Cargando…
Effect of welfare standards and biosecurity practices on antimicrobial use in beef cattle
Antimicrobial use (AMU) in livestock species and the associated antimicrobial resistance are a global concern, thus strategies for their reduction and a more judicious use are needed. Previous research has revealed a link between improved animal welfare, biosecurity and AMU reduction in pig and dair...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33262402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77838-w |
_version_ | 1783617581600473088 |
---|---|
author | Diana, Alessia Lorenzi, Valentina Penasa, Mauro Magni, Edoardo Alborali, Giovanni L. Bertocchi, Luigi De Marchi, Massimo |
author_facet | Diana, Alessia Lorenzi, Valentina Penasa, Mauro Magni, Edoardo Alborali, Giovanni L. Bertocchi, Luigi De Marchi, Massimo |
author_sort | Diana, Alessia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Antimicrobial use (AMU) in livestock species and the associated antimicrobial resistance are a global concern, thus strategies for their reduction and a more judicious use are needed. Previous research has revealed a link between improved animal welfare, biosecurity and AMU reduction in pig and dairy sectors, however, little is known about the beef sector. This study aimed to investigate the impact of welfare standards and biosecurity on AMU in beef cattle. Data on performance traits and AMU were collected over a 3.5 year time from 27 specialised beef farms and a treatment incidence was calculated using the defined daily dose for animals. An on-farm assessment was carried out by assigning a score from 0 (very poor) to 100% (very good) to 3 sections: welfare, biosecurity and emergency management. The highest average score was obtained for the welfare section (76%) followed by emergency management (39%) and biosecurity (24%). This suggests that major focus on strategies for the implementation of biosecurity measures and emergency management is needed, due to the low scores reported. A statistically significant lower AMU was observed with improved level of welfare. These results may be helpful for farm benchmarking and highlight the importance of improved animal welfare for an efficient antimicrobial stewardship. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7708642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77086422020-12-03 Effect of welfare standards and biosecurity practices on antimicrobial use in beef cattle Diana, Alessia Lorenzi, Valentina Penasa, Mauro Magni, Edoardo Alborali, Giovanni L. Bertocchi, Luigi De Marchi, Massimo Sci Rep Article Antimicrobial use (AMU) in livestock species and the associated antimicrobial resistance are a global concern, thus strategies for their reduction and a more judicious use are needed. Previous research has revealed a link between improved animal welfare, biosecurity and AMU reduction in pig and dairy sectors, however, little is known about the beef sector. This study aimed to investigate the impact of welfare standards and biosecurity on AMU in beef cattle. Data on performance traits and AMU were collected over a 3.5 year time from 27 specialised beef farms and a treatment incidence was calculated using the defined daily dose for animals. An on-farm assessment was carried out by assigning a score from 0 (very poor) to 100% (very good) to 3 sections: welfare, biosecurity and emergency management. The highest average score was obtained for the welfare section (76%) followed by emergency management (39%) and biosecurity (24%). This suggests that major focus on strategies for the implementation of biosecurity measures and emergency management is needed, due to the low scores reported. A statistically significant lower AMU was observed with improved level of welfare. These results may be helpful for farm benchmarking and highlight the importance of improved animal welfare for an efficient antimicrobial stewardship. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7708642/ /pubmed/33262402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77838-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Diana, Alessia Lorenzi, Valentina Penasa, Mauro Magni, Edoardo Alborali, Giovanni L. Bertocchi, Luigi De Marchi, Massimo Effect of welfare standards and biosecurity practices on antimicrobial use in beef cattle |
title | Effect of welfare standards and biosecurity practices on antimicrobial use in beef cattle |
title_full | Effect of welfare standards and biosecurity practices on antimicrobial use in beef cattle |
title_fullStr | Effect of welfare standards and biosecurity practices on antimicrobial use in beef cattle |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of welfare standards and biosecurity practices on antimicrobial use in beef cattle |
title_short | Effect of welfare standards and biosecurity practices on antimicrobial use in beef cattle |
title_sort | effect of welfare standards and biosecurity practices on antimicrobial use in beef cattle |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33262402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77838-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dianaalessia effectofwelfarestandardsandbiosecuritypracticesonantimicrobialuseinbeefcattle AT lorenzivalentina effectofwelfarestandardsandbiosecuritypracticesonantimicrobialuseinbeefcattle AT penasamauro effectofwelfarestandardsandbiosecuritypracticesonantimicrobialuseinbeefcattle AT magniedoardo effectofwelfarestandardsandbiosecuritypracticesonantimicrobialuseinbeefcattle AT alboraligiovannil effectofwelfarestandardsandbiosecuritypracticesonantimicrobialuseinbeefcattle AT bertocchiluigi effectofwelfarestandardsandbiosecuritypracticesonantimicrobialuseinbeefcattle AT demarchimassimo effectofwelfarestandardsandbiosecuritypracticesonantimicrobialuseinbeefcattle |