Cargando…
The Impact of Filter Settings on Morphology of Unipolar Fibrillation Potentials
Using unipolar atrial electrogram morphology as guidance for ablative therapy is regaining interest. Although standardly used in clinical practice during ablative therapy, the impact of filter settings on morphology of unipolar AF potentials is unknown. Thirty different filters were applied to 2,557...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32410210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12265-020-10011-w |
_version_ | 1783617541856296960 |
---|---|
author | Starreveld, Roeliene Knops, Paul Roos-Serote, Maarten Kik, Charles Bogers, Ad J. J. C. Brundel, Bianca J. J. M. de Groot, Natasja M. S. |
author_facet | Starreveld, Roeliene Knops, Paul Roos-Serote, Maarten Kik, Charles Bogers, Ad J. J. C. Brundel, Bianca J. J. M. de Groot, Natasja M. S. |
author_sort | Starreveld, Roeliene |
collection | PubMed |
description | Using unipolar atrial electrogram morphology as guidance for ablative therapy is regaining interest. Although standardly used in clinical practice during ablative therapy, the impact of filter settings on morphology of unipolar AF potentials is unknown. Thirty different filters were applied to 2,557,045 high-resolution epicardial AF potentials recorded from ten patients. Deflections with slope ≤ − 0.05 mV/ms and amplitude ≥ 0.3 mV were marked. High-pass filtering decreased the number of detected potentials, deflection amplitude, and percentage of fractionated potentials (≥ 2 deflections) as well as fractionation delay time (FDT) and increased percentage of single potentials. Low-pass filtering decreased the number of potentials, percentage of fractionated potentials, whereas deflection amplitude, percentage of single potentials, and FDT increased. Notch filtering (50 Hz) decreased the number of potentials and deflection amplitude, whereas the percentage of complex fractionated potentials (≥ 3 deflections) increased. Filtering significantly impacted morphology of unipolar fibrillation potentials, becoming a potential source of error in identification of ablative targets. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12265-020-10011-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7708344 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77083442020-12-03 The Impact of Filter Settings on Morphology of Unipolar Fibrillation Potentials Starreveld, Roeliene Knops, Paul Roos-Serote, Maarten Kik, Charles Bogers, Ad J. J. C. Brundel, Bianca J. J. M. de Groot, Natasja M. S. J Cardiovasc Transl Res Original Article Using unipolar atrial electrogram morphology as guidance for ablative therapy is regaining interest. Although standardly used in clinical practice during ablative therapy, the impact of filter settings on morphology of unipolar AF potentials is unknown. Thirty different filters were applied to 2,557,045 high-resolution epicardial AF potentials recorded from ten patients. Deflections with slope ≤ − 0.05 mV/ms and amplitude ≥ 0.3 mV were marked. High-pass filtering decreased the number of detected potentials, deflection amplitude, and percentage of fractionated potentials (≥ 2 deflections) as well as fractionation delay time (FDT) and increased percentage of single potentials. Low-pass filtering decreased the number of potentials, percentage of fractionated potentials, whereas deflection amplitude, percentage of single potentials, and FDT increased. Notch filtering (50 Hz) decreased the number of potentials and deflection amplitude, whereas the percentage of complex fractionated potentials (≥ 3 deflections) increased. Filtering significantly impacted morphology of unipolar fibrillation potentials, becoming a potential source of error in identification of ablative targets. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12265-020-10011-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-05-14 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7708344/ /pubmed/32410210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12265-020-10011-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Starreveld, Roeliene Knops, Paul Roos-Serote, Maarten Kik, Charles Bogers, Ad J. J. C. Brundel, Bianca J. J. M. de Groot, Natasja M. S. The Impact of Filter Settings on Morphology of Unipolar Fibrillation Potentials |
title | The Impact of Filter Settings on Morphology of Unipolar Fibrillation Potentials |
title_full | The Impact of Filter Settings on Morphology of Unipolar Fibrillation Potentials |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Filter Settings on Morphology of Unipolar Fibrillation Potentials |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Filter Settings on Morphology of Unipolar Fibrillation Potentials |
title_short | The Impact of Filter Settings on Morphology of Unipolar Fibrillation Potentials |
title_sort | impact of filter settings on morphology of unipolar fibrillation potentials |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32410210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12265-020-10011-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT starreveldroeliene theimpactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials AT knopspaul theimpactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials AT roosserotemaarten theimpactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials AT kikcharles theimpactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials AT bogersadjjc theimpactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials AT brundelbiancajjm theimpactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials AT degrootnatasjams theimpactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials AT starreveldroeliene impactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials AT knopspaul impactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials AT roosserotemaarten impactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials AT kikcharles impactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials AT bogersadjjc impactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials AT brundelbiancajjm impactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials AT degrootnatasjams impactoffiltersettingsonmorphologyofunipolarfibrillationpotentials |