Cargando…
Moral Decision-Making, Stress, and Social Cognition in Frontline Workers vs. Population Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explorative Study
On March 9, 2020, Italy has gone into “lockdown” because of COVID-19 pandemic, with a national quarantine. All non-essential working activities and schools of all levels have been temporarily closed: consequently, the entire population have been forced to dramatically change their daily habits. The...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7710972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588159 |
_version_ | 1783618045345792000 |
---|---|
author | Mazza, Monica Attanasio, Margherita Pino, Maria Chiara Masedu, Francesco Tiberti, Sergio Sarlo, Michela Valenti, Marco |
author_facet | Mazza, Monica Attanasio, Margherita Pino, Maria Chiara Masedu, Francesco Tiberti, Sergio Sarlo, Michela Valenti, Marco |
author_sort | Mazza, Monica |
collection | PubMed |
description | On March 9, 2020, Italy has gone into “lockdown” because of COVID-19 pandemic, with a national quarantine. All non-essential working activities and schools of all levels have been temporarily closed: consequently, the entire population have been forced to dramatically change their daily habits. The pandemic raised important psychological, moral, social, and economic issues. Our research focused on the moral decision-making of people during an emergency. This paper reports two studies. The aim of Study 1 was to evaluate moral decision-making, level of perceived stress, ability of mentalizing and empathy in university students and Italian workers. 224 front-line workers (FLW), 413 second-line workers (SLW), and 663 university students (US), during Italian Phase 1 of lockdown, completed an online questionnaire. The results of Study 1 showed that participants in the FLW group are more likely to choose utilitarian solutions and judge as morally acceptable actions finalized to saving lives of more people if this requires sacrificing a low number of individuals. At the same time, decision-making was experienced as less unpleasant and less arousing with respect to the other two groups, demonstrating a greater ability to keep emotional control under pressure. In Study 2, we compared the same variables used in Study 1, selecting two professional categories from the FLW group engaged in emergency during COVID-19, namely healthcare providers (n = 82) and public safety personnel (n = 117). Our results showed that healthcare providers were more stressed and emotionally involved than public safety personnel, with higher empathic concern and arousal in moral decision-making. We suggest it is essential providing immediate psychological support and monitoring physical and emotional well-being for workers in the front-line during emergencies like the COVID-19 pandemic, in order to prevent experiences of moral distress or mental health problems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7710972 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77109722020-12-15 Moral Decision-Making, Stress, and Social Cognition in Frontline Workers vs. Population Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explorative Study Mazza, Monica Attanasio, Margherita Pino, Maria Chiara Masedu, Francesco Tiberti, Sergio Sarlo, Michela Valenti, Marco Front Psychol Psychology On March 9, 2020, Italy has gone into “lockdown” because of COVID-19 pandemic, with a national quarantine. All non-essential working activities and schools of all levels have been temporarily closed: consequently, the entire population have been forced to dramatically change their daily habits. The pandemic raised important psychological, moral, social, and economic issues. Our research focused on the moral decision-making of people during an emergency. This paper reports two studies. The aim of Study 1 was to evaluate moral decision-making, level of perceived stress, ability of mentalizing and empathy in university students and Italian workers. 224 front-line workers (FLW), 413 second-line workers (SLW), and 663 university students (US), during Italian Phase 1 of lockdown, completed an online questionnaire. The results of Study 1 showed that participants in the FLW group are more likely to choose utilitarian solutions and judge as morally acceptable actions finalized to saving lives of more people if this requires sacrificing a low number of individuals. At the same time, decision-making was experienced as less unpleasant and less arousing with respect to the other two groups, demonstrating a greater ability to keep emotional control under pressure. In Study 2, we compared the same variables used in Study 1, selecting two professional categories from the FLW group engaged in emergency during COVID-19, namely healthcare providers (n = 82) and public safety personnel (n = 117). Our results showed that healthcare providers were more stressed and emotionally involved than public safety personnel, with higher empathic concern and arousal in moral decision-making. We suggest it is essential providing immediate psychological support and monitoring physical and emotional well-being for workers in the front-line during emergencies like the COVID-19 pandemic, in order to prevent experiences of moral distress or mental health problems. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7710972/ /pubmed/33329249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588159 Text en Copyright © 2020 Mazza, Attanasio, Pino, Masedu, Tiberti, Sarlo and Valenti. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Mazza, Monica Attanasio, Margherita Pino, Maria Chiara Masedu, Francesco Tiberti, Sergio Sarlo, Michela Valenti, Marco Moral Decision-Making, Stress, and Social Cognition in Frontline Workers vs. Population Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explorative Study |
title | Moral Decision-Making, Stress, and Social Cognition in Frontline Workers vs. Population Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explorative Study |
title_full | Moral Decision-Making, Stress, and Social Cognition in Frontline Workers vs. Population Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explorative Study |
title_fullStr | Moral Decision-Making, Stress, and Social Cognition in Frontline Workers vs. Population Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explorative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Moral Decision-Making, Stress, and Social Cognition in Frontline Workers vs. Population Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explorative Study |
title_short | Moral Decision-Making, Stress, and Social Cognition in Frontline Workers vs. Population Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explorative Study |
title_sort | moral decision-making, stress, and social cognition in frontline workers vs. population groups during the covid-19 pandemic: an explorative study |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7710972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588159 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mazzamonica moraldecisionmakingstressandsocialcognitioninfrontlineworkersvspopulationgroupsduringthecovid19pandemicanexplorativestudy AT attanasiomargherita moraldecisionmakingstressandsocialcognitioninfrontlineworkersvspopulationgroupsduringthecovid19pandemicanexplorativestudy AT pinomariachiara moraldecisionmakingstressandsocialcognitioninfrontlineworkersvspopulationgroupsduringthecovid19pandemicanexplorativestudy AT masedufrancesco moraldecisionmakingstressandsocialcognitioninfrontlineworkersvspopulationgroupsduringthecovid19pandemicanexplorativestudy AT tibertisergio moraldecisionmakingstressandsocialcognitioninfrontlineworkersvspopulationgroupsduringthecovid19pandemicanexplorativestudy AT sarlomichela moraldecisionmakingstressandsocialcognitioninfrontlineworkersvspopulationgroupsduringthecovid19pandemicanexplorativestudy AT valentimarco moraldecisionmakingstressandsocialcognitioninfrontlineworkersvspopulationgroupsduringthecovid19pandemicanexplorativestudy |