Cargando…

Value of susceptibility-weighted imaging for the assessment of angle measurements reflecting hip morphology

Radiographs are the clinical first line imaging modality for evaluating hip morphology and pathology. MRI offers additional information and is the method of choice to evaluate soft tissue, bone marrow and preradiographic signs of osteoarthritis. Radiographs are used to measure the most morphometric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Böker, Sarah M., Adams, Lisa C., Fahlenkamp, Ute Lina, Diederichs, Gerd, Hamm, Bernd, Makowski, Marcus R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33262372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77671-1
_version_ 1783617546332667904
author Böker, Sarah M.
Adams, Lisa C.
Fahlenkamp, Ute Lina
Diederichs, Gerd
Hamm, Bernd
Makowski, Marcus R.
author_facet Böker, Sarah M.
Adams, Lisa C.
Fahlenkamp, Ute Lina
Diederichs, Gerd
Hamm, Bernd
Makowski, Marcus R.
author_sort Böker, Sarah M.
collection PubMed
description Radiographs are the clinical first line imaging modality for evaluating hip morphology and pathology. MRI offers additional information and is the method of choice to evaluate soft tissue, bone marrow and preradiographic signs of osteoarthritis. Radiographs are used to measure the most morphometric parameters. The aim of this study was to compare susceptibility weighted MRI (SWMR) with radiographs to evaluate hip morphology. 40 Patients were examined with standard MR-sequences, coronal SWMR and radiographs in anteroposterior pelvic view. Coronal maximum intensity projection (MIP) images of both hips were automatically reconstructed on SWMR and T1weighted images. Sharp´s angle, Tönnis angle, lateral center–edge angle of Wiberg and caput-collum-diaphyseal angle were measured on coronal SWMR MIP-images, T1weighted MIP-images and radiographs. Measurements were compared by linear regression analysis and Bland-Altmann Plots, using radiographs as reference standard. Additionally, a ratio between the signal intensity of muscles and bone on SWMR and T1weighted MIP-images was calculated and compared between these two sequences. SWMR enables the reliable assessment of Sharp´s angle (SWMR: R(2) = 0.80; T1weighted: R(2) = 0.37), Tönnis angle (SWMR: R(2) = 0.86; T1weighted: not measurable), lateral center–edge angle of Wiberg (SWMR: R(2) = 0.88; T1weighted: R(2) = 0.40) and caput-collum-diaphyseal angle (SWMR: R(2) = 0.38; T1weighted: R(2) = 0.18) compared to radiographs with a higher accuracy than conventional MR imaging. The ratio between the intensity of muscles and bone was significant higher on SWMR (2.00 and 2.02) than on T1weighted MIP-images (1.6 and 1.42; p < 0.001).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7708417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77084172020-12-02 Value of susceptibility-weighted imaging for the assessment of angle measurements reflecting hip morphology Böker, Sarah M. Adams, Lisa C. Fahlenkamp, Ute Lina Diederichs, Gerd Hamm, Bernd Makowski, Marcus R. Sci Rep Article Radiographs are the clinical first line imaging modality for evaluating hip morphology and pathology. MRI offers additional information and is the method of choice to evaluate soft tissue, bone marrow and preradiographic signs of osteoarthritis. Radiographs are used to measure the most morphometric parameters. The aim of this study was to compare susceptibility weighted MRI (SWMR) with radiographs to evaluate hip morphology. 40 Patients were examined with standard MR-sequences, coronal SWMR and radiographs in anteroposterior pelvic view. Coronal maximum intensity projection (MIP) images of both hips were automatically reconstructed on SWMR and T1weighted images. Sharp´s angle, Tönnis angle, lateral center–edge angle of Wiberg and caput-collum-diaphyseal angle were measured on coronal SWMR MIP-images, T1weighted MIP-images and radiographs. Measurements were compared by linear regression analysis and Bland-Altmann Plots, using radiographs as reference standard. Additionally, a ratio between the signal intensity of muscles and bone on SWMR and T1weighted MIP-images was calculated and compared between these two sequences. SWMR enables the reliable assessment of Sharp´s angle (SWMR: R(2) = 0.80; T1weighted: R(2) = 0.37), Tönnis angle (SWMR: R(2) = 0.86; T1weighted: not measurable), lateral center–edge angle of Wiberg (SWMR: R(2) = 0.88; T1weighted: R(2) = 0.40) and caput-collum-diaphyseal angle (SWMR: R(2) = 0.38; T1weighted: R(2) = 0.18) compared to radiographs with a higher accuracy than conventional MR imaging. The ratio between the intensity of muscles and bone was significant higher on SWMR (2.00 and 2.02) than on T1weighted MIP-images (1.6 and 1.42; p < 0.001). Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7708417/ /pubmed/33262372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77671-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Böker, Sarah M.
Adams, Lisa C.
Fahlenkamp, Ute Lina
Diederichs, Gerd
Hamm, Bernd
Makowski, Marcus R.
Value of susceptibility-weighted imaging for the assessment of angle measurements reflecting hip morphology
title Value of susceptibility-weighted imaging for the assessment of angle measurements reflecting hip morphology
title_full Value of susceptibility-weighted imaging for the assessment of angle measurements reflecting hip morphology
title_fullStr Value of susceptibility-weighted imaging for the assessment of angle measurements reflecting hip morphology
title_full_unstemmed Value of susceptibility-weighted imaging for the assessment of angle measurements reflecting hip morphology
title_short Value of susceptibility-weighted imaging for the assessment of angle measurements reflecting hip morphology
title_sort value of susceptibility-weighted imaging for the assessment of angle measurements reflecting hip morphology
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33262372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77671-1
work_keys_str_mv AT bokersarahm valueofsusceptibilityweightedimagingfortheassessmentofanglemeasurementsreflectinghipmorphology
AT adamslisac valueofsusceptibilityweightedimagingfortheassessmentofanglemeasurementsreflectinghipmorphology
AT fahlenkamputelina valueofsusceptibilityweightedimagingfortheassessmentofanglemeasurementsreflectinghipmorphology
AT diederichsgerd valueofsusceptibilityweightedimagingfortheassessmentofanglemeasurementsreflectinghipmorphology
AT hammbernd valueofsusceptibilityweightedimagingfortheassessmentofanglemeasurementsreflectinghipmorphology
AT makowskimarcusr valueofsusceptibilityweightedimagingfortheassessmentofanglemeasurementsreflectinghipmorphology