Cargando…

Development and internal validation of risk prediction model of metabolic syndrome in oil workers

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome continues to rise sharply worldwide, seriously threatening people’s health. The optimal model can be used to identify people at high risk of metabolic syndrome as early as possible, to predict their risk, and to persuade them to change their adverse l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jie, Li, Chao, Li, Jing, Qin, Sheng, Liu, Chunlei, Wang, Jiaojiao, Chen, Zhe, Wu, Jianhui, Wang, Guoli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7706262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09921-w
_version_ 1783617118485348352
author Wang, Jie
Li, Chao
Li, Jing
Qin, Sheng
Liu, Chunlei
Wang, Jiaojiao
Chen, Zhe
Wu, Jianhui
Wang, Guoli
author_facet Wang, Jie
Li, Chao
Li, Jing
Qin, Sheng
Liu, Chunlei
Wang, Jiaojiao
Chen, Zhe
Wu, Jianhui
Wang, Guoli
author_sort Wang, Jie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome continues to rise sharply worldwide, seriously threatening people’s health. The optimal model can be used to identify people at high risk of metabolic syndrome as early as possible, to predict their risk, and to persuade them to change their adverse lifestyle so as to slow down and reduce the incidence of metabolic syndrome. METHODS: Design existing circumstances research. A total of 1468 workers from an oil company who participated in occupational health physical examination from April 2017 to October 2018 were included in this study. We established the Logistic regression model, the random forest model and the convolutional neural network model, and compared the prediction performance of the models according to the F1 score, sensitivity, accuracy and other indicators of the three models. RESULTS: The results showed that the accuracy of the three models was 82.49,95.98 and 92.03%, the sensitivity was 87.94,95.52 and 90.59%, the specificity was 74.54, 96.65 and 94.14%, the F1 score was 0.86,0.97 and 0.93, and the area under ROC curve was 0.88,0.96 and 0.92, respectively. The Brier score of the three models was 0.15, 0.08 and 0.12, Observed-expected ratio was 0.83, 0.97 and 1.13, and the Integrated Calibration Index was 0.075,0.073 and 0.074, respectively, and explained how the random forest model was used for individual disease risk score. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that the prediction performance of random forest model is better than other models, and the model has higher application value, which can better predict the risk of metabolic syndrome in oil workers, and provide corresponding theoretical basis for the health management of oil workers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-020-09921-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7706262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77062622020-12-02 Development and internal validation of risk prediction model of metabolic syndrome in oil workers Wang, Jie Li, Chao Li, Jing Qin, Sheng Liu, Chunlei Wang, Jiaojiao Chen, Zhe Wu, Jianhui Wang, Guoli BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome continues to rise sharply worldwide, seriously threatening people’s health. The optimal model can be used to identify people at high risk of metabolic syndrome as early as possible, to predict their risk, and to persuade them to change their adverse lifestyle so as to slow down and reduce the incidence of metabolic syndrome. METHODS: Design existing circumstances research. A total of 1468 workers from an oil company who participated in occupational health physical examination from April 2017 to October 2018 were included in this study. We established the Logistic regression model, the random forest model and the convolutional neural network model, and compared the prediction performance of the models according to the F1 score, sensitivity, accuracy and other indicators of the three models. RESULTS: The results showed that the accuracy of the three models was 82.49,95.98 and 92.03%, the sensitivity was 87.94,95.52 and 90.59%, the specificity was 74.54, 96.65 and 94.14%, the F1 score was 0.86,0.97 and 0.93, and the area under ROC curve was 0.88,0.96 and 0.92, respectively. The Brier score of the three models was 0.15, 0.08 and 0.12, Observed-expected ratio was 0.83, 0.97 and 1.13, and the Integrated Calibration Index was 0.075,0.073 and 0.074, respectively, and explained how the random forest model was used for individual disease risk score. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that the prediction performance of random forest model is better than other models, and the model has higher application value, which can better predict the risk of metabolic syndrome in oil workers, and provide corresponding theoretical basis for the health management of oil workers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-020-09921-w. BioMed Central 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7706262/ /pubmed/33256679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09921-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Jie
Li, Chao
Li, Jing
Qin, Sheng
Liu, Chunlei
Wang, Jiaojiao
Chen, Zhe
Wu, Jianhui
Wang, Guoli
Development and internal validation of risk prediction model of metabolic syndrome in oil workers
title Development and internal validation of risk prediction model of metabolic syndrome in oil workers
title_full Development and internal validation of risk prediction model of metabolic syndrome in oil workers
title_fullStr Development and internal validation of risk prediction model of metabolic syndrome in oil workers
title_full_unstemmed Development and internal validation of risk prediction model of metabolic syndrome in oil workers
title_short Development and internal validation of risk prediction model of metabolic syndrome in oil workers
title_sort development and internal validation of risk prediction model of metabolic syndrome in oil workers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7706262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09921-w
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjie developmentandinternalvalidationofriskpredictionmodelofmetabolicsyndromeinoilworkers
AT lichao developmentandinternalvalidationofriskpredictionmodelofmetabolicsyndromeinoilworkers
AT lijing developmentandinternalvalidationofriskpredictionmodelofmetabolicsyndromeinoilworkers
AT qinsheng developmentandinternalvalidationofriskpredictionmodelofmetabolicsyndromeinoilworkers
AT liuchunlei developmentandinternalvalidationofriskpredictionmodelofmetabolicsyndromeinoilworkers
AT wangjiaojiao developmentandinternalvalidationofriskpredictionmodelofmetabolicsyndromeinoilworkers
AT chenzhe developmentandinternalvalidationofriskpredictionmodelofmetabolicsyndromeinoilworkers
AT wujianhui developmentandinternalvalidationofriskpredictionmodelofmetabolicsyndromeinoilworkers
AT wangguoli developmentandinternalvalidationofriskpredictionmodelofmetabolicsyndromeinoilworkers