Cargando…
What is the minimum response rate on patient-reported outcome measures needed to adequately evaluate total hip arthroplasties?
BACKGROUND: Unknown is which response rate on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is needed to both obtain an accurate outcome and ensure generalizability in evaluating total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures. Without an evidence based minimum response rate (MRR) on THA PROMs, it is possible t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33267842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01628-1 |
_version_ | 1783617729955102720 |
---|---|
author | Pronk, Yvette van der Weegen, Walter Vos, Rein Brinkman, Justus-Martijn van Heerwaarden, Ronald Johannes Pilot, Peter |
author_facet | Pronk, Yvette van der Weegen, Walter Vos, Rein Brinkman, Justus-Martijn van Heerwaarden, Ronald Johannes Pilot, Peter |
author_sort | Pronk, Yvette |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Unknown is which response rate on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is needed to both obtain an accurate outcome and ensure generalizability in evaluating total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures. Without an evidence based minimum response rate (MRR) on THA PROMs, it is possible that hospitals report invalid patient-reported outcomes (PROs) due to a too low response rate. Alternatively, hospitals may invest too much in achieving an unnecessary high response rate. The aim of this study is to gain an insight into the MRR on PROMs needed to adequately evaluate THA procedures from a clinical perspective. METHODS: Retrospective study on prospective collected data of primary, elective THA procedures was performed. MRR was investigated for each PROM (NRS pain at rest, NRS pain during activity, EQ-5D-3L, HOOS-PS, anchor function, OHS, anchor pain and NRS satisfaction) separately to calculate the primary outcome: MRR for the THA PROMs set. MRR on a PROM needed to have (condition 1.) similar PRO change score (3 month score minus preoperative score) including confidence interval, (condition 2.) maintaining the influence of each change score predictor and (condition 3.) equal distribution of each predictor, as those of a 100% PROM response rate group. Per PROM, a 100%-group was identified with all patients having the PRO change score. Randomly assessed groups of 90% till 10% response rate (in total 90 groups) were compared with the 100%-group. Linear mixed model analyses and linear regressions were executed. RESULTS: The MRR for the THA PROMs set was 100% (range: 70–100% per PROM). The first condition resulted in a MRR of 60%, the second condition in a MRR of 100% and the third condition in a MRR of 10%. CONCLUSIONS: A 100% response rate on PROMs is needed in order to adequately evaluate THA procedures from a clinical perspective. All stakeholders using THA PROs should be aware that 100% of the THA patients should respond on both preoperative and 3 month postoperative PROMs. For now, taking the first step in improving evaluation of THA for quality control by achieving at least two of the three conditions of MRR, advised is to require a response rate on PROMs of 60% as the lower limit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7709349 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77093492020-12-02 What is the minimum response rate on patient-reported outcome measures needed to adequately evaluate total hip arthroplasties? Pronk, Yvette van der Weegen, Walter Vos, Rein Brinkman, Justus-Martijn van Heerwaarden, Ronald Johannes Pilot, Peter Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Unknown is which response rate on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is needed to both obtain an accurate outcome and ensure generalizability in evaluating total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures. Without an evidence based minimum response rate (MRR) on THA PROMs, it is possible that hospitals report invalid patient-reported outcomes (PROs) due to a too low response rate. Alternatively, hospitals may invest too much in achieving an unnecessary high response rate. The aim of this study is to gain an insight into the MRR on PROMs needed to adequately evaluate THA procedures from a clinical perspective. METHODS: Retrospective study on prospective collected data of primary, elective THA procedures was performed. MRR was investigated for each PROM (NRS pain at rest, NRS pain during activity, EQ-5D-3L, HOOS-PS, anchor function, OHS, anchor pain and NRS satisfaction) separately to calculate the primary outcome: MRR for the THA PROMs set. MRR on a PROM needed to have (condition 1.) similar PRO change score (3 month score minus preoperative score) including confidence interval, (condition 2.) maintaining the influence of each change score predictor and (condition 3.) equal distribution of each predictor, as those of a 100% PROM response rate group. Per PROM, a 100%-group was identified with all patients having the PRO change score. Randomly assessed groups of 90% till 10% response rate (in total 90 groups) were compared with the 100%-group. Linear mixed model analyses and linear regressions were executed. RESULTS: The MRR for the THA PROMs set was 100% (range: 70–100% per PROM). The first condition resulted in a MRR of 60%, the second condition in a MRR of 100% and the third condition in a MRR of 10%. CONCLUSIONS: A 100% response rate on PROMs is needed in order to adequately evaluate THA procedures from a clinical perspective. All stakeholders using THA PROs should be aware that 100% of the THA patients should respond on both preoperative and 3 month postoperative PROMs. For now, taking the first step in improving evaluation of THA for quality control by achieving at least two of the three conditions of MRR, advised is to require a response rate on PROMs of 60% as the lower limit. BioMed Central 2020-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7709349/ /pubmed/33267842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01628-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Pronk, Yvette van der Weegen, Walter Vos, Rein Brinkman, Justus-Martijn van Heerwaarden, Ronald Johannes Pilot, Peter What is the minimum response rate on patient-reported outcome measures needed to adequately evaluate total hip arthroplasties? |
title | What is the minimum response rate on patient-reported outcome measures needed to adequately evaluate total hip arthroplasties? |
title_full | What is the minimum response rate on patient-reported outcome measures needed to adequately evaluate total hip arthroplasties? |
title_fullStr | What is the minimum response rate on patient-reported outcome measures needed to adequately evaluate total hip arthroplasties? |
title_full_unstemmed | What is the minimum response rate on patient-reported outcome measures needed to adequately evaluate total hip arthroplasties? |
title_short | What is the minimum response rate on patient-reported outcome measures needed to adequately evaluate total hip arthroplasties? |
title_sort | what is the minimum response rate on patient-reported outcome measures needed to adequately evaluate total hip arthroplasties? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33267842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01628-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pronkyvette whatistheminimumresponserateonpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresneededtoadequatelyevaluatetotalhiparthroplasties AT vanderweegenwalter whatistheminimumresponserateonpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresneededtoadequatelyevaluatetotalhiparthroplasties AT vosrein whatistheminimumresponserateonpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresneededtoadequatelyevaluatetotalhiparthroplasties AT brinkmanjustusmartijn whatistheminimumresponserateonpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresneededtoadequatelyevaluatetotalhiparthroplasties AT vanheerwaardenronaldjohannes whatistheminimumresponserateonpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresneededtoadequatelyevaluatetotalhiparthroplasties AT pilotpeter whatistheminimumresponserateonpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresneededtoadequatelyevaluatetotalhiparthroplasties |