Cargando…
Development and internal validation of risk prediction model of metabolic syndrome in oil workers
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome continues to rise sharply worldwide, seriously threatening people’s health. The optimal model can be used to identify people at high risk of metabolic syndrome as early as possible, to predict their risk, and to persuade them to change their adverse l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7706262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09921-w |
_version_ | 1783617118485348352 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Jie Li, Chao Li, Jing Qin, Sheng Liu, Chunlei Wang, Jiaojiao Chen, Zhe Wu, Jianhui Wang, Guoli |
author_facet | Wang, Jie Li, Chao Li, Jing Qin, Sheng Liu, Chunlei Wang, Jiaojiao Chen, Zhe Wu, Jianhui Wang, Guoli |
author_sort | Wang, Jie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome continues to rise sharply worldwide, seriously threatening people’s health. The optimal model can be used to identify people at high risk of metabolic syndrome as early as possible, to predict their risk, and to persuade them to change their adverse lifestyle so as to slow down and reduce the incidence of metabolic syndrome. METHODS: Design existing circumstances research. A total of 1468 workers from an oil company who participated in occupational health physical examination from April 2017 to October 2018 were included in this study. We established the Logistic regression model, the random forest model and the convolutional neural network model, and compared the prediction performance of the models according to the F1 score, sensitivity, accuracy and other indicators of the three models. RESULTS: The results showed that the accuracy of the three models was 82.49,95.98 and 92.03%, the sensitivity was 87.94,95.52 and 90.59%, the specificity was 74.54, 96.65 and 94.14%, the F1 score was 0.86,0.97 and 0.93, and the area under ROC curve was 0.88,0.96 and 0.92, respectively. The Brier score of the three models was 0.15, 0.08 and 0.12, Observed-expected ratio was 0.83, 0.97 and 1.13, and the Integrated Calibration Index was 0.075,0.073 and 0.074, respectively, and explained how the random forest model was used for individual disease risk score. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that the prediction performance of random forest model is better than other models, and the model has higher application value, which can better predict the risk of metabolic syndrome in oil workers, and provide corresponding theoretical basis for the health management of oil workers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-020-09921-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7706262 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77062622020-12-02 Development and internal validation of risk prediction model of metabolic syndrome in oil workers Wang, Jie Li, Chao Li, Jing Qin, Sheng Liu, Chunlei Wang, Jiaojiao Chen, Zhe Wu, Jianhui Wang, Guoli BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome continues to rise sharply worldwide, seriously threatening people’s health. The optimal model can be used to identify people at high risk of metabolic syndrome as early as possible, to predict their risk, and to persuade them to change their adverse lifestyle so as to slow down and reduce the incidence of metabolic syndrome. METHODS: Design existing circumstances research. A total of 1468 workers from an oil company who participated in occupational health physical examination from April 2017 to October 2018 were included in this study. We established the Logistic regression model, the random forest model and the convolutional neural network model, and compared the prediction performance of the models according to the F1 score, sensitivity, accuracy and other indicators of the three models. RESULTS: The results showed that the accuracy of the three models was 82.49,95.98 and 92.03%, the sensitivity was 87.94,95.52 and 90.59%, the specificity was 74.54, 96.65 and 94.14%, the F1 score was 0.86,0.97 and 0.93, and the area under ROC curve was 0.88,0.96 and 0.92, respectively. The Brier score of the three models was 0.15, 0.08 and 0.12, Observed-expected ratio was 0.83, 0.97 and 1.13, and the Integrated Calibration Index was 0.075,0.073 and 0.074, respectively, and explained how the random forest model was used for individual disease risk score. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that the prediction performance of random forest model is better than other models, and the model has higher application value, which can better predict the risk of metabolic syndrome in oil workers, and provide corresponding theoretical basis for the health management of oil workers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-020-09921-w. BioMed Central 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7706262/ /pubmed/33256679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09921-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Jie Li, Chao Li, Jing Qin, Sheng Liu, Chunlei Wang, Jiaojiao Chen, Zhe Wu, Jianhui Wang, Guoli Development and internal validation of risk prediction model of metabolic syndrome in oil workers |
title | Development and internal validation of risk prediction model of metabolic syndrome in oil workers |
title_full | Development and internal validation of risk prediction model of metabolic syndrome in oil workers |
title_fullStr | Development and internal validation of risk prediction model of metabolic syndrome in oil workers |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and internal validation of risk prediction model of metabolic syndrome in oil workers |
title_short | Development and internal validation of risk prediction model of metabolic syndrome in oil workers |
title_sort | development and internal validation of risk prediction model of metabolic syndrome in oil workers |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7706262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09921-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangjie developmentandinternalvalidationofriskpredictionmodelofmetabolicsyndromeinoilworkers AT lichao developmentandinternalvalidationofriskpredictionmodelofmetabolicsyndromeinoilworkers AT lijing developmentandinternalvalidationofriskpredictionmodelofmetabolicsyndromeinoilworkers AT qinsheng developmentandinternalvalidationofriskpredictionmodelofmetabolicsyndromeinoilworkers AT liuchunlei developmentandinternalvalidationofriskpredictionmodelofmetabolicsyndromeinoilworkers AT wangjiaojiao developmentandinternalvalidationofriskpredictionmodelofmetabolicsyndromeinoilworkers AT chenzhe developmentandinternalvalidationofriskpredictionmodelofmetabolicsyndromeinoilworkers AT wujianhui developmentandinternalvalidationofriskpredictionmodelofmetabolicsyndromeinoilworkers AT wangguoli developmentandinternalvalidationofriskpredictionmodelofmetabolicsyndromeinoilworkers |