Cargando…
Control of response interference: caudate nucleus contributes to selective inhibition
While the role of cortical regions in cognitive control processes is well accepted, the contribution of subcortical structures (e.g., the striatum), especially to the control of response interference, remains controversial. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the cortical and particula...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33262369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77744-1 |
_version_ | 1783617548943622144 |
---|---|
author | Schmidt, Claudia C. Timpert, David C. Arend, Isabel Vossel, Simone Fink, Gereon R. Henik, Avishai Weiss, Peter H. |
author_facet | Schmidt, Claudia C. Timpert, David C. Arend, Isabel Vossel, Simone Fink, Gereon R. Henik, Avishai Weiss, Peter H. |
author_sort | Schmidt, Claudia C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | While the role of cortical regions in cognitive control processes is well accepted, the contribution of subcortical structures (e.g., the striatum), especially to the control of response interference, remains controversial. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the cortical and particularly subcortical neural mechanisms of response interference control (including selective inhibition). Thirteen healthy young participants underwent event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing a unimanual version of the Simon task. In this task, successful performance required the resolution of stimulus–response conflicts in incongruent trials by selectively inhibiting interfering response tendencies. The behavioral results show an asymmetrical Simon effect that was more pronounced in the contralateral hemifield. Contrasting incongruent trials with congruent trials (i.e., the overall Simon effect) significantly activated clusters in the right anterior cingulate cortex, the right posterior insula, and the caudate nucleus bilaterally. Furthermore, a region of interest analysis based on previous patient studies revealed that activation in the bilateral caudate nucleus significantly co-varied with a parameter of selective inhibition derived from distributional analyses of response times. Our results corroborate the notion that the cognitive control of response interference is supported by a fronto-striatal circuitry, with a functional contribution of the caudate nucleus to the selective inhibition of interfering response tendencies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7708449 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77084492020-12-02 Control of response interference: caudate nucleus contributes to selective inhibition Schmidt, Claudia C. Timpert, David C. Arend, Isabel Vossel, Simone Fink, Gereon R. Henik, Avishai Weiss, Peter H. Sci Rep Article While the role of cortical regions in cognitive control processes is well accepted, the contribution of subcortical structures (e.g., the striatum), especially to the control of response interference, remains controversial. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the cortical and particularly subcortical neural mechanisms of response interference control (including selective inhibition). Thirteen healthy young participants underwent event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing a unimanual version of the Simon task. In this task, successful performance required the resolution of stimulus–response conflicts in incongruent trials by selectively inhibiting interfering response tendencies. The behavioral results show an asymmetrical Simon effect that was more pronounced in the contralateral hemifield. Contrasting incongruent trials with congruent trials (i.e., the overall Simon effect) significantly activated clusters in the right anterior cingulate cortex, the right posterior insula, and the caudate nucleus bilaterally. Furthermore, a region of interest analysis based on previous patient studies revealed that activation in the bilateral caudate nucleus significantly co-varied with a parameter of selective inhibition derived from distributional analyses of response times. Our results corroborate the notion that the cognitive control of response interference is supported by a fronto-striatal circuitry, with a functional contribution of the caudate nucleus to the selective inhibition of interfering response tendencies. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7708449/ /pubmed/33262369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77744-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Schmidt, Claudia C. Timpert, David C. Arend, Isabel Vossel, Simone Fink, Gereon R. Henik, Avishai Weiss, Peter H. Control of response interference: caudate nucleus contributes to selective inhibition |
title | Control of response interference: caudate nucleus contributes to selective inhibition |
title_full | Control of response interference: caudate nucleus contributes to selective inhibition |
title_fullStr | Control of response interference: caudate nucleus contributes to selective inhibition |
title_full_unstemmed | Control of response interference: caudate nucleus contributes to selective inhibition |
title_short | Control of response interference: caudate nucleus contributes to selective inhibition |
title_sort | control of response interference: caudate nucleus contributes to selective inhibition |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33262369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77744-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schmidtclaudiac controlofresponseinterferencecaudatenucleuscontributestoselectiveinhibition AT timpertdavidc controlofresponseinterferencecaudatenucleuscontributestoselectiveinhibition AT arendisabel controlofresponseinterferencecaudatenucleuscontributestoselectiveinhibition AT vosselsimone controlofresponseinterferencecaudatenucleuscontributestoselectiveinhibition AT finkgereonr controlofresponseinterferencecaudatenucleuscontributestoselectiveinhibition AT henikavishai controlofresponseinterferencecaudatenucleuscontributestoselectiveinhibition AT weisspeterh controlofresponseinterferencecaudatenucleuscontributestoselectiveinhibition |