Cargando…

Benefits and Disadvantages of Electronic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important in clinical practice and research. The growth of electronic health technologies provides unprecedented opportunities to systematically collect information via PROMs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide an objective and c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meirte, Jill, Hellemans, Nick, Anthonissen, Mieke, Denteneer, Lenie, Maertens, Koen, Moortgat, Peter, Van Daele, Ulrike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33393920
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15588
_version_ 1783617836883640320
author Meirte, Jill
Hellemans, Nick
Anthonissen, Mieke
Denteneer, Lenie
Maertens, Koen
Moortgat, Peter
Van Daele, Ulrike
author_facet Meirte, Jill
Hellemans, Nick
Anthonissen, Mieke
Denteneer, Lenie
Maertens, Koen
Moortgat, Peter
Van Daele, Ulrike
author_sort Meirte, Jill
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important in clinical practice and research. The growth of electronic health technologies provides unprecedented opportunities to systematically collect information via PROMs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide an objective and comprehensive overview of the benefits, barriers, and disadvantages of the digital collection of qualitative electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs). METHODS: We performed a systematic review of articles retrieved from PubMED and Web of Science. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed during all stages. The search strategy yielded a total of 2333 records, from which 32 met the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The relevant ePROM-related information was extracted from each study. RESULTS: Results were clustered as benefits and disadvantages. Reported benefits of ePROMs were greater patient preference and acceptability, lower costs, similar or faster completion time, higher data quality and response rates, and facilitated symptom management and patient-clinician communication. Tablets were the most used ePROM modality (14/32, 44%), and, as a platform, Web-based systems were used the most (26/32, 81%). Potential disadvantages of ePROMs include privacy protection, a possible large initial financial investment, and exclusion of certain populations or the “digital divide.” CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, ePROMs offer many advantages over paper-based collection of patient-reported outcomes. Overall, ePROMs are preferred over paper-based methods, improve data quality, result in similar or faster completion time, decrease costs, and facilitate clinical decision making and symptom management. Disadvantages regarding ePROMs have been outlined, and suggestions are provided to overcome the barriers. We provide a path forward for researchers and clinicians interested in implementing ePROMs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018094795; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=94795
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7709853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77098532020-12-17 Benefits and Disadvantages of Electronic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Systematic Review Meirte, Jill Hellemans, Nick Anthonissen, Mieke Denteneer, Lenie Maertens, Koen Moortgat, Peter Van Daele, Ulrike JMIR Perioper Med Review BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important in clinical practice and research. The growth of electronic health technologies provides unprecedented opportunities to systematically collect information via PROMs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide an objective and comprehensive overview of the benefits, barriers, and disadvantages of the digital collection of qualitative electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs). METHODS: We performed a systematic review of articles retrieved from PubMED and Web of Science. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed during all stages. The search strategy yielded a total of 2333 records, from which 32 met the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The relevant ePROM-related information was extracted from each study. RESULTS: Results were clustered as benefits and disadvantages. Reported benefits of ePROMs were greater patient preference and acceptability, lower costs, similar or faster completion time, higher data quality and response rates, and facilitated symptom management and patient-clinician communication. Tablets were the most used ePROM modality (14/32, 44%), and, as a platform, Web-based systems were used the most (26/32, 81%). Potential disadvantages of ePROMs include privacy protection, a possible large initial financial investment, and exclusion of certain populations or the “digital divide.” CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, ePROMs offer many advantages over paper-based collection of patient-reported outcomes. Overall, ePROMs are preferred over paper-based methods, improve data quality, result in similar or faster completion time, decrease costs, and facilitate clinical decision making and symptom management. Disadvantages regarding ePROMs have been outlined, and suggestions are provided to overcome the barriers. We provide a path forward for researchers and clinicians interested in implementing ePROMs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018094795; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=94795 JMIR Publications 2020-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7709853/ /pubmed/33393920 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15588 Text en ©Jill Meirte, Nick Hellemans, Mieke Anthonissen, Lenie Denteneer, Koen Maertens, Peter Moortgat, Ulrike Van Daele. Originally published in JMIR Perioperative Medicine (http://periop.jmir.org), 03.04.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Perioperative Medicine, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://periop.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Meirte, Jill
Hellemans, Nick
Anthonissen, Mieke
Denteneer, Lenie
Maertens, Koen
Moortgat, Peter
Van Daele, Ulrike
Benefits and Disadvantages of Electronic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Systematic Review
title Benefits and Disadvantages of Electronic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Systematic Review
title_full Benefits and Disadvantages of Electronic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Systematic Review
title_fullStr Benefits and Disadvantages of Electronic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Benefits and Disadvantages of Electronic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Systematic Review
title_short Benefits and Disadvantages of Electronic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Systematic Review
title_sort benefits and disadvantages of electronic patient-reported outcome measures: systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33393920
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15588
work_keys_str_mv AT meirtejill benefitsanddisadvantagesofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuressystematicreview
AT hellemansnick benefitsanddisadvantagesofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuressystematicreview
AT anthonissenmieke benefitsanddisadvantagesofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuressystematicreview
AT denteneerlenie benefitsanddisadvantagesofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuressystematicreview
AT maertenskoen benefitsanddisadvantagesofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuressystematicreview
AT moortgatpeter benefitsanddisadvantagesofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuressystematicreview
AT vandaeleulrike benefitsanddisadvantagesofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuressystematicreview