Cargando…
A modified Delphi study to gain consensus for a taxonomy to report and classify physical activity referral schemes (PARS)
BACKGROUND: Physical Activity Referral Schemes (PARS), including exercise referral schemes, are a popular approach to health improvement, but understanding of effectiveness is limited by considerable heterogeneity in reporting and evaluation. We aimed to gain consensus for a PARS taxonomy as a compr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33267840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-01050-2 |
_version_ | 1783617713317347328 |
---|---|
author | Hanson, Coral L. Oliver, Emily J. Dodd-Reynolds, Caroline J. Pearsons, Alice Kelly, Paul |
author_facet | Hanson, Coral L. Oliver, Emily J. Dodd-Reynolds, Caroline J. Pearsons, Alice Kelly, Paul |
author_sort | Hanson, Coral L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Physical Activity Referral Schemes (PARS), including exercise referral schemes, are a popular approach to health improvement, but understanding of effectiveness is limited by considerable heterogeneity in reporting and evaluation. We aimed to gain consensus for a PARS taxonomy as a comprehensive method for reporting and recording of such schemes. METHODS: We invited 62 experts from PARS policy, research and practice to complete a modified Delphi study. In round one, participants rated the need for a PARS taxonomy, the suitability of three proposed classification levels and commented on proposed elements. In round two, participants rated proposed taxonomy elements on an 11-point Likert scale. Elements scoring a median of ≥7, indicating high agreement, were included in the final taxonomy. RESULTS: Of those invited, 47 (75.8%) participated in round one, with high retention in round two (n = 43; 91.5%). 42 were UK-based, meaning the resultant taxonomy has been scrutinised for fit to the UK context only. The study gained consensus for a three-level taxonomy: Level 1: PARS classification (primary classification, provider, setting, conditions accepted [have or at risk of], activity type and funding). Level 2: scheme characteristics (staff structure, staff qualifications, behaviour change theories, behaviour change techniques, referral source, referrers, referral process, scheme duration, session frequency, session length, session times, session type, exit routes, action in case of non-attendance, baseline assessment, exit assessment, feedback to referrer and exclusion criteria) and Level 3: participant measures (demographics, monitoring and evaluation, and measures of change). CONCLUSION: Using a modified Delphi method, this study developed UK-based consensus on a PARS classification taxonomy. We encourage PARS practitioners and public health colleagues, especially those working with similar service models internationally, to test, refine and use this taxonomy to inform policy and practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-020-01050-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7709269 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77092692020-12-02 A modified Delphi study to gain consensus for a taxonomy to report and classify physical activity referral schemes (PARS) Hanson, Coral L. Oliver, Emily J. Dodd-Reynolds, Caroline J. Pearsons, Alice Kelly, Paul Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Physical Activity Referral Schemes (PARS), including exercise referral schemes, are a popular approach to health improvement, but understanding of effectiveness is limited by considerable heterogeneity in reporting and evaluation. We aimed to gain consensus for a PARS taxonomy as a comprehensive method for reporting and recording of such schemes. METHODS: We invited 62 experts from PARS policy, research and practice to complete a modified Delphi study. In round one, participants rated the need for a PARS taxonomy, the suitability of three proposed classification levels and commented on proposed elements. In round two, participants rated proposed taxonomy elements on an 11-point Likert scale. Elements scoring a median of ≥7, indicating high agreement, were included in the final taxonomy. RESULTS: Of those invited, 47 (75.8%) participated in round one, with high retention in round two (n = 43; 91.5%). 42 were UK-based, meaning the resultant taxonomy has been scrutinised for fit to the UK context only. The study gained consensus for a three-level taxonomy: Level 1: PARS classification (primary classification, provider, setting, conditions accepted [have or at risk of], activity type and funding). Level 2: scheme characteristics (staff structure, staff qualifications, behaviour change theories, behaviour change techniques, referral source, referrers, referral process, scheme duration, session frequency, session length, session times, session type, exit routes, action in case of non-attendance, baseline assessment, exit assessment, feedback to referrer and exclusion criteria) and Level 3: participant measures (demographics, monitoring and evaluation, and measures of change). CONCLUSION: Using a modified Delphi method, this study developed UK-based consensus on a PARS classification taxonomy. We encourage PARS practitioners and public health colleagues, especially those working with similar service models internationally, to test, refine and use this taxonomy to inform policy and practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-020-01050-2. BioMed Central 2020-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7709269/ /pubmed/33267840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-01050-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Hanson, Coral L. Oliver, Emily J. Dodd-Reynolds, Caroline J. Pearsons, Alice Kelly, Paul A modified Delphi study to gain consensus for a taxonomy to report and classify physical activity referral schemes (PARS) |
title | A modified Delphi study to gain consensus for a taxonomy to report and classify physical activity referral schemes (PARS) |
title_full | A modified Delphi study to gain consensus for a taxonomy to report and classify physical activity referral schemes (PARS) |
title_fullStr | A modified Delphi study to gain consensus for a taxonomy to report and classify physical activity referral schemes (PARS) |
title_full_unstemmed | A modified Delphi study to gain consensus for a taxonomy to report and classify physical activity referral schemes (PARS) |
title_short | A modified Delphi study to gain consensus for a taxonomy to report and classify physical activity referral schemes (PARS) |
title_sort | modified delphi study to gain consensus for a taxonomy to report and classify physical activity referral schemes (pars) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33267840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-01050-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hansoncorall amodifieddelphistudytogainconsensusforataxonomytoreportandclassifyphysicalactivityreferralschemespars AT oliveremilyj amodifieddelphistudytogainconsensusforataxonomytoreportandclassifyphysicalactivityreferralschemespars AT doddreynoldscarolinej amodifieddelphistudytogainconsensusforataxonomytoreportandclassifyphysicalactivityreferralschemespars AT pearsonsalice amodifieddelphistudytogainconsensusforataxonomytoreportandclassifyphysicalactivityreferralschemespars AT kellypaul amodifieddelphistudytogainconsensusforataxonomytoreportandclassifyphysicalactivityreferralschemespars AT hansoncorall modifieddelphistudytogainconsensusforataxonomytoreportandclassifyphysicalactivityreferralschemespars AT oliveremilyj modifieddelphistudytogainconsensusforataxonomytoreportandclassifyphysicalactivityreferralschemespars AT doddreynoldscarolinej modifieddelphistudytogainconsensusforataxonomytoreportandclassifyphysicalactivityreferralschemespars AT pearsonsalice modifieddelphistudytogainconsensusforataxonomytoreportandclassifyphysicalactivityreferralschemespars AT kellypaul modifieddelphistudytogainconsensusforataxonomytoreportandclassifyphysicalactivityreferralschemespars |