Cargando…

Obese patients and robotic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a major health problem, demonstrated to double the risk of colorectal cancer. The benefits of robotic colorectal surgery in obese patients remain largely unknown. This meta‐analysis evaluated the clinical and pathological outcomes of robotic colorectal surgery in obese and non...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suwa, Y., Joshi, M., Poynter, L., Endo, I., Ashrafian, H., Darzi, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32955800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50335
_version_ 1783617733791842304
author Suwa, Y.
Joshi, M.
Poynter, L.
Endo, I.
Ashrafian, H.
Darzi, A.
author_facet Suwa, Y.
Joshi, M.
Poynter, L.
Endo, I.
Ashrafian, H.
Darzi, A.
author_sort Suwa, Y.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Obesity is a major health problem, demonstrated to double the risk of colorectal cancer. The benefits of robotic colorectal surgery in obese patients remain largely unknown. This meta‐analysis evaluated the clinical and pathological outcomes of robotic colorectal surgery in obese and non‐obese patients. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, Healthcare Management Information Consortium (HMIC) and Midwives Information and Resources Service (MIDIRS) databases were searched on 1 August 2018 with no language restriction. Meta‐analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Obese patients (BMI 30 kg/m(2) or above) undergoing robotic colorectal cancer resections were compared with non‐obese patients. Included outcome measures were: operative outcomes (duration of surgery, conversion to laparotomy, blood loss), postoperative complications, hospital length of stay and pathological outcomes (number of retrieved lymph nodes, positive circumferential resection margins and length of distal margin in rectal surgery). RESULTS: A total of 131 full‐text articles were reviewed, of which 12 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. There were 3166 non‐obese and 1420 obese patients. A longer duration of surgery was documented in obese compared with non‐obese patients (weighted mean difference −21·99 (95 per cent c.i. −31·52 to −12·46) min; P < 0·001). Obese patients had a higher rate of conversion to laparotomy than non‐obese patients (odds ratio 1·99, 95 per cent c.i. 1·54 to 2·56; P < 0·001). Blood loss, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and pathological outcomes were not significantly different in obese and non‐obese patients. CONCLUSION: Robotic surgery in obese patients results in a significantly longer duration of surgery and higher conversion rates than in non‐obese patients. Further studies should focus on better stratification of the obese population with colorectal disease as candidates for robotic procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7709366
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77093662020-12-09 Obese patients and robotic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta‐analysis Suwa, Y. Joshi, M. Poynter, L. Endo, I. Ashrafian, H. Darzi, A. BJS Open Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Obesity is a major health problem, demonstrated to double the risk of colorectal cancer. The benefits of robotic colorectal surgery in obese patients remain largely unknown. This meta‐analysis evaluated the clinical and pathological outcomes of robotic colorectal surgery in obese and non‐obese patients. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, Healthcare Management Information Consortium (HMIC) and Midwives Information and Resources Service (MIDIRS) databases were searched on 1 August 2018 with no language restriction. Meta‐analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Obese patients (BMI 30 kg/m(2) or above) undergoing robotic colorectal cancer resections were compared with non‐obese patients. Included outcome measures were: operative outcomes (duration of surgery, conversion to laparotomy, blood loss), postoperative complications, hospital length of stay and pathological outcomes (number of retrieved lymph nodes, positive circumferential resection margins and length of distal margin in rectal surgery). RESULTS: A total of 131 full‐text articles were reviewed, of which 12 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. There were 3166 non‐obese and 1420 obese patients. A longer duration of surgery was documented in obese compared with non‐obese patients (weighted mean difference −21·99 (95 per cent c.i. −31·52 to −12·46) min; P < 0·001). Obese patients had a higher rate of conversion to laparotomy than non‐obese patients (odds ratio 1·99, 95 per cent c.i. 1·54 to 2·56; P < 0·001). Blood loss, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and pathological outcomes were not significantly different in obese and non‐obese patients. CONCLUSION: Robotic surgery in obese patients results in a significantly longer duration of surgery and higher conversion rates than in non‐obese patients. Further studies should focus on better stratification of the obese population with colorectal disease as candidates for robotic procedures. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2020-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7709366/ /pubmed/32955800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50335 Text en © 2020 The Authors. BJS Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Journal of Surgery Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Suwa, Y.
Joshi, M.
Poynter, L.
Endo, I.
Ashrafian, H.
Darzi, A.
Obese patients and robotic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Obese patients and robotic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Obese patients and robotic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Obese patients and robotic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Obese patients and robotic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Obese patients and robotic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort obese patients and robotic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32955800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50335
work_keys_str_mv AT suway obesepatientsandroboticcolorectalsurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT joshim obesepatientsandroboticcolorectalsurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT poynterl obesepatientsandroboticcolorectalsurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT endoi obesepatientsandroboticcolorectalsurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ashrafianh obesepatientsandroboticcolorectalsurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT darzia obesepatientsandroboticcolorectalsurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis