Cargando…

Development of the Attributional Style of Doctor Questionnaire

BACKGROUND: The attributional style of clinical workers will affect their emotion and behavior and affect how they deal with the relationship with patients. Current tools lack clinical events and are not suitable for measuring the attributional style of doctor. In this study, the development of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tian, Hemei, Wang, Pei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33281460
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S267141
_version_ 1783617839508226048
author Tian, Hemei
Wang, Pei
author_facet Tian, Hemei
Wang, Pei
author_sort Tian, Hemei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The attributional style of clinical workers will affect their emotion and behavior and affect how they deal with the relationship with patients. Current tools lack clinical events and are not suitable for measuring the attributional style of doctor. In this study, the development of the Doctor’s Attributional Style Questionnaire (DASQ) is presented. METHODS: In study 1, based on the previous literature and the open-ended questionnaire, the theoretical structure of DASQ was constructed. In study 2, items analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were conducted in the sample (n=559) to select the best items for the DASQ. In study 3, the internal structure of the DASQ was tested in the sample (n=740) via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and 218 doctors were retested four weeks later. RESULTS: There are 24 items in the scale, including positive events questionnaire and negative events questionnaire, all of which are composed of four dimensions: controllability, globality, stability, and internality. The fitting degree of each questionnaire model is good, and all indexes are above 0.9. The internal consistency coefficient and retest coefficient of both the positive events questionnaire and the negative events questionnaire were above 0.75. CONCLUSION: The DASQ meets the requirements of measurement and can be used to measure the attributional style of doctors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7709868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77098682020-12-03 Development of the Attributional Style of Doctor Questionnaire Tian, Hemei Wang, Pei Psychol Res Behav Manag Original Research BACKGROUND: The attributional style of clinical workers will affect their emotion and behavior and affect how they deal with the relationship with patients. Current tools lack clinical events and are not suitable for measuring the attributional style of doctor. In this study, the development of the Doctor’s Attributional Style Questionnaire (DASQ) is presented. METHODS: In study 1, based on the previous literature and the open-ended questionnaire, the theoretical structure of DASQ was constructed. In study 2, items analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were conducted in the sample (n=559) to select the best items for the DASQ. In study 3, the internal structure of the DASQ was tested in the sample (n=740) via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and 218 doctors were retested four weeks later. RESULTS: There are 24 items in the scale, including positive events questionnaire and negative events questionnaire, all of which are composed of four dimensions: controllability, globality, stability, and internality. The fitting degree of each questionnaire model is good, and all indexes are above 0.9. The internal consistency coefficient and retest coefficient of both the positive events questionnaire and the negative events questionnaire were above 0.75. CONCLUSION: The DASQ meets the requirements of measurement and can be used to measure the attributional style of doctors. Dove 2020-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7709868/ /pubmed/33281460 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S267141 Text en © 2020 Tian and Wang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Tian, Hemei
Wang, Pei
Development of the Attributional Style of Doctor Questionnaire
title Development of the Attributional Style of Doctor Questionnaire
title_full Development of the Attributional Style of Doctor Questionnaire
title_fullStr Development of the Attributional Style of Doctor Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Development of the Attributional Style of Doctor Questionnaire
title_short Development of the Attributional Style of Doctor Questionnaire
title_sort development of the attributional style of doctor questionnaire
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33281460
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S267141
work_keys_str_mv AT tianhemei developmentoftheattributionalstyleofdoctorquestionnaire
AT wangpei developmentoftheattributionalstyleofdoctorquestionnaire