Cargando…

Proton vs photon: A model-based approach to patient selection for reduction of cardiac toxicity in locally advanced lung cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: To use a model-based approach to identify a sub-group of patients with locally advanced lung cancer who would benefit from proton therapy compared to photon therapy for reduction of cardiac toxicity. MATERIAL/METHODS: Volumetric modulated arc photon therapy (VMAT) and robust-optim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teoh, S., Fiorini, F., George, B., Vallis, K.A., Van den Heuvel, F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Scientific Publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7707354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31431365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2019.06.032
_version_ 1783617328519315456
author Teoh, S.
Fiorini, F.
George, B.
Vallis, K.A.
Van den Heuvel, F.
author_facet Teoh, S.
Fiorini, F.
George, B.
Vallis, K.A.
Van den Heuvel, F.
author_sort Teoh, S.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: To use a model-based approach to identify a sub-group of patients with locally advanced lung cancer who would benefit from proton therapy compared to photon therapy for reduction of cardiac toxicity. MATERIAL/METHODS: Volumetric modulated arc photon therapy (VMAT) and robust-optimised intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans were generated for twenty patients with locally advanced lung cancer to give a dose of 70 Gy (relative biological effectiveness (RBE)) in 35 fractions. Cases were selected to represent a range of anatomical locations of disease. Contouring, treatment planning and organs-at-risk constraints followed RTOG-1308 protocol. Whole heart and ub-structure doses were compared. Risk estimates of grade [Formula: see text] 3 cardiac toxicity were calculated based on normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models which incorporated dose metrics and patients baseline risk-factors (pre-existing heart disease (HD)). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in target coverage between VMAT and IMPT. IMPT delivered lower doses to the heart and cardiac substructures (mean, heart V5 and V30, P < .05). In VMAT plans, there were statistically significant positive correlations between heart dose and the thoracic vertebral level that corresponded to the most inferior limit of the disease. The median level at which the superior aspect of the heart contour began was the T7 vertebrae. There was a statistically significant difference in dose (mean, V5 and V30) to the heart and all substructures (except mean dose to left coronary artery and V30 to sino-atrial node) when disease overlapped with or was inferior to the T7 vertebrae. In the presence of pre-existing HD and disease overlapping with or inferior to the T7 vertebrae, the mean estimated relative risk reduction of grade [Formula: see text] 3 toxicities was 24–59%. CONCLUSION: IMPT is expected to reduce cardiac toxicity compared to VMAT by reducing dose to the heart and substructures. Patients with both pre-existing heart disease and tumour and nodal spread overlapping with or inferior to the T7 vertebrae are likely to benefit most from proton over photon therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7707354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier Scientific Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77073542020-12-08 Proton vs photon: A model-based approach to patient selection for reduction of cardiac toxicity in locally advanced lung cancer Teoh, S. Fiorini, F. George, B. Vallis, K.A. Van den Heuvel, F. Radiother Oncol Original Article PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: To use a model-based approach to identify a sub-group of patients with locally advanced lung cancer who would benefit from proton therapy compared to photon therapy for reduction of cardiac toxicity. MATERIAL/METHODS: Volumetric modulated arc photon therapy (VMAT) and robust-optimised intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans were generated for twenty patients with locally advanced lung cancer to give a dose of 70 Gy (relative biological effectiveness (RBE)) in 35 fractions. Cases were selected to represent a range of anatomical locations of disease. Contouring, treatment planning and organs-at-risk constraints followed RTOG-1308 protocol. Whole heart and ub-structure doses were compared. Risk estimates of grade [Formula: see text] 3 cardiac toxicity were calculated based on normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models which incorporated dose metrics and patients baseline risk-factors (pre-existing heart disease (HD)). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in target coverage between VMAT and IMPT. IMPT delivered lower doses to the heart and cardiac substructures (mean, heart V5 and V30, P < .05). In VMAT plans, there were statistically significant positive correlations between heart dose and the thoracic vertebral level that corresponded to the most inferior limit of the disease. The median level at which the superior aspect of the heart contour began was the T7 vertebrae. There was a statistically significant difference in dose (mean, V5 and V30) to the heart and all substructures (except mean dose to left coronary artery and V30 to sino-atrial node) when disease overlapped with or was inferior to the T7 vertebrae. In the presence of pre-existing HD and disease overlapping with or inferior to the T7 vertebrae, the mean estimated relative risk reduction of grade [Formula: see text] 3 toxicities was 24–59%. CONCLUSION: IMPT is expected to reduce cardiac toxicity compared to VMAT by reducing dose to the heart and substructures. Patients with both pre-existing heart disease and tumour and nodal spread overlapping with or inferior to the T7 vertebrae are likely to benefit most from proton over photon therapy. Elsevier Scientific Publishers 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7707354/ /pubmed/31431365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2019.06.032 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Teoh, S.
Fiorini, F.
George, B.
Vallis, K.A.
Van den Heuvel, F.
Proton vs photon: A model-based approach to patient selection for reduction of cardiac toxicity in locally advanced lung cancer
title Proton vs photon: A model-based approach to patient selection for reduction of cardiac toxicity in locally advanced lung cancer
title_full Proton vs photon: A model-based approach to patient selection for reduction of cardiac toxicity in locally advanced lung cancer
title_fullStr Proton vs photon: A model-based approach to patient selection for reduction of cardiac toxicity in locally advanced lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Proton vs photon: A model-based approach to patient selection for reduction of cardiac toxicity in locally advanced lung cancer
title_short Proton vs photon: A model-based approach to patient selection for reduction of cardiac toxicity in locally advanced lung cancer
title_sort proton vs photon: a model-based approach to patient selection for reduction of cardiac toxicity in locally advanced lung cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7707354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31431365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2019.06.032
work_keys_str_mv AT teohs protonvsphotonamodelbasedapproachtopatientselectionforreductionofcardiactoxicityinlocallyadvancedlungcancer
AT fiorinif protonvsphotonamodelbasedapproachtopatientselectionforreductionofcardiactoxicityinlocallyadvancedlungcancer
AT georgeb protonvsphotonamodelbasedapproachtopatientselectionforreductionofcardiactoxicityinlocallyadvancedlungcancer
AT valliska protonvsphotonamodelbasedapproachtopatientselectionforreductionofcardiactoxicityinlocallyadvancedlungcancer
AT vandenheuvelf protonvsphotonamodelbasedapproachtopatientselectionforreductionofcardiactoxicityinlocallyadvancedlungcancer