Cargando…

Two-phase amputation among critically ill patients with ischemic gangrene of lower limbs as a way to improve treatment outcome. Cohort study

BACKGROUND: The results of lower limb amputation, especially in critically ill patients with severe endogenous intoxication, sepsis, multi-organ failure and severe concomitant diseases are still unsatisfactory. Guillotine amputation is a method routinely used to reduce wound complications associated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsvetkov, Vitaly O., Gorshunova, Elena M., Kolovanova, Olga V., Kozlov, Jury A., Gobegishvili, Vakhtang V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33304569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.045
_version_ 1783617589605302272
author Tsvetkov, Vitaly O.
Gorshunova, Elena M.
Kolovanova, Olga V.
Kozlov, Jury A.
Gobegishvili, Vakhtang V.
author_facet Tsvetkov, Vitaly O.
Gorshunova, Elena M.
Kolovanova, Olga V.
Kozlov, Jury A.
Gobegishvili, Vakhtang V.
author_sort Tsvetkov, Vitaly O.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The results of lower limb amputation, especially in critically ill patients with severe endogenous intoxication, sepsis, multi-organ failure and severe concomitant diseases are still unsatisfactory. Guillotine amputation is a method routinely used to reduce wound complications associated with wet gangrene and severe cases of diabetic foot, however, it is unclear how well it could help to decrease mortality and improve functional outcome when dealing with critically ill patients. THE OBJECTIVE: of the study was to estimate the effectiveness of two-phase method of urgent low limb amputation among critically ill patients with high risk of complications. The effectiveness was evaluated in terms of perioperative mortality, frequency of early complications and ultimate level of limb loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two cohort groups of patients with acute lower limb gangrene were retrospectively matched. Approximately 25.8% of patients from the comparison (control) group (N = 240) died without surgery due to severity of their condition and ineffective pre-operative treatment. The remaining patients underwent one-phase high-level amputation after 48–72 h of pre-operative intensive care. The experimental group consisted of 153 patients who underwent guillotine amputation at the lower part of tibia (34.6%), knee disarticulation (32.0%), or open thigh amputation (33.3%), depending on the level of irreversible soft tissue necrosis. The reamputation with the stump shaping was performed later when their health status improved. RESULTS: The assessment of treatment outcomes showed that the two-phase amputation in critically ill patients (i) decreased the mortality from 48.7 to 37.9%, (ii) reduced the risk of wound complications from 20.9 to 11.1%, and (iii) improved functional results by saving the knee joint in 34.6 versus 4.5% in comparison/control group. CONCLUSION: The method of two-phase amputation is recommended for critically ill patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7708686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77086862020-12-09 Two-phase amputation among critically ill patients with ischemic gangrene of lower limbs as a way to improve treatment outcome. Cohort study Tsvetkov, Vitaly O. Gorshunova, Elena M. Kolovanova, Olga V. Kozlov, Jury A. Gobegishvili, Vakhtang V. Ann Med Surg (Lond) Cohort Study BACKGROUND: The results of lower limb amputation, especially in critically ill patients with severe endogenous intoxication, sepsis, multi-organ failure and severe concomitant diseases are still unsatisfactory. Guillotine amputation is a method routinely used to reduce wound complications associated with wet gangrene and severe cases of diabetic foot, however, it is unclear how well it could help to decrease mortality and improve functional outcome when dealing with critically ill patients. THE OBJECTIVE: of the study was to estimate the effectiveness of two-phase method of urgent low limb amputation among critically ill patients with high risk of complications. The effectiveness was evaluated in terms of perioperative mortality, frequency of early complications and ultimate level of limb loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two cohort groups of patients with acute lower limb gangrene were retrospectively matched. Approximately 25.8% of patients from the comparison (control) group (N = 240) died without surgery due to severity of their condition and ineffective pre-operative treatment. The remaining patients underwent one-phase high-level amputation after 48–72 h of pre-operative intensive care. The experimental group consisted of 153 patients who underwent guillotine amputation at the lower part of tibia (34.6%), knee disarticulation (32.0%), or open thigh amputation (33.3%), depending on the level of irreversible soft tissue necrosis. The reamputation with the stump shaping was performed later when their health status improved. RESULTS: The assessment of treatment outcomes showed that the two-phase amputation in critically ill patients (i) decreased the mortality from 48.7 to 37.9%, (ii) reduced the risk of wound complications from 20.9 to 11.1%, and (iii) improved functional results by saving the knee joint in 34.6 versus 4.5% in comparison/control group. CONCLUSION: The method of two-phase amputation is recommended for critically ill patients. Elsevier 2020-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7708686/ /pubmed/33304569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.045 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Cohort Study
Tsvetkov, Vitaly O.
Gorshunova, Elena M.
Kolovanova, Olga V.
Kozlov, Jury A.
Gobegishvili, Vakhtang V.
Two-phase amputation among critically ill patients with ischemic gangrene of lower limbs as a way to improve treatment outcome. Cohort study
title Two-phase amputation among critically ill patients with ischemic gangrene of lower limbs as a way to improve treatment outcome. Cohort study
title_full Two-phase amputation among critically ill patients with ischemic gangrene of lower limbs as a way to improve treatment outcome. Cohort study
title_fullStr Two-phase amputation among critically ill patients with ischemic gangrene of lower limbs as a way to improve treatment outcome. Cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Two-phase amputation among critically ill patients with ischemic gangrene of lower limbs as a way to improve treatment outcome. Cohort study
title_short Two-phase amputation among critically ill patients with ischemic gangrene of lower limbs as a way to improve treatment outcome. Cohort study
title_sort two-phase amputation among critically ill patients with ischemic gangrene of lower limbs as a way to improve treatment outcome. cohort study
topic Cohort Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33304569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.045
work_keys_str_mv AT tsvetkovvitalyo twophaseamputationamongcriticallyillpatientswithischemicgangreneoflowerlimbsasawaytoimprovetreatmentoutcomecohortstudy
AT gorshunovaelenam twophaseamputationamongcriticallyillpatientswithischemicgangreneoflowerlimbsasawaytoimprovetreatmentoutcomecohortstudy
AT kolovanovaolgav twophaseamputationamongcriticallyillpatientswithischemicgangreneoflowerlimbsasawaytoimprovetreatmentoutcomecohortstudy
AT kozlovjurya twophaseamputationamongcriticallyillpatientswithischemicgangreneoflowerlimbsasawaytoimprovetreatmentoutcomecohortstudy
AT gobegishvilivakhtangv twophaseamputationamongcriticallyillpatientswithischemicgangreneoflowerlimbsasawaytoimprovetreatmentoutcomecohortstudy