Cargando…

Should ice application be replaced with neurocryostimulation for the treatment of acute lateral ankle sprains? A randomized clinical trial

STUDY DESIGN: Single-blind parallel group randomized clinical trial. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of neurocryostimulation (NCS) with those of traditional ice application on functional recovery, pain, edema and ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) in individuals receiving physiotherapy trea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tittley, Jean, Hébert, Luc J., Roy, Jean-Sébastien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33261633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00436-6
_version_ 1783617498949615616
author Tittley, Jean
Hébert, Luc J.
Roy, Jean-Sébastien
author_facet Tittley, Jean
Hébert, Luc J.
Roy, Jean-Sébastien
author_sort Tittley, Jean
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Single-blind parallel group randomized clinical trial. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of neurocryostimulation (NCS) with those of traditional ice application on functional recovery, pain, edema and ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) in individuals receiving physiotherapy treatments for acute lateral ankle sprains (LAS). BACKGROUND: Ankle sprain is a very common injury and its management is often costly, with important short- and long-term impacts on individuals and society. As new methods of therapy using cold (cryotherapy) are emerging for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions, little evidence exists to support their use. NCS, which provokes a rapid cooling of the skin with the liberation of pressured CO(2), is a method believed to accelerate the resorption of edema and recovery in the case of traumatic injuries. METHODS: Forty-one participants with acute LAS were randomly assigned either to a group that received in-clinic physiotherapy treatments and NCS (experimental NCS group, n = 20), or to a group that received the same in-clinic physiotherapy treatments and traditional ice application (comparison ice group, n = 21). Primary (Lower Extremity Functional Scale - LEFS) and secondary (visual analog scale for pain intensity at rest and during usual activities in the last 48 h, Figure of Eight measurement of edema, and weight bearing lunge for ankle dorsiflexion range of motion) outcomes were evaluated at baseline (T0), after one week (T1), two weeks (T2), four weeks (T4) and finally, after six weeks (T6). The effects of interventions were assessed using two-way ANOVA-type Nonparametric Analysis for Longitudinal Data (nparLD). RESULTS: No significant group-time interaction or group effect was observed for all outcomes (0.995 ≥ p ≥ 0.057) following the intervention. Large time effects were however observed for all outcomes (p <  0.0001). CONCLUSION: Results suggest that neurocryostimulation is no more effective than traditional ice application in improving functional recovery, pain, edema, and ankle dorsiflexion ROM during the first six weeks of physiotherapy treatments in individuals with acute LAS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 1b. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02945618. Registered 23 October 2016 - Retrospectively registered (25 participants recruited prior to registration, 17 participants after).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7708120
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77081202020-12-02 Should ice application be replaced with neurocryostimulation for the treatment of acute lateral ankle sprains? A randomized clinical trial Tittley, Jean Hébert, Luc J. Roy, Jean-Sébastien J Foot Ankle Res Research STUDY DESIGN: Single-blind parallel group randomized clinical trial. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of neurocryostimulation (NCS) with those of traditional ice application on functional recovery, pain, edema and ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) in individuals receiving physiotherapy treatments for acute lateral ankle sprains (LAS). BACKGROUND: Ankle sprain is a very common injury and its management is often costly, with important short- and long-term impacts on individuals and society. As new methods of therapy using cold (cryotherapy) are emerging for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions, little evidence exists to support their use. NCS, which provokes a rapid cooling of the skin with the liberation of pressured CO(2), is a method believed to accelerate the resorption of edema and recovery in the case of traumatic injuries. METHODS: Forty-one participants with acute LAS were randomly assigned either to a group that received in-clinic physiotherapy treatments and NCS (experimental NCS group, n = 20), or to a group that received the same in-clinic physiotherapy treatments and traditional ice application (comparison ice group, n = 21). Primary (Lower Extremity Functional Scale - LEFS) and secondary (visual analog scale for pain intensity at rest and during usual activities in the last 48 h, Figure of Eight measurement of edema, and weight bearing lunge for ankle dorsiflexion range of motion) outcomes were evaluated at baseline (T0), after one week (T1), two weeks (T2), four weeks (T4) and finally, after six weeks (T6). The effects of interventions were assessed using two-way ANOVA-type Nonparametric Analysis for Longitudinal Data (nparLD). RESULTS: No significant group-time interaction or group effect was observed for all outcomes (0.995 ≥ p ≥ 0.057) following the intervention. Large time effects were however observed for all outcomes (p <  0.0001). CONCLUSION: Results suggest that neurocryostimulation is no more effective than traditional ice application in improving functional recovery, pain, edema, and ankle dorsiflexion ROM during the first six weeks of physiotherapy treatments in individuals with acute LAS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 1b. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02945618. Registered 23 October 2016 - Retrospectively registered (25 participants recruited prior to registration, 17 participants after). BioMed Central 2020-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7708120/ /pubmed/33261633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00436-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tittley, Jean
Hébert, Luc J.
Roy, Jean-Sébastien
Should ice application be replaced with neurocryostimulation for the treatment of acute lateral ankle sprains? A randomized clinical trial
title Should ice application be replaced with neurocryostimulation for the treatment of acute lateral ankle sprains? A randomized clinical trial
title_full Should ice application be replaced with neurocryostimulation for the treatment of acute lateral ankle sprains? A randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Should ice application be replaced with neurocryostimulation for the treatment of acute lateral ankle sprains? A randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Should ice application be replaced with neurocryostimulation for the treatment of acute lateral ankle sprains? A randomized clinical trial
title_short Should ice application be replaced with neurocryostimulation for the treatment of acute lateral ankle sprains? A randomized clinical trial
title_sort should ice application be replaced with neurocryostimulation for the treatment of acute lateral ankle sprains? a randomized clinical trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33261633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00436-6
work_keys_str_mv AT tittleyjean shouldiceapplicationbereplacedwithneurocryostimulationforthetreatmentofacutelateralanklesprainsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hebertlucj shouldiceapplicationbereplacedwithneurocryostimulationforthetreatmentofacutelateralanklesprainsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT royjeansebastien shouldiceapplicationbereplacedwithneurocryostimulationforthetreatmentofacutelateralanklesprainsarandomizedclinicaltrial