Cargando…

The Impact of Filter Settings on Morphology of Unipolar Fibrillation Potentials

Using unipolar atrial electrogram morphology as guidance for ablative therapy is regaining interest. Although standardly used in clinical practice during ablative therapy, the impact of filter settings on morphology of unipolar AF potentials is unknown. Thirty different filters were applied to 2,557...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Starreveld, Roeliene, Knops, Paul, Roos-Serote, Maarten, Kik, Charles, Bogers, Ad J. J. C., Brundel, Bianca J. J. M., de Groot, Natasja M. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32410210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12265-020-10011-w
_version_ 1783617541856296960
author Starreveld, Roeliene
Knops, Paul
Roos-Serote, Maarten
Kik, Charles
Bogers, Ad J. J. C.
Brundel, Bianca J. J. M.
de Groot, Natasja M. S.
author_facet Starreveld, Roeliene
Knops, Paul
Roos-Serote, Maarten
Kik, Charles
Bogers, Ad J. J. C.
Brundel, Bianca J. J. M.
de Groot, Natasja M. S.
author_sort Starreveld, Roeliene
collection PubMed
description Using unipolar atrial electrogram morphology as guidance for ablative therapy is regaining interest. Although standardly used in clinical practice during ablative therapy, the impact of filter settings on morphology of unipolar AF potentials is unknown. Thirty different filters were applied to 2,557,045 high-resolution epicardial AF potentials recorded from ten patients. Deflections with slope ≤ − 0.05 mV/ms and amplitude ≥ 0.3 mV were marked. High-pass filtering decreased the number of detected potentials, deflection amplitude, and percentage of fractionated potentials (≥ 2 deflections) as well as fractionation delay time (FDT) and increased percentage of single potentials. Low-pass filtering decreased the number of potentials, percentage of fractionated potentials, whereas deflection amplitude, percentage of single potentials, and FDT increased. Notch filtering (50 Hz) decreased the number of potentials and deflection amplitude, whereas the percentage of complex fractionated potentials (≥ 3 deflections) increased. Filtering significantly impacted morphology of unipolar fibrillation potentials, becoming a potential source of error in identification of ablative targets. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12265-020-10011-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7708344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77083442020-12-03 The Impact of Filter Settings on Morphology of Unipolar Fibrillation Potentials Starreveld, Roeliene Knops, Paul Roos-Serote, Maarten Kik, Charles Bogers, Ad J. J. C. Brundel, Bianca J. J. M. de Groot, Natasja M. S. J Cardiovasc Transl Res Original Article Using unipolar atrial electrogram morphology as guidance for ablative therapy is regaining interest. Although standardly used in clinical practice during ablative therapy, the impact of filter settings on morphology of unipolar AF potentials is unknown. Thirty different filters were applied to 2,557,045 high-resolution epicardial AF potentials recorded from ten patients. Deflections with slope ≤ − 0.05 mV/ms and amplitude ≥ 0.3 mV were marked. High-pass filtering decreased the number of detected potentials, deflection amplitude, and percentage of fractionated potentials (≥ 2 deflections) as well as fractionation delay time (FDT) and increased percentage of single potentials. Low-pass filtering decreased the number of potentials, percentage of fractionated potentials, whereas deflection amplitude, percentage of single potentials, and FDT increased. Notch filtering (50 Hz) decreased the number of potentials and deflection amplitude, whereas the percentage of complex fractionated potentials (≥ 3 deflections) increased. Filtering significantly impacted morphology of unipolar fibrillation potentials, becoming a potential source of error in identification of ablative targets. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12265-020-10011-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-05-14 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7708344/ /pubmed/32410210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12265-020-10011-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Starreveld, Roeliene
Knops, Paul
Roos-Serote, Maarten
Kik, Charles
Bogers, Ad J. J. C.
Brundel, Bianca J. J. M.
de Groot, Natasja M. S.
The Impact of Filter Settings on Morphology of Unipolar Fibrillation Potentials
title The Impact of Filter Settings on Morphology of Unipolar Fibrillation Potentials
title_full The Impact of Filter Settings on Morphology of Unipolar Fibrillation Potentials
title_fullStr The Impact of Filter Settings on Morphology of Unipolar Fibrillation Potentials
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Filter Settings on Morphology of Unipolar Fibrillation Potentials
title_short The Impact of Filter Settings on Morphology of Unipolar Fibrillation Potentials
title_sort impact of filter settings on morphology of unipolar fibrillation potentials
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32410210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12265-020-10011-w
work_keys_str_mv AT starreveldroeliene theimpactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials
AT knopspaul theimpactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials
AT roosserotemaarten theimpactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials
AT kikcharles theimpactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials
AT bogersadjjc theimpactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials
AT brundelbiancajjm theimpactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials
AT degrootnatasjams theimpactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials
AT starreveldroeliene impactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials
AT knopspaul impactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials
AT roosserotemaarten impactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials
AT kikcharles impactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials
AT bogersadjjc impactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials
AT brundelbiancajjm impactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials
AT degrootnatasjams impactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials