Cargando…
Reporting of Hybrid Data and the Difficulties with Cross-Discipline Research Techniques
Peer review is the way in which we, as scientists, criticise, check, and confirm the findings of our colleagues. The process of peer review relies on individuals in all fields applying their particular expertise and determining if they agree with the findings submitted for publication. In recent yea...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33238372 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/proteomes8040035 |
_version_ | 1783617686372089856 |
---|---|
author | O’Rourke, Matthew B. Padula, Matthew P. |
author_facet | O’Rourke, Matthew B. Padula, Matthew P. |
author_sort | O’Rourke, Matthew B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Peer review is the way in which we, as scientists, criticise, check, and confirm the findings of our colleagues. The process of peer review relies on individuals in all fields applying their particular expertise and determining if they agree with the findings submitted for publication. In recent years, there has been a significant rise in the number of manuscripts submitted for publication that draw from a range of disparate and complementary fields. This has created the curious situation where an expert may be requested to review a manuscript that is only partially within their immediate field of expertise. The issue that arises is that, without full knowledge of the data, techniques, methodologies, and principles that are presented, it is difficult for reviewers to make properly informed decisions, especially when it can take an entire career to reach that specific level of expertise in a single field. From this perspective, we explore these issues and also provide a commentary on how peer review could evolve in the context of a changing cross-disciplinarily-focused scientific landscape. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7709122 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77091222020-12-03 Reporting of Hybrid Data and the Difficulties with Cross-Discipline Research Techniques O’Rourke, Matthew B. Padula, Matthew P. Proteomes Commentary Peer review is the way in which we, as scientists, criticise, check, and confirm the findings of our colleagues. The process of peer review relies on individuals in all fields applying their particular expertise and determining if they agree with the findings submitted for publication. In recent years, there has been a significant rise in the number of manuscripts submitted for publication that draw from a range of disparate and complementary fields. This has created the curious situation where an expert may be requested to review a manuscript that is only partially within their immediate field of expertise. The issue that arises is that, without full knowledge of the data, techniques, methodologies, and principles that are presented, it is difficult for reviewers to make properly informed decisions, especially when it can take an entire career to reach that specific level of expertise in a single field. From this perspective, we explore these issues and also provide a commentary on how peer review could evolve in the context of a changing cross-disciplinarily-focused scientific landscape. MDPI 2020-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7709122/ /pubmed/33238372 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/proteomes8040035 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Commentary O’Rourke, Matthew B. Padula, Matthew P. Reporting of Hybrid Data and the Difficulties with Cross-Discipline Research Techniques |
title | Reporting of Hybrid Data and the Difficulties with Cross-Discipline Research Techniques |
title_full | Reporting of Hybrid Data and the Difficulties with Cross-Discipline Research Techniques |
title_fullStr | Reporting of Hybrid Data and the Difficulties with Cross-Discipline Research Techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Reporting of Hybrid Data and the Difficulties with Cross-Discipline Research Techniques |
title_short | Reporting of Hybrid Data and the Difficulties with Cross-Discipline Research Techniques |
title_sort | reporting of hybrid data and the difficulties with cross-discipline research techniques |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33238372 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/proteomes8040035 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT orourkematthewb reportingofhybriddataandthedifficultieswithcrossdisciplineresearchtechniques AT padulamatthewp reportingofhybriddataandthedifficultieswithcrossdisciplineresearchtechniques |