Cargando…
A valuable MRI examination method for prostate cancer screening
To investigate the value of the 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score in prostate cancer (PCa) screening. Forty PCa patients diagnosed by pathology from December 2014 to September 2018 were recrui...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7710172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33235074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023134 |
_version_ | 1783617891053076480 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Xuezhen Shan, Lianqiang Cao, Haiming Jiang, Xu Ma, Xueping |
author_facet | Yang, Xuezhen Shan, Lianqiang Cao, Haiming Jiang, Xu Ma, Xueping |
author_sort | Yang, Xuezhen |
collection | PubMed |
description | To investigate the value of the 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score in prostate cancer (PCa) screening. Forty PCa patients diagnosed by pathology from December 2014 to September 2018 were recruited as the PCa group; 60 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were recruited as the benign group. Patients from both groups underwent 1.5T MRI scanning. The prostate ADC values, exponential apparent diffusion coefficient (eADC) values, and PI-RADS scores of patients from the 2 groups were compared. The different methods for PCa diagnosis were compared. The ADC values of patients in the PCa group were significantly lower than those in the benign group, whereas the eADC values of patients were significantly higher than those in the benign group, with statistically significant differences (P < .05). The differences in the PI-RADS scores of patients from the 2 groups were statistically significant (P < .05). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve results showed that the ADC value combined with the PI-RADS score was superior to the ADC value or the PI-RADS score alone in sensitivity, specificity, and Youden index for PCa diagnosis. By comparing the area under the curve (AUC) of each ROC curve from the different diagnostic methods, the combination of ADC value and PI-RADS score showed the largest area. The ADC value from 1.5T MRI combined with the PI-RADS score could be used as the standard for PCa screening, which would effectively improve screening for PCa and be valuable for clinical applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7710172 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77101722020-12-03 A valuable MRI examination method for prostate cancer screening Yang, Xuezhen Shan, Lianqiang Cao, Haiming Jiang, Xu Ma, Xueping Medicine (Baltimore) 6800 To investigate the value of the 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score in prostate cancer (PCa) screening. Forty PCa patients diagnosed by pathology from December 2014 to September 2018 were recruited as the PCa group; 60 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were recruited as the benign group. Patients from both groups underwent 1.5T MRI scanning. The prostate ADC values, exponential apparent diffusion coefficient (eADC) values, and PI-RADS scores of patients from the 2 groups were compared. The different methods for PCa diagnosis were compared. The ADC values of patients in the PCa group were significantly lower than those in the benign group, whereas the eADC values of patients were significantly higher than those in the benign group, with statistically significant differences (P < .05). The differences in the PI-RADS scores of patients from the 2 groups were statistically significant (P < .05). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve results showed that the ADC value combined with the PI-RADS score was superior to the ADC value or the PI-RADS score alone in sensitivity, specificity, and Youden index for PCa diagnosis. By comparing the area under the curve (AUC) of each ROC curve from the different diagnostic methods, the combination of ADC value and PI-RADS score showed the largest area. The ADC value from 1.5T MRI combined with the PI-RADS score could be used as the standard for PCa screening, which would effectively improve screening for PCa and be valuable for clinical applications. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7710172/ /pubmed/33235074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023134 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 6800 Yang, Xuezhen Shan, Lianqiang Cao, Haiming Jiang, Xu Ma, Xueping A valuable MRI examination method for prostate cancer screening |
title | A valuable MRI examination method for prostate cancer screening |
title_full | A valuable MRI examination method for prostate cancer screening |
title_fullStr | A valuable MRI examination method for prostate cancer screening |
title_full_unstemmed | A valuable MRI examination method for prostate cancer screening |
title_short | A valuable MRI examination method for prostate cancer screening |
title_sort | valuable mri examination method for prostate cancer screening |
topic | 6800 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7710172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33235074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023134 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangxuezhen avaluablemriexaminationmethodforprostatecancerscreening AT shanlianqiang avaluablemriexaminationmethodforprostatecancerscreening AT caohaiming avaluablemriexaminationmethodforprostatecancerscreening AT jiangxu avaluablemriexaminationmethodforprostatecancerscreening AT maxueping avaluablemriexaminationmethodforprostatecancerscreening AT yangxuezhen valuablemriexaminationmethodforprostatecancerscreening AT shanlianqiang valuablemriexaminationmethodforprostatecancerscreening AT caohaiming valuablemriexaminationmethodforprostatecancerscreening AT jiangxu valuablemriexaminationmethodforprostatecancerscreening AT maxueping valuablemriexaminationmethodforprostatecancerscreening |