Cargando…

Evaluating the responsiveness of higher education system in relation to social determinants of health

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To answer the society's health-care needs related to social determinants of health (SDH), higher education system must be responsive in training knowledgeable students and faculty members. Therefore, this study was carried out to determine the responsiveness of higher educat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Samouei, Rahele, Heidari, Kamal, Saghaeiannejad, Sakineh, Karami, Sedigheh, Aghdak, Pejman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33282996
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_80_20
_version_ 1783617819229814784
author Samouei, Rahele
Heidari, Kamal
Saghaeiannejad, Sakineh
Karami, Sedigheh
Aghdak, Pejman
author_facet Samouei, Rahele
Heidari, Kamal
Saghaeiannejad, Sakineh
Karami, Sedigheh
Aghdak, Pejman
author_sort Samouei, Rahele
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: To answer the society's health-care needs related to social determinants of health (SDH), higher education system must be responsive in training knowledgeable students and faculty members. Therefore, this study was carried out to determine the responsiveness of higher education system in relation to the SDH. METHODS: This is a content analysis study carried out using qualitative approach. Semi-structured interviews were used to gain access to the knowledge of experts in the fields of health care, education, and SDH. Sampling was carried out until data saturation was achieved during which 15 experts were selected using purposeful sampling method with highest possible variety. Data were categorized using qualitative content analysis approach. RESULTS: In total, 11 themes and 43 categories of codes were identified in semi-structured interviews with experts. A total of two approaches were identified for the training of responsive students including educational–research approach and cultural–social approach; five approaches were identified for the development of faculty members including cognitive development, executive development, evaluation, promotion and incentives, and revisions; two approaches were identified for provision of theoretical and practical education including education in a real and active environment and structural education; and finally, two approaches were identified for evaluation of students and faculty members in regard to their responsiveness to society's health needs and SDH including content and operational approaches. CONCLUSION: In general, the results of the current study indicate the need for the higher education system to use educational, research, and society-based approaches in real and social environments along with an incentive system and use of evaluation for responsiveness to society's health needs and SDH. These results can be useful for the health-care system and the higher education system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7709764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77097642020-12-03 Evaluating the responsiveness of higher education system in relation to social determinants of health Samouei, Rahele Heidari, Kamal Saghaeiannejad, Sakineh Karami, Sedigheh Aghdak, Pejman J Educ Health Promot Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIM: To answer the society's health-care needs related to social determinants of health (SDH), higher education system must be responsive in training knowledgeable students and faculty members. Therefore, this study was carried out to determine the responsiveness of higher education system in relation to the SDH. METHODS: This is a content analysis study carried out using qualitative approach. Semi-structured interviews were used to gain access to the knowledge of experts in the fields of health care, education, and SDH. Sampling was carried out until data saturation was achieved during which 15 experts were selected using purposeful sampling method with highest possible variety. Data were categorized using qualitative content analysis approach. RESULTS: In total, 11 themes and 43 categories of codes were identified in semi-structured interviews with experts. A total of two approaches were identified for the training of responsive students including educational–research approach and cultural–social approach; five approaches were identified for the development of faculty members including cognitive development, executive development, evaluation, promotion and incentives, and revisions; two approaches were identified for provision of theoretical and practical education including education in a real and active environment and structural education; and finally, two approaches were identified for evaluation of students and faculty members in regard to their responsiveness to society's health needs and SDH including content and operational approaches. CONCLUSION: In general, the results of the current study indicate the need for the higher education system to use educational, research, and society-based approaches in real and social environments along with an incentive system and use of evaluation for responsiveness to society's health needs and SDH. These results can be useful for the health-care system and the higher education system. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7709764/ /pubmed/33282996 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_80_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Education and Health Promotion http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Samouei, Rahele
Heidari, Kamal
Saghaeiannejad, Sakineh
Karami, Sedigheh
Aghdak, Pejman
Evaluating the responsiveness of higher education system in relation to social determinants of health
title Evaluating the responsiveness of higher education system in relation to social determinants of health
title_full Evaluating the responsiveness of higher education system in relation to social determinants of health
title_fullStr Evaluating the responsiveness of higher education system in relation to social determinants of health
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the responsiveness of higher education system in relation to social determinants of health
title_short Evaluating the responsiveness of higher education system in relation to social determinants of health
title_sort evaluating the responsiveness of higher education system in relation to social determinants of health
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33282996
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_80_20
work_keys_str_mv AT samoueirahele evaluatingtheresponsivenessofhighereducationsysteminrelationtosocialdeterminantsofhealth
AT heidarikamal evaluatingtheresponsivenessofhighereducationsysteminrelationtosocialdeterminantsofhealth
AT saghaeiannejadsakineh evaluatingtheresponsivenessofhighereducationsysteminrelationtosocialdeterminantsofhealth
AT karamisedigheh evaluatingtheresponsivenessofhighereducationsysteminrelationtosocialdeterminantsofhealth
AT aghdakpejman evaluatingtheresponsivenessofhighereducationsysteminrelationtosocialdeterminantsofhealth