256819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02094-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Coraglio, Mariana F.
Eleta, Martin A.
Kujaruk, Mirta R.
Oviedo, Javier H.
Roca, Enrique L.
Masciangioli, Guillermo A.
Mendez, Guillermo
Iseas, Ilma S.
Analysis of long-term oncological results of clinical versus pathological responses after neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer
title Analysis of long-term oncological results of clinical versus pathological responses after neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer
title_full Analysis of long-term oncological results of clinical versus pathological responses after neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer
title_fullStr Analysis of long-term oncological results of clinical versus pathological responses after neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of long-term oncological results of clinical versus pathological responses after neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer
title_short Analysis of long-term oncological results of clinical versus pathological responses after neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer
title_sort analysis of long-term oncological results of clinical versus pathological responses after neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7706260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02094-1
work_keys_str_mv AT coragliomarianaf analysisoflongtermoncologicalresultsofclinicalversuspathologicalresponsesafterneoadjuvanttreatmentinlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT eletamartina analysisoflongtermoncologicalresultsofclinicalversuspathologicalresponsesafterneoadjuvanttreatmentinlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT kujarukmirtar analysisoflongtermoncologicalresultsofclinicalversuspathologicalresponsesafterneoadjuvanttreatmentinlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT oviedojavierh analysisoflongtermoncologicalresultsofclinicalversuspathologicalresponsesafterneoadjuvanttreatmentinlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT rocaenriquel analysisoflongtermoncologicalresultsofclinicalversuspathologicalresponsesafterneoadjuvanttreatmentinlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT masciangioliguillermoa analysisoflongtermoncologicalresultsofclinicalversuspathologicalresponsesafterneoadjuvanttreatmentinlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT mendezguillermo analysisoflongtermoncologicalresultsofclinicalversuspathologicalresponsesafterneoadjuvanttreatmentinlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT iseasilmas analysisoflongtermoncologicalresultsofclinicalversuspathologicalresponsesafterneoadjuvanttreatmentinlocallyadvancedrectalcancer