Cargando…

Digital PCR for BCR-ABL1 Quantification in CML: Current Applications in Clinical Practice

Molecular monitoring of the BCR-ABL1 transcript for patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has become increasingly demanding. Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) is the routinely used method, but has limitations in quantification accuracy due to its inherent technical variation. Tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kockerols, Camille C.B., Valk, Peter J.M., Levin, Mark-David, Pallisgaard, Niels, Cornelissen, Jan J., Westerweel, Peter E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7710259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33283168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000496
_version_ 1783617911678566400
author Kockerols, Camille C.B.
Valk, Peter J.M.
Levin, Mark-David
Pallisgaard, Niels
Cornelissen, Jan J.
Westerweel, Peter E.
author_facet Kockerols, Camille C.B.
Valk, Peter J.M.
Levin, Mark-David
Pallisgaard, Niels
Cornelissen, Jan J.
Westerweel, Peter E.
author_sort Kockerols, Camille C.B.
collection PubMed
description Molecular monitoring of the BCR-ABL1 transcript for patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has become increasingly demanding. Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) is the routinely used method, but has limitations in quantification accuracy due to its inherent technical variation. Treatment recommendations rely on specific BCR-ABL1 values set at timed response milestones, making precise measurement of BCR-ABL1 a requisite. Furthermore, the sensitivity of qPCR may be insufficient to reliably quantify low levels of residual BCR-ABL1 in patients in deep molecular response (DMR) who could qualify for an attempt to discontinue Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) therapy. We reviewed the current use of digital PCR (dPCR) as a promising alternative for response monitoring in CML. dPCR offers an absolute BCR-ABL1 quantification at various disease levels with remarkable precision and a clinical sensitivity reaching down to at least MR5.0. Moreover, dPCR has been validated in multiple studies as prognostic marker for successful TKI treatment discontinuation, while this could not be achieved using classical qPCR. dPCR may thus prospectively be the preferred method to reliably identify patients achieving treatment milestones after initiation of TKI therapy as well as for the selection and timing for TKI discontinuation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7710259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77102592020-12-03 Digital PCR for BCR-ABL1 Quantification in CML: Current Applications in Clinical Practice Kockerols, Camille C.B. Valk, Peter J.M. Levin, Mark-David Pallisgaard, Niels Cornelissen, Jan J. Westerweel, Peter E. Hemasphere Review Article Molecular monitoring of the BCR-ABL1 transcript for patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has become increasingly demanding. Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) is the routinely used method, but has limitations in quantification accuracy due to its inherent technical variation. Treatment recommendations rely on specific BCR-ABL1 values set at timed response milestones, making precise measurement of BCR-ABL1 a requisite. Furthermore, the sensitivity of qPCR may be insufficient to reliably quantify low levels of residual BCR-ABL1 in patients in deep molecular response (DMR) who could qualify for an attempt to discontinue Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) therapy. We reviewed the current use of digital PCR (dPCR) as a promising alternative for response monitoring in CML. dPCR offers an absolute BCR-ABL1 quantification at various disease levels with remarkable precision and a clinical sensitivity reaching down to at least MR5.0. Moreover, dPCR has been validated in multiple studies as prognostic marker for successful TKI treatment discontinuation, while this could not be achieved using classical qPCR. dPCR may thus prospectively be the preferred method to reliably identify patients achieving treatment milestones after initiation of TKI therapy as well as for the selection and timing for TKI discontinuation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7710259/ /pubmed/33283168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000496 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Hematology Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives License 4.0, which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Review Article
Kockerols, Camille C.B.
Valk, Peter J.M.
Levin, Mark-David
Pallisgaard, Niels
Cornelissen, Jan J.
Westerweel, Peter E.
Digital PCR for BCR-ABL1 Quantification in CML: Current Applications in Clinical Practice
title Digital PCR for BCR-ABL1 Quantification in CML: Current Applications in Clinical Practice
title_full Digital PCR for BCR-ABL1 Quantification in CML: Current Applications in Clinical Practice
title_fullStr Digital PCR for BCR-ABL1 Quantification in CML: Current Applications in Clinical Practice
title_full_unstemmed Digital PCR for BCR-ABL1 Quantification in CML: Current Applications in Clinical Practice
title_short Digital PCR for BCR-ABL1 Quantification in CML: Current Applications in Clinical Practice
title_sort digital pcr for bcr-abl1 quantification in cml: current applications in clinical practice
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7710259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33283168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000496
work_keys_str_mv AT kockerolscamillecb digitalpcrforbcrabl1quantificationincmlcurrentapplicationsinclinicalpractice
AT valkpeterjm digitalpcrforbcrabl1quantificationincmlcurrentapplicationsinclinicalpractice
AT levinmarkdavid digitalpcrforbcrabl1quantificationincmlcurrentapplicationsinclinicalpractice
AT pallisgaardniels digitalpcrforbcrabl1quantificationincmlcurrentapplicationsinclinicalpractice
AT cornelissenjanj digitalpcrforbcrabl1quantificationincmlcurrentapplicationsinclinicalpractice
AT westerweelpetere digitalpcrforbcrabl1quantificationincmlcurrentapplicationsinclinicalpractice