Cargando…
Heterogeneity in individual preferences for HIV testing: A systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments
BACKGROUND: Understanding variations in HIV testing preferences can help inform optimal combinations of testing services to maximize coverage. We conducted a systematic review of Discrete Choice Experiments (DCEs) eliciting HIV testing preference. METHODS: We searched the published literature for pa...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7710637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33305199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100653 |
_version_ | 1783617976599052288 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, Monisha Ong, Jason J. Celum, Connie Terris-Prestholt, Fern |
author_facet | Sharma, Monisha Ong, Jason J. Celum, Connie Terris-Prestholt, Fern |
author_sort | Sharma, Monisha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Understanding variations in HIV testing preferences can help inform optimal combinations of testing services to maximize coverage. We conducted a systematic review of Discrete Choice Experiments (DCEs) eliciting HIV testing preference. METHODS: We searched the published literature for papers that conducted DCEs to assess user preferences for HIV testing. FINDINGS: We identified 237 publications; 14 studies conducted in 10 countries met inclusion criteria. Overall, test cost was one of the strongest drivers of preference, with participants preferring free or very low-cost testing. Confidentiality was a salient concern, particularly among key populations and persons who never tested. Participants in resource-limited settings preferred short travel distance and integration of HIV testing with other services. There was substantial heterogeneity across participant characteristics. For example, while women preferred home testing, high-risk groups (e.g. male porters, female bar workers) and men who had not tested in the last year preferred traveling a short distance for testing. HIV self-testing (HIVST) had high acceptability, particularly among those who had never HIV tested, although most users preferred blood-based sample collection over oral swabs. Participants highly valued post-test counselling availability after HIVST. INTERPRETATION: Overall, participants value low-cost, confidential testing with short travel distance. HIVST is a promising strategy to increase testing coverage but post-test counseling and support should be made available. Educational campaigns to increase familiarity and build confidence in results of oral testing can improve the success of HIVST. DCEs conducted within clinic settings likely have limited generalizability to those not seeking care, particularly for key populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7710637 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77106372020-12-09 Heterogeneity in individual preferences for HIV testing: A systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments Sharma, Monisha Ong, Jason J. Celum, Connie Terris-Prestholt, Fern EClinicalMedicine Research paper BACKGROUND: Understanding variations in HIV testing preferences can help inform optimal combinations of testing services to maximize coverage. We conducted a systematic review of Discrete Choice Experiments (DCEs) eliciting HIV testing preference. METHODS: We searched the published literature for papers that conducted DCEs to assess user preferences for HIV testing. FINDINGS: We identified 237 publications; 14 studies conducted in 10 countries met inclusion criteria. Overall, test cost was one of the strongest drivers of preference, with participants preferring free or very low-cost testing. Confidentiality was a salient concern, particularly among key populations and persons who never tested. Participants in resource-limited settings preferred short travel distance and integration of HIV testing with other services. There was substantial heterogeneity across participant characteristics. For example, while women preferred home testing, high-risk groups (e.g. male porters, female bar workers) and men who had not tested in the last year preferred traveling a short distance for testing. HIV self-testing (HIVST) had high acceptability, particularly among those who had never HIV tested, although most users preferred blood-based sample collection over oral swabs. Participants highly valued post-test counselling availability after HIVST. INTERPRETATION: Overall, participants value low-cost, confidential testing with short travel distance. HIVST is a promising strategy to increase testing coverage but post-test counseling and support should be made available. Educational campaigns to increase familiarity and build confidence in results of oral testing can improve the success of HIVST. DCEs conducted within clinic settings likely have limited generalizability to those not seeking care, particularly for key populations. Elsevier 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7710637/ /pubmed/33305199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100653 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research paper Sharma, Monisha Ong, Jason J. Celum, Connie Terris-Prestholt, Fern Heterogeneity in individual preferences for HIV testing: A systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments |
title | Heterogeneity in individual preferences for HIV testing: A systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments |
title_full | Heterogeneity in individual preferences for HIV testing: A systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments |
title_fullStr | Heterogeneity in individual preferences for HIV testing: A systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments |
title_full_unstemmed | Heterogeneity in individual preferences for HIV testing: A systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments |
title_short | Heterogeneity in individual preferences for HIV testing: A systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments |
title_sort | heterogeneity in individual preferences for hiv testing: a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments |
topic | Research paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7710637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33305199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100653 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmamonisha heterogeneityinindividualpreferencesforhivtestingasystematicliteraturereviewofdiscretechoiceexperiments AT ongjasonj heterogeneityinindividualpreferencesforhivtestingasystematicliteraturereviewofdiscretechoiceexperiments AT celumconnie heterogeneityinindividualpreferencesforhivtestingasystematicliteraturereviewofdiscretechoiceexperiments AT terrisprestholtfern heterogeneityinindividualpreferencesforhivtestingasystematicliteraturereviewofdiscretechoiceexperiments |