Cargando…
Robotic Rehabilitation: An Opportunity to Improve Cognitive Functions in Subjects With Stroke. An Explorative Study
Background: After a stroke, up to three-quarters of acute and subacute stroke survivors exhibit cognitive impairment, with a significant impact on functional recovery, quality of life, and social engagement. Robotic therapy has shown its effectiveness on motor recovery, but its effectiveness on cogn...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7710798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329334 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.588285 |
_version_ | 1783618009207668736 |
---|---|
author | Aprile, Irene Guardati, Giulia Cipollini, Valeria Papadopoulou, Dionysia Mastrorosa, Alessia Castelli, Letizia Monteleone, Serena Redolfi, Alessandra Galeri, Silvia Germanotta, Marco |
author_facet | Aprile, Irene Guardati, Giulia Cipollini, Valeria Papadopoulou, Dionysia Mastrorosa, Alessia Castelli, Letizia Monteleone, Serena Redolfi, Alessandra Galeri, Silvia Germanotta, Marco |
author_sort | Aprile, Irene |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: After a stroke, up to three-quarters of acute and subacute stroke survivors exhibit cognitive impairment, with a significant impact on functional recovery, quality of life, and social engagement. Robotic therapy has shown its effectiveness on motor recovery, but its effectiveness on cognitive recovery has not fully investigated. Objective: This study aims to assess the impact of a technological rehabilitation intervention on cognitive functions in patients with stroke, using a set of three robots and one sensor-based device for upper limb rehabilitation. Methods: This is a pilot study in which 51 patients were enrolled. An upper limb rehabilitation program was performed using three robots and one sensor-based device. The intervention comprised motor/cognitive exercises, especially selected among the available ones to train also cognitive functions. Patients underwent 30 rehabilitation sessions, each session lasting 45 minutes, 5 days a week. Patients were assessed before and after the treatment with several cognitive tests (Oxford Cognitive Scale, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, Digit Span, Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure, Tower of London, and Stroop test). In addition, motor (Fugl–Meyer Assessment and Motricity Index) and disability (modified Barthel Index) scales were used. Results: According to the Oxford Cognitive Scale domains, a significant percentage of patients exhibited cognitive deficits. Excluding perception (with only one patient impaired), the domain with the lowest percentage of patients showing a pathological score was praxis (about 25%), while the highest percentage of impaired patients was found in calculation (about 70%). After the treatment, patients improved in all the investigated cognitive domains, as measured by the selected cognitive assessment scales. Moreover, motor and disability scales confirmed the efficacy of robotics on upper limb rehabilitation in patients with stroke. Conclusions: This explorative study suggests that robotic technology can be used to combine motor and cognitive exercises in a unique treatment session. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04164381. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7710798 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77107982020-12-15 Robotic Rehabilitation: An Opportunity to Improve Cognitive Functions in Subjects With Stroke. An Explorative Study Aprile, Irene Guardati, Giulia Cipollini, Valeria Papadopoulou, Dionysia Mastrorosa, Alessia Castelli, Letizia Monteleone, Serena Redolfi, Alessandra Galeri, Silvia Germanotta, Marco Front Neurol Neurology Background: After a stroke, up to three-quarters of acute and subacute stroke survivors exhibit cognitive impairment, with a significant impact on functional recovery, quality of life, and social engagement. Robotic therapy has shown its effectiveness on motor recovery, but its effectiveness on cognitive recovery has not fully investigated. Objective: This study aims to assess the impact of a technological rehabilitation intervention on cognitive functions in patients with stroke, using a set of three robots and one sensor-based device for upper limb rehabilitation. Methods: This is a pilot study in which 51 patients were enrolled. An upper limb rehabilitation program was performed using three robots and one sensor-based device. The intervention comprised motor/cognitive exercises, especially selected among the available ones to train also cognitive functions. Patients underwent 30 rehabilitation sessions, each session lasting 45 minutes, 5 days a week. Patients were assessed before and after the treatment with several cognitive tests (Oxford Cognitive Scale, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, Digit Span, Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure, Tower of London, and Stroop test). In addition, motor (Fugl–Meyer Assessment and Motricity Index) and disability (modified Barthel Index) scales were used. Results: According to the Oxford Cognitive Scale domains, a significant percentage of patients exhibited cognitive deficits. Excluding perception (with only one patient impaired), the domain with the lowest percentage of patients showing a pathological score was praxis (about 25%), while the highest percentage of impaired patients was found in calculation (about 70%). After the treatment, patients improved in all the investigated cognitive domains, as measured by the selected cognitive assessment scales. Moreover, motor and disability scales confirmed the efficacy of robotics on upper limb rehabilitation in patients with stroke. Conclusions: This explorative study suggests that robotic technology can be used to combine motor and cognitive exercises in a unique treatment session. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04164381. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7710798/ /pubmed/33329334 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.588285 Text en Copyright © 2020 Aprile, Guardati, Cipollini, Papadopoulou, Mastrorosa, Castelli, Monteleone, Redolfi, Galeri and Germanotta. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Aprile, Irene Guardati, Giulia Cipollini, Valeria Papadopoulou, Dionysia Mastrorosa, Alessia Castelli, Letizia Monteleone, Serena Redolfi, Alessandra Galeri, Silvia Germanotta, Marco Robotic Rehabilitation: An Opportunity to Improve Cognitive Functions in Subjects With Stroke. An Explorative Study |
title | Robotic Rehabilitation: An Opportunity to Improve Cognitive Functions in Subjects With Stroke. An Explorative Study |
title_full | Robotic Rehabilitation: An Opportunity to Improve Cognitive Functions in Subjects With Stroke. An Explorative Study |
title_fullStr | Robotic Rehabilitation: An Opportunity to Improve Cognitive Functions in Subjects With Stroke. An Explorative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic Rehabilitation: An Opportunity to Improve Cognitive Functions in Subjects With Stroke. An Explorative Study |
title_short | Robotic Rehabilitation: An Opportunity to Improve Cognitive Functions in Subjects With Stroke. An Explorative Study |
title_sort | robotic rehabilitation: an opportunity to improve cognitive functions in subjects with stroke. an explorative study |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7710798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329334 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.588285 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aprileirene roboticrehabilitationanopportunitytoimprovecognitivefunctionsinsubjectswithstrokeanexplorativestudy AT guardatigiulia roboticrehabilitationanopportunitytoimprovecognitivefunctionsinsubjectswithstrokeanexplorativestudy AT cipollinivaleria roboticrehabilitationanopportunitytoimprovecognitivefunctionsinsubjectswithstrokeanexplorativestudy AT papadopouloudionysia roboticrehabilitationanopportunitytoimprovecognitivefunctionsinsubjectswithstrokeanexplorativestudy AT mastrorosaalessia roboticrehabilitationanopportunitytoimprovecognitivefunctionsinsubjectswithstrokeanexplorativestudy AT castelliletizia roboticrehabilitationanopportunitytoimprovecognitivefunctionsinsubjectswithstrokeanexplorativestudy AT monteleoneserena roboticrehabilitationanopportunitytoimprovecognitivefunctionsinsubjectswithstrokeanexplorativestudy AT redolfialessandra roboticrehabilitationanopportunitytoimprovecognitivefunctionsinsubjectswithstrokeanexplorativestudy AT galerisilvia roboticrehabilitationanopportunitytoimprovecognitivefunctionsinsubjectswithstrokeanexplorativestudy AT germanottamarco roboticrehabilitationanopportunitytoimprovecognitivefunctionsinsubjectswithstrokeanexplorativestudy |