Cargando…
Development of the Attributional Style of Doctor Questionnaire
BACKGROUND: The attributional style of clinical workers will affect their emotion and behavior and affect how they deal with the relationship with patients. Current tools lack clinical events and are not suitable for measuring the attributional style of doctor. In this study, the development of the...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33281460 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S267141 |
_version_ | 1783617839508226048 |
---|---|
author | Tian, Hemei Wang, Pei |
author_facet | Tian, Hemei Wang, Pei |
author_sort | Tian, Hemei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The attributional style of clinical workers will affect their emotion and behavior and affect how they deal with the relationship with patients. Current tools lack clinical events and are not suitable for measuring the attributional style of doctor. In this study, the development of the Doctor’s Attributional Style Questionnaire (DASQ) is presented. METHODS: In study 1, based on the previous literature and the open-ended questionnaire, the theoretical structure of DASQ was constructed. In study 2, items analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were conducted in the sample (n=559) to select the best items for the DASQ. In study 3, the internal structure of the DASQ was tested in the sample (n=740) via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and 218 doctors were retested four weeks later. RESULTS: There are 24 items in the scale, including positive events questionnaire and negative events questionnaire, all of which are composed of four dimensions: controllability, globality, stability, and internality. The fitting degree of each questionnaire model is good, and all indexes are above 0.9. The internal consistency coefficient and retest coefficient of both the positive events questionnaire and the negative events questionnaire were above 0.75. CONCLUSION: The DASQ meets the requirements of measurement and can be used to measure the attributional style of doctors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7709868 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77098682020-12-03 Development of the Attributional Style of Doctor Questionnaire Tian, Hemei Wang, Pei Psychol Res Behav Manag Original Research BACKGROUND: The attributional style of clinical workers will affect their emotion and behavior and affect how they deal with the relationship with patients. Current tools lack clinical events and are not suitable for measuring the attributional style of doctor. In this study, the development of the Doctor’s Attributional Style Questionnaire (DASQ) is presented. METHODS: In study 1, based on the previous literature and the open-ended questionnaire, the theoretical structure of DASQ was constructed. In study 2, items analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were conducted in the sample (n=559) to select the best items for the DASQ. In study 3, the internal structure of the DASQ was tested in the sample (n=740) via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and 218 doctors were retested four weeks later. RESULTS: There are 24 items in the scale, including positive events questionnaire and negative events questionnaire, all of which are composed of four dimensions: controllability, globality, stability, and internality. The fitting degree of each questionnaire model is good, and all indexes are above 0.9. The internal consistency coefficient and retest coefficient of both the positive events questionnaire and the negative events questionnaire were above 0.75. CONCLUSION: The DASQ meets the requirements of measurement and can be used to measure the attributional style of doctors. Dove 2020-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7709868/ /pubmed/33281460 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S267141 Text en © 2020 Tian and Wang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Tian, Hemei Wang, Pei Development of the Attributional Style of Doctor Questionnaire |
title | Development of the Attributional Style of Doctor Questionnaire |
title_full | Development of the Attributional Style of Doctor Questionnaire |
title_fullStr | Development of the Attributional Style of Doctor Questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of the Attributional Style of Doctor Questionnaire |
title_short | Development of the Attributional Style of Doctor Questionnaire |
title_sort | development of the attributional style of doctor questionnaire |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33281460 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S267141 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tianhemei developmentoftheattributionalstyleofdoctorquestionnaire AT wangpei developmentoftheattributionalstyleofdoctorquestionnaire |