Cargando…
The impact of post-warming culture duration on clinical outcomes of vitrified-warmed single blastocyst transfer cycles
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the effects of long-term and short-term embryo culture to assess whether there is a correlation between culture duration and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Embryos were divided into two study groups depending on whether their post-warming culture per...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33181011 http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2020.03832 |
_version_ | 1783618073191776256 |
---|---|
author | Hwang, Ji Young Park, Jae Kyun Kim, Tae Hyung Eum, Jin Hee Song, Haengseok Kim, Jin Young Park, Han Moie Park, Chan Woo Lee, Woo Sik Lyu, Sang Woo |
author_facet | Hwang, Ji Young Park, Jae Kyun Kim, Tae Hyung Eum, Jin Hee Song, Haengseok Kim, Jin Young Park, Han Moie Park, Chan Woo Lee, Woo Sik Lyu, Sang Woo |
author_sort | Hwang, Ji Young |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the effects of long-term and short-term embryo culture to assess whether there is a correlation between culture duration and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Embryos were divided into two study groups depending on whether their post-warming culture period was long-term (20–24 hours) or short-term (2–4 hours). Embryo morphology was analyzed with a time-lapse monitoring device to estimate the appropriate timing and parameters for evaluating embryos with high implantation potency in both groups. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust the confounding factors across groups. The grades of embryos and blastocoels, morphokinetic parameters, implantation rate, and ongoing pregnancy rate were compared. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the implantation rate or ongoing pregnancy rate between the two groups (long-term culture group vs. short-term culture group: 56.3% vs. 67.9%, p=0.182; 47.3% vs. 53.6%, p=0.513). After warming, there were more expanded and hatching/hatched blastocysts in the long-term culture group than in the short-term culture group, but there was no significant between-group difference in embryo grade. Regarding pregnancy outcomes, the time to complete blastocyst re-expansion after warming is shorter in women who became pregnant than in those who did not in both culture groups (long-term: 2.19±0.63 vs. 4.11±0.81 hours, p=0.003; short-term: 1.17±0.29 vs. 1.94±0.76 hours, p=0.018, respectively). CONCLUSION: The outcomes of short-term culture and long-term culture were not significantly different in vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer. Regardless of the post-warming culture time, the degree of blastocyst re-expansion 3–4 hours after warming is an important marker for embryo selection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7711098 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77110982020-12-09 The impact of post-warming culture duration on clinical outcomes of vitrified-warmed single blastocyst transfer cycles Hwang, Ji Young Park, Jae Kyun Kim, Tae Hyung Eum, Jin Hee Song, Haengseok Kim, Jin Young Park, Han Moie Park, Chan Woo Lee, Woo Sik Lyu, Sang Woo Clin Exp Reprod Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the effects of long-term and short-term embryo culture to assess whether there is a correlation between culture duration and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Embryos were divided into two study groups depending on whether their post-warming culture period was long-term (20–24 hours) or short-term (2–4 hours). Embryo morphology was analyzed with a time-lapse monitoring device to estimate the appropriate timing and parameters for evaluating embryos with high implantation potency in both groups. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust the confounding factors across groups. The grades of embryos and blastocoels, morphokinetic parameters, implantation rate, and ongoing pregnancy rate were compared. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the implantation rate or ongoing pregnancy rate between the two groups (long-term culture group vs. short-term culture group: 56.3% vs. 67.9%, p=0.182; 47.3% vs. 53.6%, p=0.513). After warming, there were more expanded and hatching/hatched blastocysts in the long-term culture group than in the short-term culture group, but there was no significant between-group difference in embryo grade. Regarding pregnancy outcomes, the time to complete blastocyst re-expansion after warming is shorter in women who became pregnant than in those who did not in both culture groups (long-term: 2.19±0.63 vs. 4.11±0.81 hours, p=0.003; short-term: 1.17±0.29 vs. 1.94±0.76 hours, p=0.018, respectively). CONCLUSION: The outcomes of short-term culture and long-term culture were not significantly different in vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer. Regardless of the post-warming culture time, the degree of blastocyst re-expansion 3–4 hours after warming is an important marker for embryo selection. Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine 2020-12 2020-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7711098/ /pubmed/33181011 http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2020.03832 Text en Copyright © 2020. THE KOREAN SOCIETY FOR REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hwang, Ji Young Park, Jae Kyun Kim, Tae Hyung Eum, Jin Hee Song, Haengseok Kim, Jin Young Park, Han Moie Park, Chan Woo Lee, Woo Sik Lyu, Sang Woo The impact of post-warming culture duration on clinical outcomes of vitrified-warmed single blastocyst transfer cycles |
title | The impact of post-warming culture duration on clinical outcomes of vitrified-warmed single blastocyst transfer cycles |
title_full | The impact of post-warming culture duration on clinical outcomes of vitrified-warmed single blastocyst transfer cycles |
title_fullStr | The impact of post-warming culture duration on clinical outcomes of vitrified-warmed single blastocyst transfer cycles |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of post-warming culture duration on clinical outcomes of vitrified-warmed single blastocyst transfer cycles |
title_short | The impact of post-warming culture duration on clinical outcomes of vitrified-warmed single blastocyst transfer cycles |
title_sort | impact of post-warming culture duration on clinical outcomes of vitrified-warmed single blastocyst transfer cycles |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33181011 http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2020.03832 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hwangjiyoung theimpactofpostwarmingculturedurationonclinicaloutcomesofvitrifiedwarmedsingleblastocysttransfercycles AT parkjaekyun theimpactofpostwarmingculturedurationonclinicaloutcomesofvitrifiedwarmedsingleblastocysttransfercycles AT kimtaehyung theimpactofpostwarmingculturedurationonclinicaloutcomesofvitrifiedwarmedsingleblastocysttransfercycles AT eumjinhee theimpactofpostwarmingculturedurationonclinicaloutcomesofvitrifiedwarmedsingleblastocysttransfercycles AT songhaengseok theimpactofpostwarmingculturedurationonclinicaloutcomesofvitrifiedwarmedsingleblastocysttransfercycles AT kimjinyoung theimpactofpostwarmingculturedurationonclinicaloutcomesofvitrifiedwarmedsingleblastocysttransfercycles AT parkhanmoie theimpactofpostwarmingculturedurationonclinicaloutcomesofvitrifiedwarmedsingleblastocysttransfercycles AT parkchanwoo theimpactofpostwarmingculturedurationonclinicaloutcomesofvitrifiedwarmedsingleblastocysttransfercycles AT leewoosik theimpactofpostwarmingculturedurationonclinicaloutcomesofvitrifiedwarmedsingleblastocysttransfercycles AT lyusangwoo theimpactofpostwarmingculturedurationonclinicaloutcomesofvitrifiedwarmedsingleblastocysttransfercycles AT hwangjiyoung impactofpostwarmingculturedurationonclinicaloutcomesofvitrifiedwarmedsingleblastocysttransfercycles AT parkjaekyun impactofpostwarmingculturedurationonclinicaloutcomesofvitrifiedwarmedsingleblastocysttransfercycles AT kimtaehyung impactofpostwarmingculturedurationonclinicaloutcomesofvitrifiedwarmedsingleblastocysttransfercycles AT eumjinhee impactofpostwarmingculturedurationonclinicaloutcomesofvitrifiedwarmedsingleblastocysttransfercycles AT songhaengseok impactofpostwarmingculturedurationonclinicaloutcomesofvitrifiedwarmedsingleblastocysttransfercycles AT kimjinyoung impactofpostwarmingculturedurationonclinicaloutcomesofvitrifiedwarmedsingleblastocysttransfercycles AT parkhanmoie impactofpostwarmingculturedurationonclinicaloutcomesofvitrifiedwarmedsingleblastocysttransfercycles AT parkchanwoo impactofpostwarmingculturedurationonclinicaloutcomesofvitrifiedwarmedsingleblastocysttransfercycles AT leewoosik impactofpostwarmingculturedurationonclinicaloutcomesofvitrifiedwarmedsingleblastocysttransfercycles AT lyusangwoo impactofpostwarmingculturedurationonclinicaloutcomesofvitrifiedwarmedsingleblastocysttransfercycles |