Varied approaches to loading assessment in fatigue studies

In this paper, the authors want to draw readers’ attention to one long-standing question: which approach is preferable for estimation longevities in fatigue problem, the time domain approach (Rainflow) or the frequency domain one (Dirlik and others)? This question is important in engineering problems, particularly in problems of prolongation of the guaranteed service life. The discussion here is restricted by the longevity evaluation only at the post-processing stage of unidirectional loaded machine parts. It means the realizations might be recorded. Some experimental and speculative evidence of preferable use the Rainflow method is shown. Taking into account the huge computer's power nowadays, the question of the irrelevance of appellation to the calculation accelerating using the spectral methods is specially discussed. There are areas, where the spectral methods are really necessary. There is only a need to recommend the restriction of their application scope to these special situations. It seems there is no need in inventing new spectral complicated algorithms only to stress out at the end, that their result coincides with the Rainflow outcome. That might be confusing for the practicing engineers. Currently, the main attention among supporters of spectral methods is focused on non-stationary and non-Gaussian random processes. (to estimate the spectral density is impossible for non-stationary processes, according to definition). These researchers seem to have forgotten, that even for these complicated situations the decision has already existed: that is the Rainflow and its analogues. The paper shows extensive laboratory experiment results of random fatigue testing of aluminum flat specimens under regular (to build the fatigue curve) and irregular (random) loading. The fatigue life curve (Gassner curve) has been built. These results allowed to compare the existing computation methods of longevity estimation. In the particular situation of narrow-band process, the methods seem to provide comparative results. Considered are methodological issues related to the assessment of the necessary and sufficient realization length, the influence of RMS, cycle counting methods and some possibilities of computing resources saving when using the Rainflow method. The stability of the Rainflow estimates is confirmed. Some problems with the choice of parameters during the longevity assessment by the Dirlik method were noted.