Cargando…

Clinical syndromes and treatment location predict utility of carbapenem sparing therapies in ceftriaxone-non-susceptibleEscherichia colibloodstream infection

BACKGROUND: Cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, intravenous fosfomycin and plazomicin represent potential carbapenem sparing agents for extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase or AmpC beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli infection. However, available data is limited in predicti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Ouli, Cisera, Kathryn, Taylor, Lucy, Hughes, Carly, Rogers, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-020-00400-z
_version_ 1783617518189936640
author Xie, Ouli
Cisera, Kathryn
Taylor, Lucy
Hughes, Carly
Rogers, Benjamin
author_facet Xie, Ouli
Cisera, Kathryn
Taylor, Lucy
Hughes, Carly
Rogers, Benjamin
author_sort Xie, Ouli
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, intravenous fosfomycin and plazomicin represent potential carbapenem sparing agents for extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase or AmpC beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli infection. However, available data is limited in predicting the volume of carbapenem therapy which could be substituted and real-world contraindications. METHODS: We determined the number of carbapenem days of therapy (DOT) which could be substituted and frequent contraindications accounting for antimicrobial susceptibility and site of infection in an unselected cohort with ceftriaxone-non-susceptible E. coli bacteremia at a single health network from 2015 to 2016. Individual patient data was used to calculate DOT and substitution for each agent. RESULTS: There were 108 episodes of E. coli bacteremia resulting in 67.2 carbapenem DOT/100 patient-days of antimicrobial therapy administered. Ceftazidime-avibactam could be used to substitute 36.2 DOT/100 patient-days (54%) for inpatient definitive therapy, ceftolozane-tazobactam for 34.7 DOT/100 patient-days (52%), cefiderocol for 27.1 DOT/100 patient-days (40%), fosfomycin for 23.3 DOT /100 patient-days (35%) and plazomicin for 27.1 DOT/100 patient-days (40%). Non-urinary tract source of infection was the most frequent contraindication to fosfomycin (25), plazomicin (26) and cefiderocol (26). Use in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) programs accounted for 40% of DOT, all of which could be substituted if stability data allowed for ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam. CONCLUSIONS: All tested agents could be used to replace a significant volume of carbapenem therapy. Establishing stability of these agents for use in OPAT is required for maximizing their use as carbapenem sparing agents while randomized clinical data is awaited for some of these agents in resistant E. coli bacteremia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7708213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77082132020-12-02 Clinical syndromes and treatment location predict utility of carbapenem sparing therapies in ceftriaxone-non-susceptibleEscherichia colibloodstream infection Xie, Ouli Cisera, Kathryn Taylor, Lucy Hughes, Carly Rogers, Benjamin Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob Research BACKGROUND: Cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, intravenous fosfomycin and plazomicin represent potential carbapenem sparing agents for extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase or AmpC beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli infection. However, available data is limited in predicting the volume of carbapenem therapy which could be substituted and real-world contraindications. METHODS: We determined the number of carbapenem days of therapy (DOT) which could be substituted and frequent contraindications accounting for antimicrobial susceptibility and site of infection in an unselected cohort with ceftriaxone-non-susceptible E. coli bacteremia at a single health network from 2015 to 2016. Individual patient data was used to calculate DOT and substitution for each agent. RESULTS: There were 108 episodes of E. coli bacteremia resulting in 67.2 carbapenem DOT/100 patient-days of antimicrobial therapy administered. Ceftazidime-avibactam could be used to substitute 36.2 DOT/100 patient-days (54%) for inpatient definitive therapy, ceftolozane-tazobactam for 34.7 DOT/100 patient-days (52%), cefiderocol for 27.1 DOT/100 patient-days (40%), fosfomycin for 23.3 DOT /100 patient-days (35%) and plazomicin for 27.1 DOT/100 patient-days (40%). Non-urinary tract source of infection was the most frequent contraindication to fosfomycin (25), plazomicin (26) and cefiderocol (26). Use in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) programs accounted for 40% of DOT, all of which could be substituted if stability data allowed for ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam. CONCLUSIONS: All tested agents could be used to replace a significant volume of carbapenem therapy. Establishing stability of these agents for use in OPAT is required for maximizing their use as carbapenem sparing agents while randomized clinical data is awaited for some of these agents in resistant E. coli bacteremia. BioMed Central 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7708213/ /pubmed/33256752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-020-00400-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Xie, Ouli
Cisera, Kathryn
Taylor, Lucy
Hughes, Carly
Rogers, Benjamin
Clinical syndromes and treatment location predict utility of carbapenem sparing therapies in ceftriaxone-non-susceptibleEscherichia colibloodstream infection
title Clinical syndromes and treatment location predict utility of carbapenem sparing therapies in ceftriaxone-non-susceptibleEscherichia colibloodstream infection
title_full Clinical syndromes and treatment location predict utility of carbapenem sparing therapies in ceftriaxone-non-susceptibleEscherichia colibloodstream infection
title_fullStr Clinical syndromes and treatment location predict utility of carbapenem sparing therapies in ceftriaxone-non-susceptibleEscherichia colibloodstream infection
title_full_unstemmed Clinical syndromes and treatment location predict utility of carbapenem sparing therapies in ceftriaxone-non-susceptibleEscherichia colibloodstream infection
title_short Clinical syndromes and treatment location predict utility of carbapenem sparing therapies in ceftriaxone-non-susceptibleEscherichia colibloodstream infection
title_sort clinical syndromes and treatment location predict utility of carbapenem sparing therapies in ceftriaxone-non-susceptibleescherichia colibloodstream infection
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-020-00400-z
work_keys_str_mv AT xieouli clinicalsyndromesandtreatmentlocationpredictutilityofcarbapenemsparingtherapiesinceftriaxonenonsusceptibleescherichiacolibloodstreaminfection
AT ciserakathryn clinicalsyndromesandtreatmentlocationpredictutilityofcarbapenemsparingtherapiesinceftriaxonenonsusceptibleescherichiacolibloodstreaminfection
AT taylorlucy clinicalsyndromesandtreatmentlocationpredictutilityofcarbapenemsparingtherapiesinceftriaxonenonsusceptibleescherichiacolibloodstreaminfection
AT hughescarly clinicalsyndromesandtreatmentlocationpredictutilityofcarbapenemsparingtherapiesinceftriaxonenonsusceptibleescherichiacolibloodstreaminfection
AT rogersbenjamin clinicalsyndromesandtreatmentlocationpredictutilityofcarbapenemsparingtherapiesinceftriaxonenonsusceptibleescherichiacolibloodstreaminfection