Cargando…
Transcatheter aortic valve resection: new mechanical devices
BACKGROUND: To improve periprocedural outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), transcatheter mechanical resection devices were tested for prior ablation of the aortic cusps. METHODS: Three mechanical transcatheter resection devices were tested in a series of native porcine (n=30)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33282360 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-2036 |
_version_ | 1783618127218606080 |
---|---|
author | Dai, Huangdong Lutter, Georg Frank, Derk Freitag-Wolf, Sandra Topal, Ayça Haneya, Assad Sathananthan, Janarthanan Puehler, Thomas |
author_facet | Dai, Huangdong Lutter, Georg Frank, Derk Freitag-Wolf, Sandra Topal, Ayça Haneya, Assad Sathananthan, Janarthanan Puehler, Thomas |
author_sort | Dai, Huangdong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To improve periprocedural outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), transcatheter mechanical resection devices were tested for prior ablation of the aortic cusps. METHODS: Three mechanical transcatheter resection devices were tested in a series of native porcine (n=30) and reassembled calcified human valves (n=54). The resection time, the resected valve area, the number of released cusps, and the degree of surrounding tissue damage were measured. Afterwards, postmortem transapical-transcatheter-resections of the aortic valve in two humans were performed. RESULTS: In the native porcine hearts, the Aesculap II device demonstrated significantly shorter resection time compared to the R&R II and the Randstad devices (6.5±2.0 vs. 28.6±24.1 vs. 23.3±14.4 sec; P=0.001). However, it created more lesions in the surrounding tissue (P=0.002). The R&R II achieved a smaller number of resected cusps than the other two devices (2.7±0.7 vs. 1.1±0.7 vs. 2.4±0.5; P<0.001, respectively). It also resected a smaller area of the aortic valve (306.5±149.2 vs. 106.7±29.6 vs. 256.8±81.3 mm2; P=0.09) but a larger mean area of the resected fragments (110.3±41.5 vs. 160.7±29.6 vs. 111.5±43.9 mm2; P=0.01). The resection of the reassembled human valves demonstrated the same results between the devices regarding resection time (P=0.001) and resected area (P=0.016), but not fragment sizes (P=0.610). Finally, transapical-transcatheter-resection of aortic valve was performed in two cadavers. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter aortic valve resection is feasible with variable aortic leaflet resection times and mild risk of lesions of the surrounding tissue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7711357 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77113572020-12-03 Transcatheter aortic valve resection: new mechanical devices Dai, Huangdong Lutter, Georg Frank, Derk Freitag-Wolf, Sandra Topal, Ayça Haneya, Assad Sathananthan, Janarthanan Puehler, Thomas J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: To improve periprocedural outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), transcatheter mechanical resection devices were tested for prior ablation of the aortic cusps. METHODS: Three mechanical transcatheter resection devices were tested in a series of native porcine (n=30) and reassembled calcified human valves (n=54). The resection time, the resected valve area, the number of released cusps, and the degree of surrounding tissue damage were measured. Afterwards, postmortem transapical-transcatheter-resections of the aortic valve in two humans were performed. RESULTS: In the native porcine hearts, the Aesculap II device demonstrated significantly shorter resection time compared to the R&R II and the Randstad devices (6.5±2.0 vs. 28.6±24.1 vs. 23.3±14.4 sec; P=0.001). However, it created more lesions in the surrounding tissue (P=0.002). The R&R II achieved a smaller number of resected cusps than the other two devices (2.7±0.7 vs. 1.1±0.7 vs. 2.4±0.5; P<0.001, respectively). It also resected a smaller area of the aortic valve (306.5±149.2 vs. 106.7±29.6 vs. 256.8±81.3 mm2; P=0.09) but a larger mean area of the resected fragments (110.3±41.5 vs. 160.7±29.6 vs. 111.5±43.9 mm2; P=0.01). The resection of the reassembled human valves demonstrated the same results between the devices regarding resection time (P=0.001) and resected area (P=0.016), but not fragment sizes (P=0.610). Finally, transapical-transcatheter-resection of aortic valve was performed in two cadavers. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter aortic valve resection is feasible with variable aortic leaflet resection times and mild risk of lesions of the surrounding tissue. AME Publishing Company 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7711357/ /pubmed/33282360 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-2036 Text en 2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dai, Huangdong Lutter, Georg Frank, Derk Freitag-Wolf, Sandra Topal, Ayça Haneya, Assad Sathananthan, Janarthanan Puehler, Thomas Transcatheter aortic valve resection: new mechanical devices |
title | Transcatheter aortic valve resection: new mechanical devices |
title_full | Transcatheter aortic valve resection: new mechanical devices |
title_fullStr | Transcatheter aortic valve resection: new mechanical devices |
title_full_unstemmed | Transcatheter aortic valve resection: new mechanical devices |
title_short | Transcatheter aortic valve resection: new mechanical devices |
title_sort | transcatheter aortic valve resection: new mechanical devices |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33282360 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-2036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daihuangdong transcatheteraorticvalveresectionnewmechanicaldevices AT luttergeorg transcatheteraorticvalveresectionnewmechanicaldevices AT frankderk transcatheteraorticvalveresectionnewmechanicaldevices AT freitagwolfsandra transcatheteraorticvalveresectionnewmechanicaldevices AT topalayca transcatheteraorticvalveresectionnewmechanicaldevices AT haneyaassad transcatheteraorticvalveresectionnewmechanicaldevices AT sathananthanjanarthanan transcatheteraorticvalveresectionnewmechanicaldevices AT puehlerthomas transcatheteraorticvalveresectionnewmechanicaldevices |