Cargando…
Applying the electronic nose for pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 screening
BACKGROUND: Infection with SARS-CoV-2 causes corona virus disease (COVID-19). The most standard diagnostic method is reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on a nasopharyngeal and/or an oropharyngeal swab. The high occurrence of false-negative results due to the non-presence of SAR...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33269428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08169-0 |
_version_ | 1783617826728181760 |
---|---|
author | Wintjens, Anne G. W. E. Hintzen, Kim F. H. Engelen, Sanne M. E. Lubbers, Tim Savelkoul, Paul H. M. Wesseling, Geertjan van der Palen, Job A. M. Bouvy, Nicole D. |
author_facet | Wintjens, Anne G. W. E. Hintzen, Kim F. H. Engelen, Sanne M. E. Lubbers, Tim Savelkoul, Paul H. M. Wesseling, Geertjan van der Palen, Job A. M. Bouvy, Nicole D. |
author_sort | Wintjens, Anne G. W. E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Infection with SARS-CoV-2 causes corona virus disease (COVID-19). The most standard diagnostic method is reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on a nasopharyngeal and/or an oropharyngeal swab. The high occurrence of false-negative results due to the non-presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the oropharyngeal environment renders this sampling method not ideal. Therefore, a new sampling device is desirable. This proof-of-principle study investigated the possibility to train machine-learning classifiers with an electronic nose (Aeonose) to differentiate between COVID-19-positive and negative persons based on volatile organic compounds (VOCs) analysis. METHODS: Between April and June 2020, participants were invited for breath analysis when a swab for RT-PCR was collected. If the RT-PCR resulted negative, the presence of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies was checked to confirm the negative result. All participants breathed through the Aeonose for five minutes. This device contains metal-oxide sensors that change in conductivity upon reaction with VOCs in exhaled breath. These conductivity changes are input data for machine learning and used for pattern recognition. The result is a value between − 1 and + 1, indicating the infection probability. RESULTS: 219 participants were included, 57 of which COVID-19 positive. A sensitivity of 0.86 and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.92 were found. Adding clinical variables to machine-learning classifier via multivariate logistic regression analysis, the NPV improved to 0.96. CONCLUSIONS: The Aeonose can distinguish COVID-19 positive from negative participants based on VOC patterns in exhaled breath with a high NPV. The Aeonose might be a promising, non-invasive, and low-cost triage tool for excluding SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients elected for surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7709806 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77098062020-12-03 Applying the electronic nose for pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 screening Wintjens, Anne G. W. E. Hintzen, Kim F. H. Engelen, Sanne M. E. Lubbers, Tim Savelkoul, Paul H. M. Wesseling, Geertjan van der Palen, Job A. M. Bouvy, Nicole D. Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Infection with SARS-CoV-2 causes corona virus disease (COVID-19). The most standard diagnostic method is reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on a nasopharyngeal and/or an oropharyngeal swab. The high occurrence of false-negative results due to the non-presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the oropharyngeal environment renders this sampling method not ideal. Therefore, a new sampling device is desirable. This proof-of-principle study investigated the possibility to train machine-learning classifiers with an electronic nose (Aeonose) to differentiate between COVID-19-positive and negative persons based on volatile organic compounds (VOCs) analysis. METHODS: Between April and June 2020, participants were invited for breath analysis when a swab for RT-PCR was collected. If the RT-PCR resulted negative, the presence of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies was checked to confirm the negative result. All participants breathed through the Aeonose for five minutes. This device contains metal-oxide sensors that change in conductivity upon reaction with VOCs in exhaled breath. These conductivity changes are input data for machine learning and used for pattern recognition. The result is a value between − 1 and + 1, indicating the infection probability. RESULTS: 219 participants were included, 57 of which COVID-19 positive. A sensitivity of 0.86 and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.92 were found. Adding clinical variables to machine-learning classifier via multivariate logistic regression analysis, the NPV improved to 0.96. CONCLUSIONS: The Aeonose can distinguish COVID-19 positive from negative participants based on VOC patterns in exhaled breath with a high NPV. The Aeonose might be a promising, non-invasive, and low-cost triage tool for excluding SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients elected for surgery. Springer US 2020-12-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7709806/ /pubmed/33269428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08169-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Wintjens, Anne G. W. E. Hintzen, Kim F. H. Engelen, Sanne M. E. Lubbers, Tim Savelkoul, Paul H. M. Wesseling, Geertjan van der Palen, Job A. M. Bouvy, Nicole D. Applying the electronic nose for pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 screening |
title | Applying the electronic nose for pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 screening |
title_full | Applying the electronic nose for pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 screening |
title_fullStr | Applying the electronic nose for pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Applying the electronic nose for pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 screening |
title_short | Applying the electronic nose for pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 screening |
title_sort | applying the electronic nose for pre-operative sars-cov-2 screening |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33269428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08169-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wintjensannegwe applyingtheelectronicnoseforpreoperativesarscov2screening AT hintzenkimfh applyingtheelectronicnoseforpreoperativesarscov2screening AT engelensanneme applyingtheelectronicnoseforpreoperativesarscov2screening AT lubberstim applyingtheelectronicnoseforpreoperativesarscov2screening AT savelkoulpaulhm applyingtheelectronicnoseforpreoperativesarscov2screening AT wesselinggeertjan applyingtheelectronicnoseforpreoperativesarscov2screening AT vanderpalenjobam applyingtheelectronicnoseforpreoperativesarscov2screening AT bouvynicoled applyingtheelectronicnoseforpreoperativesarscov2screening |