Cargando…
Value of susceptibility-weighted imaging for the assessment of angle measurements reflecting hip morphology
Radiographs are the clinical first line imaging modality for evaluating hip morphology and pathology. MRI offers additional information and is the method of choice to evaluate soft tissue, bone marrow and preradiographic signs of osteoarthritis. Radiographs are used to measure the most morphometric...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33262372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77671-1 |
_version_ | 1783617546332667904 |
---|---|
author | Böker, Sarah M. Adams, Lisa C. Fahlenkamp, Ute Lina Diederichs, Gerd Hamm, Bernd Makowski, Marcus R. |
author_facet | Böker, Sarah M. Adams, Lisa C. Fahlenkamp, Ute Lina Diederichs, Gerd Hamm, Bernd Makowski, Marcus R. |
author_sort | Böker, Sarah M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Radiographs are the clinical first line imaging modality for evaluating hip morphology and pathology. MRI offers additional information and is the method of choice to evaluate soft tissue, bone marrow and preradiographic signs of osteoarthritis. Radiographs are used to measure the most morphometric parameters. The aim of this study was to compare susceptibility weighted MRI (SWMR) with radiographs to evaluate hip morphology. 40 Patients were examined with standard MR-sequences, coronal SWMR and radiographs in anteroposterior pelvic view. Coronal maximum intensity projection (MIP) images of both hips were automatically reconstructed on SWMR and T1weighted images. Sharp´s angle, Tönnis angle, lateral center–edge angle of Wiberg and caput-collum-diaphyseal angle were measured on coronal SWMR MIP-images, T1weighted MIP-images and radiographs. Measurements were compared by linear regression analysis and Bland-Altmann Plots, using radiographs as reference standard. Additionally, a ratio between the signal intensity of muscles and bone on SWMR and T1weighted MIP-images was calculated and compared between these two sequences. SWMR enables the reliable assessment of Sharp´s angle (SWMR: R(2) = 0.80; T1weighted: R(2) = 0.37), Tönnis angle (SWMR: R(2) = 0.86; T1weighted: not measurable), lateral center–edge angle of Wiberg (SWMR: R(2) = 0.88; T1weighted: R(2) = 0.40) and caput-collum-diaphyseal angle (SWMR: R(2) = 0.38; T1weighted: R(2) = 0.18) compared to radiographs with a higher accuracy than conventional MR imaging. The ratio between the intensity of muscles and bone was significant higher on SWMR (2.00 and 2.02) than on T1weighted MIP-images (1.6 and 1.42; p < 0.001). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7708417 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77084172020-12-02 Value of susceptibility-weighted imaging for the assessment of angle measurements reflecting hip morphology Böker, Sarah M. Adams, Lisa C. Fahlenkamp, Ute Lina Diederichs, Gerd Hamm, Bernd Makowski, Marcus R. Sci Rep Article Radiographs are the clinical first line imaging modality for evaluating hip morphology and pathology. MRI offers additional information and is the method of choice to evaluate soft tissue, bone marrow and preradiographic signs of osteoarthritis. Radiographs are used to measure the most morphometric parameters. The aim of this study was to compare susceptibility weighted MRI (SWMR) with radiographs to evaluate hip morphology. 40 Patients were examined with standard MR-sequences, coronal SWMR and radiographs in anteroposterior pelvic view. Coronal maximum intensity projection (MIP) images of both hips were automatically reconstructed on SWMR and T1weighted images. Sharp´s angle, Tönnis angle, lateral center–edge angle of Wiberg and caput-collum-diaphyseal angle were measured on coronal SWMR MIP-images, T1weighted MIP-images and radiographs. Measurements were compared by linear regression analysis and Bland-Altmann Plots, using radiographs as reference standard. Additionally, a ratio between the signal intensity of muscles and bone on SWMR and T1weighted MIP-images was calculated and compared between these two sequences. SWMR enables the reliable assessment of Sharp´s angle (SWMR: R(2) = 0.80; T1weighted: R(2) = 0.37), Tönnis angle (SWMR: R(2) = 0.86; T1weighted: not measurable), lateral center–edge angle of Wiberg (SWMR: R(2) = 0.88; T1weighted: R(2) = 0.40) and caput-collum-diaphyseal angle (SWMR: R(2) = 0.38; T1weighted: R(2) = 0.18) compared to radiographs with a higher accuracy than conventional MR imaging. The ratio between the intensity of muscles and bone was significant higher on SWMR (2.00 and 2.02) than on T1weighted MIP-images (1.6 and 1.42; p < 0.001). Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7708417/ /pubmed/33262372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77671-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Böker, Sarah M. Adams, Lisa C. Fahlenkamp, Ute Lina Diederichs, Gerd Hamm, Bernd Makowski, Marcus R. Value of susceptibility-weighted imaging for the assessment of angle measurements reflecting hip morphology |
title | Value of susceptibility-weighted imaging for the assessment of angle measurements reflecting hip morphology |
title_full | Value of susceptibility-weighted imaging for the assessment of angle measurements reflecting hip morphology |
title_fullStr | Value of susceptibility-weighted imaging for the assessment of angle measurements reflecting hip morphology |
title_full_unstemmed | Value of susceptibility-weighted imaging for the assessment of angle measurements reflecting hip morphology |
title_short | Value of susceptibility-weighted imaging for the assessment of angle measurements reflecting hip morphology |
title_sort | value of susceptibility-weighted imaging for the assessment of angle measurements reflecting hip morphology |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33262372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77671-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bokersarahm valueofsusceptibilityweightedimagingfortheassessmentofanglemeasurementsreflectinghipmorphology AT adamslisac valueofsusceptibilityweightedimagingfortheassessmentofanglemeasurementsreflectinghipmorphology AT fahlenkamputelina valueofsusceptibilityweightedimagingfortheassessmentofanglemeasurementsreflectinghipmorphology AT diederichsgerd valueofsusceptibilityweightedimagingfortheassessmentofanglemeasurementsreflectinghipmorphology AT hammbernd valueofsusceptibilityweightedimagingfortheassessmentofanglemeasurementsreflectinghipmorphology AT makowskimarcusr valueofsusceptibilityweightedimagingfortheassessmentofanglemeasurementsreflectinghipmorphology |