Cargando…

Outcomes of left internal mammary artery with saphenous vein composite graft to bypass the left anterior descending artery: a propensity-matched study

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the early and mid-term outcomes of a novel strategy of using the in-situ left internal mammary artery (LIMA) with the great saphenous vein graft (SVG) to bypass the left anterior descending artery (LAD) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: A to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Dongjie, Gu, Song, Liu, Yan, Zhang, Xitao, An, Xiangguang, Yan, Jun, Wang, Hong, Guo, Yulin, Su, Pixiong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33282364
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-2358
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the early and mid-term outcomes of a novel strategy of using the in-situ left internal mammary artery (LIMA) with the great saphenous vein graft (SVG) to bypass the left anterior descending artery (LAD) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: A total of 979 patients took part in this retrospective observational study; 83 patients were propensity-score matched to the LIMA + SVG group and 83 to the LIMA − LAD group. Early mortality, postoperative complications, mid-term major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were compared among the two matched groups after the procedure. RESULTS: No significant differences in early mortality and postoperative complications rates were detected between the two matched groups. For mid-term outcomes, the incidence of MACCE was slightly higher in the LIMA + SVG group, but there was no significant statistical difference (14.9% vs. 12.8%, hazard ratio =1.20, 95% CI, 0.24 to 7.95; P=0.70) between the matched groups. Computed tomography coronary artery angiography (CTCA) images showed a LIMA + SVG composite graft patency rate of 94% (32/34) 25 months after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Using the in situ LIMA with SVG to revascularize LAD was associated with comparable early and mid-term outcomes. These findings may provide an alternative emergency strategy when in situ LIMA cannot bypass LAD. Further study needs to be conducted to test longer-term outcomes.