Cargando…

The Challenges of Treating Female Soccer Players With ACL Injuries: Hamstring Versus Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Autograft

BACKGROUND: Although anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are common in female soccer players, the optimal graft option for ACL reconstruction is currently unclear. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To compare the outcomes of female soccer players after ACL reconstruction using either hamstring tendon autogr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Britt, Elise, Ouillette, Ryan, Edmonds, Eric, Chambers, Henry, Johnson, Kristina, Bastrom, Tracey, Pennock, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120964884
_version_ 1783617596474523648
author Britt, Elise
Ouillette, Ryan
Edmonds, Eric
Chambers, Henry
Johnson, Kristina
Bastrom, Tracey
Pennock, Andrew
author_facet Britt, Elise
Ouillette, Ryan
Edmonds, Eric
Chambers, Henry
Johnson, Kristina
Bastrom, Tracey
Pennock, Andrew
author_sort Britt, Elise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are common in female soccer players, the optimal graft option for ACL reconstruction is currently unclear. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To compare the outcomes of female soccer players after ACL reconstruction using either hamstring tendon autograft or bone–patellar tendon–bone (BTB) autograft. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in clinical outcome scores, return to sport, or retear rates between BTB and hamstring grafts in our study cohort. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all skeletally mature adolescent female soccer players who underwent primary ACL reconstruction using either hamstring tendon or BTB autograft between 2013 and 2016. Demographic, injury, and surgical variables were documented. Outcome measures included the Lysholm score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Tegner activity score, and visual analog scales for pain and for satisfaction, as well as ability to return to sport. RESULTS: Overall, 90 female soccer players met the inclusion criteria, of whom 79% (41 BTB and 30 hamstring) were available for a minimum 2-year follow-up or had a graft failure before the follow-up. The BTB group had a lower body mass index (mean ± SD, 23 ± 3 vs 25 ± 4; P = .02) and shorter postoperative follow-up time in months (mean ± SD, 37.4 vs 46.1; P ≤ .001); otherwise, no differences in demographic, injury, or surgical variables between groups were noted. Regarding outcome measures, the BTB group achieved a higher Tegner score (6.0 vs 4.2; P = .004), and there was no other difference between groups. Of the patients who did not return to soccer, 44.7% reported fear as the reason. Of the patients who did return to soccer, 31.9% sustained another ACL injury (retear or contralateral tear), with no differences in reinjury rates based on graft selection. CONCLUSION: Adolescent female soccer players undergoing ACL reconstruction had relatively high satisfaction and outcome scores independent of autograft choice. Notwithstanding, patients and families need to be counseled that less than half of patients will return to their preinjury level of sport and, if an athlete attempts to return, there is a high risk of further ACL injury.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7708716
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77087162020-12-07 The Challenges of Treating Female Soccer Players With ACL Injuries: Hamstring Versus Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Autograft Britt, Elise Ouillette, Ryan Edmonds, Eric Chambers, Henry Johnson, Kristina Bastrom, Tracey Pennock, Andrew Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Although anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are common in female soccer players, the optimal graft option for ACL reconstruction is currently unclear. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To compare the outcomes of female soccer players after ACL reconstruction using either hamstring tendon autograft or bone–patellar tendon–bone (BTB) autograft. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in clinical outcome scores, return to sport, or retear rates between BTB and hamstring grafts in our study cohort. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all skeletally mature adolescent female soccer players who underwent primary ACL reconstruction using either hamstring tendon or BTB autograft between 2013 and 2016. Demographic, injury, and surgical variables were documented. Outcome measures included the Lysholm score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Tegner activity score, and visual analog scales for pain and for satisfaction, as well as ability to return to sport. RESULTS: Overall, 90 female soccer players met the inclusion criteria, of whom 79% (41 BTB and 30 hamstring) were available for a minimum 2-year follow-up or had a graft failure before the follow-up. The BTB group had a lower body mass index (mean ± SD, 23 ± 3 vs 25 ± 4; P = .02) and shorter postoperative follow-up time in months (mean ± SD, 37.4 vs 46.1; P ≤ .001); otherwise, no differences in demographic, injury, or surgical variables between groups were noted. Regarding outcome measures, the BTB group achieved a higher Tegner score (6.0 vs 4.2; P = .004), and there was no other difference between groups. Of the patients who did not return to soccer, 44.7% reported fear as the reason. Of the patients who did return to soccer, 31.9% sustained another ACL injury (retear or contralateral tear), with no differences in reinjury rates based on graft selection. CONCLUSION: Adolescent female soccer players undergoing ACL reconstruction had relatively high satisfaction and outcome scores independent of autograft choice. Notwithstanding, patients and families need to be counseled that less than half of patients will return to their preinjury level of sport and, if an athlete attempts to return, there is a high risk of further ACL injury. SAGE Publications 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7708716/ /pubmed/33294473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120964884 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Britt, Elise
Ouillette, Ryan
Edmonds, Eric
Chambers, Henry
Johnson, Kristina
Bastrom, Tracey
Pennock, Andrew
The Challenges of Treating Female Soccer Players With ACL Injuries: Hamstring Versus Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Autograft
title The Challenges of Treating Female Soccer Players With ACL Injuries: Hamstring Versus Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Autograft
title_full The Challenges of Treating Female Soccer Players With ACL Injuries: Hamstring Versus Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Autograft
title_fullStr The Challenges of Treating Female Soccer Players With ACL Injuries: Hamstring Versus Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Autograft
title_full_unstemmed The Challenges of Treating Female Soccer Players With ACL Injuries: Hamstring Versus Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Autograft
title_short The Challenges of Treating Female Soccer Players With ACL Injuries: Hamstring Versus Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Autograft
title_sort challenges of treating female soccer players with acl injuries: hamstring versus bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120964884
work_keys_str_mv AT brittelise thechallengesoftreatingfemalesoccerplayerswithaclinjurieshamstringversusbonepatellartendonboneautograft
AT ouilletteryan thechallengesoftreatingfemalesoccerplayerswithaclinjurieshamstringversusbonepatellartendonboneautograft
AT edmondseric thechallengesoftreatingfemalesoccerplayerswithaclinjurieshamstringversusbonepatellartendonboneautograft
AT chambershenry thechallengesoftreatingfemalesoccerplayerswithaclinjurieshamstringversusbonepatellartendonboneautograft
AT johnsonkristina thechallengesoftreatingfemalesoccerplayerswithaclinjurieshamstringversusbonepatellartendonboneautograft
AT bastromtracey thechallengesoftreatingfemalesoccerplayerswithaclinjurieshamstringversusbonepatellartendonboneautograft
AT pennockandrew thechallengesoftreatingfemalesoccerplayerswithaclinjurieshamstringversusbonepatellartendonboneautograft
AT brittelise challengesoftreatingfemalesoccerplayerswithaclinjurieshamstringversusbonepatellartendonboneautograft
AT ouilletteryan challengesoftreatingfemalesoccerplayerswithaclinjurieshamstringversusbonepatellartendonboneautograft
AT edmondseric challengesoftreatingfemalesoccerplayerswithaclinjurieshamstringversusbonepatellartendonboneautograft
AT chambershenry challengesoftreatingfemalesoccerplayerswithaclinjurieshamstringversusbonepatellartendonboneautograft
AT johnsonkristina challengesoftreatingfemalesoccerplayerswithaclinjurieshamstringversusbonepatellartendonboneautograft
AT bastromtracey challengesoftreatingfemalesoccerplayerswithaclinjurieshamstringversusbonepatellartendonboneautograft
AT pennockandrew challengesoftreatingfemalesoccerplayerswithaclinjurieshamstringversusbonepatellartendonboneautograft