Cargando…

Applying the electronic nose for pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 screening

BACKGROUND: Infection with SARS-CoV-2 causes corona virus disease (COVID-19). The most standard diagnostic method is reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on a nasopharyngeal and/or an oropharyngeal swab. The high occurrence of false-negative results due to the non-presence of SAR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wintjens, Anne G. W. E., Hintzen, Kim F. H., Engelen, Sanne M. E., Lubbers, Tim, Savelkoul, Paul H. M., Wesseling, Geertjan, van der Palen, Job A. M., Bouvy, Nicole D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33269428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08169-0
_version_ 1783617826728181760
author Wintjens, Anne G. W. E.
Hintzen, Kim F. H.
Engelen, Sanne M. E.
Lubbers, Tim
Savelkoul, Paul H. M.
Wesseling, Geertjan
van der Palen, Job A. M.
Bouvy, Nicole D.
author_facet Wintjens, Anne G. W. E.
Hintzen, Kim F. H.
Engelen, Sanne M. E.
Lubbers, Tim
Savelkoul, Paul H. M.
Wesseling, Geertjan
van der Palen, Job A. M.
Bouvy, Nicole D.
author_sort Wintjens, Anne G. W. E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Infection with SARS-CoV-2 causes corona virus disease (COVID-19). The most standard diagnostic method is reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on a nasopharyngeal and/or an oropharyngeal swab. The high occurrence of false-negative results due to the non-presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the oropharyngeal environment renders this sampling method not ideal. Therefore, a new sampling device is desirable. This proof-of-principle study investigated the possibility to train machine-learning classifiers with an electronic nose (Aeonose) to differentiate between COVID-19-positive and negative persons based on volatile organic compounds (VOCs) analysis. METHODS: Between April and June 2020, participants were invited for breath analysis when a swab for RT-PCR was collected. If the RT-PCR resulted negative, the presence of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies was checked to confirm the negative result. All participants breathed through the Aeonose for five minutes. This device contains metal-oxide sensors that change in conductivity upon reaction with VOCs in exhaled breath. These conductivity changes are input data for machine learning and used for pattern recognition. The result is a value between − 1 and + 1, indicating the infection probability. RESULTS: 219 participants were included, 57 of which COVID-19 positive. A sensitivity of 0.86 and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.92 were found. Adding clinical variables to machine-learning classifier via multivariate logistic regression analysis, the NPV improved to 0.96. CONCLUSIONS: The Aeonose can distinguish COVID-19 positive from negative participants based on VOC patterns in exhaled breath with a high NPV. The Aeonose might be a promising, non-invasive, and low-cost triage tool for excluding SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients elected for surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7709806
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77098062020-12-03 Applying the electronic nose for pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 screening Wintjens, Anne G. W. E. Hintzen, Kim F. H. Engelen, Sanne M. E. Lubbers, Tim Savelkoul, Paul H. M. Wesseling, Geertjan van der Palen, Job A. M. Bouvy, Nicole D. Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Infection with SARS-CoV-2 causes corona virus disease (COVID-19). The most standard diagnostic method is reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on a nasopharyngeal and/or an oropharyngeal swab. The high occurrence of false-negative results due to the non-presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the oropharyngeal environment renders this sampling method not ideal. Therefore, a new sampling device is desirable. This proof-of-principle study investigated the possibility to train machine-learning classifiers with an electronic nose (Aeonose) to differentiate between COVID-19-positive and negative persons based on volatile organic compounds (VOCs) analysis. METHODS: Between April and June 2020, participants were invited for breath analysis when a swab for RT-PCR was collected. If the RT-PCR resulted negative, the presence of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies was checked to confirm the negative result. All participants breathed through the Aeonose for five minutes. This device contains metal-oxide sensors that change in conductivity upon reaction with VOCs in exhaled breath. These conductivity changes are input data for machine learning and used for pattern recognition. The result is a value between − 1 and + 1, indicating the infection probability. RESULTS: 219 participants were included, 57 of which COVID-19 positive. A sensitivity of 0.86 and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.92 were found. Adding clinical variables to machine-learning classifier via multivariate logistic regression analysis, the NPV improved to 0.96. CONCLUSIONS: The Aeonose can distinguish COVID-19 positive from negative participants based on VOC patterns in exhaled breath with a high NPV. The Aeonose might be a promising, non-invasive, and low-cost triage tool for excluding SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients elected for surgery. Springer US 2020-12-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7709806/ /pubmed/33269428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08169-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Wintjens, Anne G. W. E.
Hintzen, Kim F. H.
Engelen, Sanne M. E.
Lubbers, Tim
Savelkoul, Paul H. M.
Wesseling, Geertjan
van der Palen, Job A. M.
Bouvy, Nicole D.
Applying the electronic nose for pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 screening
title Applying the electronic nose for pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 screening
title_full Applying the electronic nose for pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 screening
title_fullStr Applying the electronic nose for pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 screening
title_full_unstemmed Applying the electronic nose for pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 screening
title_short Applying the electronic nose for pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 screening
title_sort applying the electronic nose for pre-operative sars-cov-2 screening
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33269428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08169-0
work_keys_str_mv AT wintjensannegwe applyingtheelectronicnoseforpreoperativesarscov2screening
AT hintzenkimfh applyingtheelectronicnoseforpreoperativesarscov2screening
AT engelensanneme applyingtheelectronicnoseforpreoperativesarscov2screening
AT lubberstim applyingtheelectronicnoseforpreoperativesarscov2screening
AT savelkoulpaulhm applyingtheelectronicnoseforpreoperativesarscov2screening
AT wesselinggeertjan applyingtheelectronicnoseforpreoperativesarscov2screening
AT vanderpalenjobam applyingtheelectronicnoseforpreoperativesarscov2screening
AT bouvynicoled applyingtheelectronicnoseforpreoperativesarscov2screening