Cargando…
Does working memory protect against auditory distraction in older adults?
BACKGROUND: Past research indicates that when younger adults are engaged in a visual working memory task, they are less distracted by novel auditory stimuli than when engaged in a visual task that does not require working memory. The current study aimed to determine whether working memory affords th...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01909-w |
_version_ | 1783617492920303616 |
---|---|
author | Mahajan, Yatin Kim, Jeesun Davis, Chris |
author_facet | Mahajan, Yatin Kim, Jeesun Davis, Chris |
author_sort | Mahajan, Yatin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Past research indicates that when younger adults are engaged in a visual working memory task, they are less distracted by novel auditory stimuli than when engaged in a visual task that does not require working memory. The current study aimed to determine whether working memory affords the same protection to older adults. METHOD: We examined behavioral and EEG responses in 16 younger and 16 older adults to distractor sounds when the listeners performed two visual tasks; one that required working memory (W1) and the other that did not (W0). Auditory distractors were presented in an oddball paradigm, participants were exposed to either standard tones (600 Hz: 80%) or various novel environmental sounds (20%). RESULTS: It was found that: 1) when presented with novel vs standard sounds, older adults had faster correct response times in the W1 visual task than in the W0 task, indicating that they were less distracted by the novel sound; there was no difference in error rates. Younger adults did not show a task effect for correct response times but made slightly more errors when a novel sound was presented in the W1 task compared to the W0 task. 2) In older adults (but not the younger adults), the amplitude of N1 was smaller in the W1 condition compared to the W0 condition. 3) The working memory manipulation had no effect on MMN amplitude in older adults. 4) For the W1 compared to W0 task, the amplitude of P3a was attenuated for the older adults but not for the younger adults. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that during the working memory manipulation older adults were able to engage working memory to reduce the processing of task-irrelevant sounds. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7708091 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77080912020-12-02 Does working memory protect against auditory distraction in older adults? Mahajan, Yatin Kim, Jeesun Davis, Chris BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Past research indicates that when younger adults are engaged in a visual working memory task, they are less distracted by novel auditory stimuli than when engaged in a visual task that does not require working memory. The current study aimed to determine whether working memory affords the same protection to older adults. METHOD: We examined behavioral and EEG responses in 16 younger and 16 older adults to distractor sounds when the listeners performed two visual tasks; one that required working memory (W1) and the other that did not (W0). Auditory distractors were presented in an oddball paradigm, participants were exposed to either standard tones (600 Hz: 80%) or various novel environmental sounds (20%). RESULTS: It was found that: 1) when presented with novel vs standard sounds, older adults had faster correct response times in the W1 visual task than in the W0 task, indicating that they were less distracted by the novel sound; there was no difference in error rates. Younger adults did not show a task effect for correct response times but made slightly more errors when a novel sound was presented in the W1 task compared to the W0 task. 2) In older adults (but not the younger adults), the amplitude of N1 was smaller in the W1 condition compared to the W0 condition. 3) The working memory manipulation had no effect on MMN amplitude in older adults. 4) For the W1 compared to W0 task, the amplitude of P3a was attenuated for the older adults but not for the younger adults. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that during the working memory manipulation older adults were able to engage working memory to reduce the processing of task-irrelevant sounds. BioMed Central 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7708091/ /pubmed/33256631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01909-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mahajan, Yatin Kim, Jeesun Davis, Chris Does working memory protect against auditory distraction in older adults? |
title | Does working memory protect against auditory distraction in older adults? |
title_full | Does working memory protect against auditory distraction in older adults? |
title_fullStr | Does working memory protect against auditory distraction in older adults? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does working memory protect against auditory distraction in older adults? |
title_short | Does working memory protect against auditory distraction in older adults? |
title_sort | does working memory protect against auditory distraction in older adults? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01909-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahajanyatin doesworkingmemoryprotectagainstauditorydistractioninolderadults AT kimjeesun doesworkingmemoryprotectagainstauditorydistractioninolderadults AT davischris doesworkingmemoryprotectagainstauditorydistractioninolderadults |