Cargando…

Migration and family planning in the state with highest total fertility rate in India

BACKGROUND: This study examined the relationship between male out-migration and family planning (FP) behaviour of women in rural Bihar. METHODS: Data was collected from 937 currently married women aged 15–34 years from two districts of Bihar, namely Nawada and Gopalganj. Respondents were selected th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahapatra, Bidhubhusan, Saggurti, Niranjan, Mishra, Raman, Walia, Monika, Mukherjee, Saradiya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09906-9
_version_ 1783617638273908736
author Mahapatra, Bidhubhusan
Saggurti, Niranjan
Mishra, Raman
Walia, Monika
Mukherjee, Saradiya
author_facet Mahapatra, Bidhubhusan
Saggurti, Niranjan
Mishra, Raman
Walia, Monika
Mukherjee, Saradiya
author_sort Mahapatra, Bidhubhusan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study examined the relationship between male out-migration and family planning (FP) behaviour of women in rural Bihar. METHODS: Data was collected from 937 currently married women aged 15–34 years from two districts of Bihar, namely Nawada and Gopalganj. Respondents were selected through a multi-stage systematic sampling and were recruited from both low and high male out-migration blocks. Differences in FP outcomes—use of modern contraceptive methods, intention to use contraceptives in next 12 months and access to FP services—were assessed by volume of migration, husband’s migration status, frequency of return, and duration of husband’s stay at home during visits. RESULTS: Women with migrant husbands were about 50% less likely to use modern contraceptive methods. Further, the odds of using modern contraceptives was about half among women with migrant husbands if they resided in high out-migration areas (HMA) than low out-migration areas (LMA) (15% vs 29%, AOR: 0·50, p = 0·017). A higher proportion of women with migrant husbands, specifically from HMA, reported greater intention of using contraceptives in next 12 months than their counterparts (37% vs 23%, AOR: 1·83, p = 0·015). Similarly, access to FP services was negatively associated with the volume of male out-migration, specifically for women with migrant husbands. CONCLUSIONS: The migratory environment as well as the migration of husbands affect contraceptive use and access to FP services among women. Given that a significant proportion of married males leave their home states for work, it is imperative that FP programs in migration affected areas plan and implement migration-centric FP implementation strategies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-020-09906-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7708902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77089022020-12-02 Migration and family planning in the state with highest total fertility rate in India Mahapatra, Bidhubhusan Saggurti, Niranjan Mishra, Raman Walia, Monika Mukherjee, Saradiya BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: This study examined the relationship between male out-migration and family planning (FP) behaviour of women in rural Bihar. METHODS: Data was collected from 937 currently married women aged 15–34 years from two districts of Bihar, namely Nawada and Gopalganj. Respondents were selected through a multi-stage systematic sampling and were recruited from both low and high male out-migration blocks. Differences in FP outcomes—use of modern contraceptive methods, intention to use contraceptives in next 12 months and access to FP services—were assessed by volume of migration, husband’s migration status, frequency of return, and duration of husband’s stay at home during visits. RESULTS: Women with migrant husbands were about 50% less likely to use modern contraceptive methods. Further, the odds of using modern contraceptives was about half among women with migrant husbands if they resided in high out-migration areas (HMA) than low out-migration areas (LMA) (15% vs 29%, AOR: 0·50, p = 0·017). A higher proportion of women with migrant husbands, specifically from HMA, reported greater intention of using contraceptives in next 12 months than their counterparts (37% vs 23%, AOR: 1·83, p = 0·015). Similarly, access to FP services was negatively associated with the volume of male out-migration, specifically for women with migrant husbands. CONCLUSIONS: The migratory environment as well as the migration of husbands affect contraceptive use and access to FP services among women. Given that a significant proportion of married males leave their home states for work, it is imperative that FP programs in migration affected areas plan and implement migration-centric FP implementation strategies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-020-09906-9. BioMed Central 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7708902/ /pubmed/33256666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09906-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mahapatra, Bidhubhusan
Saggurti, Niranjan
Mishra, Raman
Walia, Monika
Mukherjee, Saradiya
Migration and family planning in the state with highest total fertility rate in India
title Migration and family planning in the state with highest total fertility rate in India
title_full Migration and family planning in the state with highest total fertility rate in India
title_fullStr Migration and family planning in the state with highest total fertility rate in India
title_full_unstemmed Migration and family planning in the state with highest total fertility rate in India
title_short Migration and family planning in the state with highest total fertility rate in India
title_sort migration and family planning in the state with highest total fertility rate in india
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09906-9
work_keys_str_mv AT mahapatrabidhubhusan migrationandfamilyplanninginthestatewithhighesttotalfertilityrateinindia
AT saggurtiniranjan migrationandfamilyplanninginthestatewithhighesttotalfertilityrateinindia
AT mishraraman migrationandfamilyplanninginthestatewithhighesttotalfertilityrateinindia
AT waliamonika migrationandfamilyplanninginthestatewithhighesttotalfertilityrateinindia
AT mukherjeesaradiya migrationandfamilyplanninginthestatewithhighesttotalfertilityrateinindia