Cargando…

Moral Decision-Making, Stress, and Social Cognition in Frontline Workers vs. Population Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explorative Study

On March 9, 2020, Italy has gone into “lockdown” because of COVID-19 pandemic, with a national quarantine. All non-essential working activities and schools of all levels have been temporarily closed: consequently, the entire population have been forced to dramatically change their daily habits. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mazza, Monica, Attanasio, Margherita, Pino, Maria Chiara, Masedu, Francesco, Tiberti, Sergio, Sarlo, Michela, Valenti, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7710972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329249
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588159
_version_ 1783618045345792000
author Mazza, Monica
Attanasio, Margherita
Pino, Maria Chiara
Masedu, Francesco
Tiberti, Sergio
Sarlo, Michela
Valenti, Marco
author_facet Mazza, Monica
Attanasio, Margherita
Pino, Maria Chiara
Masedu, Francesco
Tiberti, Sergio
Sarlo, Michela
Valenti, Marco
author_sort Mazza, Monica
collection PubMed
description On March 9, 2020, Italy has gone into “lockdown” because of COVID-19 pandemic, with a national quarantine. All non-essential working activities and schools of all levels have been temporarily closed: consequently, the entire population have been forced to dramatically change their daily habits. The pandemic raised important psychological, moral, social, and economic issues. Our research focused on the moral decision-making of people during an emergency. This paper reports two studies. The aim of Study 1 was to evaluate moral decision-making, level of perceived stress, ability of mentalizing and empathy in university students and Italian workers. 224 front-line workers (FLW), 413 second-line workers (SLW), and 663 university students (US), during Italian Phase 1 of lockdown, completed an online questionnaire. The results of Study 1 showed that participants in the FLW group are more likely to choose utilitarian solutions and judge as morally acceptable actions finalized to saving lives of more people if this requires sacrificing a low number of individuals. At the same time, decision-making was experienced as less unpleasant and less arousing with respect to the other two groups, demonstrating a greater ability to keep emotional control under pressure. In Study 2, we compared the same variables used in Study 1, selecting two professional categories from the FLW group engaged in emergency during COVID-19, namely healthcare providers (n = 82) and public safety personnel (n = 117). Our results showed that healthcare providers were more stressed and emotionally involved than public safety personnel, with higher empathic concern and arousal in moral decision-making. We suggest it is essential providing immediate psychological support and monitoring physical and emotional well-being for workers in the front-line during emergencies like the COVID-19 pandemic, in order to prevent experiences of moral distress or mental health problems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7710972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77109722020-12-15 Moral Decision-Making, Stress, and Social Cognition in Frontline Workers vs. Population Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explorative Study Mazza, Monica Attanasio, Margherita Pino, Maria Chiara Masedu, Francesco Tiberti, Sergio Sarlo, Michela Valenti, Marco Front Psychol Psychology On March 9, 2020, Italy has gone into “lockdown” because of COVID-19 pandemic, with a national quarantine. All non-essential working activities and schools of all levels have been temporarily closed: consequently, the entire population have been forced to dramatically change their daily habits. The pandemic raised important psychological, moral, social, and economic issues. Our research focused on the moral decision-making of people during an emergency. This paper reports two studies. The aim of Study 1 was to evaluate moral decision-making, level of perceived stress, ability of mentalizing and empathy in university students and Italian workers. 224 front-line workers (FLW), 413 second-line workers (SLW), and 663 university students (US), during Italian Phase 1 of lockdown, completed an online questionnaire. The results of Study 1 showed that participants in the FLW group are more likely to choose utilitarian solutions and judge as morally acceptable actions finalized to saving lives of more people if this requires sacrificing a low number of individuals. At the same time, decision-making was experienced as less unpleasant and less arousing with respect to the other two groups, demonstrating a greater ability to keep emotional control under pressure. In Study 2, we compared the same variables used in Study 1, selecting two professional categories from the FLW group engaged in emergency during COVID-19, namely healthcare providers (n = 82) and public safety personnel (n = 117). Our results showed that healthcare providers were more stressed and emotionally involved than public safety personnel, with higher empathic concern and arousal in moral decision-making. We suggest it is essential providing immediate psychological support and monitoring physical and emotional well-being for workers in the front-line during emergencies like the COVID-19 pandemic, in order to prevent experiences of moral distress or mental health problems. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7710972/ /pubmed/33329249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588159 Text en Copyright © 2020 Mazza, Attanasio, Pino, Masedu, Tiberti, Sarlo and Valenti. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Mazza, Monica
Attanasio, Margherita
Pino, Maria Chiara
Masedu, Francesco
Tiberti, Sergio
Sarlo, Michela
Valenti, Marco
Moral Decision-Making, Stress, and Social Cognition in Frontline Workers vs. Population Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explorative Study
title Moral Decision-Making, Stress, and Social Cognition in Frontline Workers vs. Population Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explorative Study
title_full Moral Decision-Making, Stress, and Social Cognition in Frontline Workers vs. Population Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explorative Study
title_fullStr Moral Decision-Making, Stress, and Social Cognition in Frontline Workers vs. Population Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explorative Study
title_full_unstemmed Moral Decision-Making, Stress, and Social Cognition in Frontline Workers vs. Population Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explorative Study
title_short Moral Decision-Making, Stress, and Social Cognition in Frontline Workers vs. Population Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explorative Study
title_sort moral decision-making, stress, and social cognition in frontline workers vs. population groups during the covid-19 pandemic: an explorative study
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7710972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329249
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588159
work_keys_str_mv AT mazzamonica moraldecisionmakingstressandsocialcognitioninfrontlineworkersvspopulationgroupsduringthecovid19pandemicanexplorativestudy
AT attanasiomargherita moraldecisionmakingstressandsocialcognitioninfrontlineworkersvspopulationgroupsduringthecovid19pandemicanexplorativestudy
AT pinomariachiara moraldecisionmakingstressandsocialcognitioninfrontlineworkersvspopulationgroupsduringthecovid19pandemicanexplorativestudy
AT masedufrancesco moraldecisionmakingstressandsocialcognitioninfrontlineworkersvspopulationgroupsduringthecovid19pandemicanexplorativestudy
AT tibertisergio moraldecisionmakingstressandsocialcognitioninfrontlineworkersvspopulationgroupsduringthecovid19pandemicanexplorativestudy
AT sarlomichela moraldecisionmakingstressandsocialcognitioninfrontlineworkersvspopulationgroupsduringthecovid19pandemicanexplorativestudy
AT valentimarco moraldecisionmakingstressandsocialcognitioninfrontlineworkersvspopulationgroupsduringthecovid19pandemicanexplorativestudy