Cargando…

Retrospective Chart Review on Real-World Use of Latanoprostene Bunod 0.024% in Treatment-Naïve Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to evaluate real-world effectiveness of latanoprostene bunod (LBN) ophthalmic solution 0.024% in treatment-naïve patients newly diagnosed with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective chart review included...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okeke, Constance O., Burstein, Eitan S., Trubnik, Valerie, Deom, James E., Cooper, Michael S., Brinkley, Desirae A., Thimons, J. James, Kabiri, Alexander J., Gelb, Kerry M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33034885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-020-00307-0
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to evaluate real-world effectiveness of latanoprostene bunod (LBN) ophthalmic solution 0.024% in treatment-naïve patients newly diagnosed with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective chart review included patients aged ≥ 18 years, with no history of medical, laser, or surgical intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering intervention and at least two follow-up visits (spanning ≥ 2 months) following initiation of LBN treatment. Extracted data included age, sex, race, cup-to-disk ratio, central corneal thickness, IOP, visual acuity (VA), concomitant medications, and adverse events. In patients treated bilaterally, the eye with the higher baseline IOP was the study eye. RESULTS: Medical charts for 65 patients (mean [SD] age, 59 [14] years; 53.8% female) encompassing 125 eyes treated with LBN were reviewed across nine clinical sites. Mean (SD) IOP at baseline was 21.7 (5.9) mmHg. Mean days to first and second follow-up visit were 43 and 141, respectively. LBN use resulted in a mean (SD) reduction from baseline of 7.1 (4.7) and 7.3 (5.1) mmHg at the first and second follow-up visits, respectively (P < 0.0001 for both). Reductions among patients with IOP > 21 mmHg (n = 30) at baseline were 10.0 (4.5) and 11.1 (4.6) mmHg at the first and second follow-up visits (P < 0.0001 for both). There were no meaningful changes in VA. Adverse events appeared infrequent, with only one report of ocular redness. CONCLUSION: In this real-world, retrospective chart review, LBN 0.024% use resulted in robust IOP lowering in newly diagnosed OAG patients new to treatment, and appeared well tolerated.