Cargando…

Evaluation of a Home Monitoring Application for Follow Up after Lung Transplantation—A Pilot Study

Home spirometry after lung transplantation is common practice, to monitor graft function. However, there is little experience with online home monitoring applications with direct data transfer to the hospital. We evaluated the feasibility and patient experiences with a new online home monitoring app...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wijbenga, Nynke, Hoek, Rogier A. S., Mathot, Bas J., Seghers, Leonard, van Weezel, Jan J., den Ouden, José, Wijsenbeek, Marlies S., Aerts, Joachim G. J. V., Hellemons, Merel E., Moor, Catharina C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33233334
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm10040240
_version_ 1783618147148890112
author Wijbenga, Nynke
Hoek, Rogier A. S.
Mathot, Bas J.
Seghers, Leonard
van Weezel, Jan J.
den Ouden, José
Wijsenbeek, Marlies S.
Aerts, Joachim G. J. V.
Hellemons, Merel E.
Moor, Catharina C.
author_facet Wijbenga, Nynke
Hoek, Rogier A. S.
Mathot, Bas J.
Seghers, Leonard
van Weezel, Jan J.
den Ouden, José
Wijsenbeek, Marlies S.
Aerts, Joachim G. J. V.
Hellemons, Merel E.
Moor, Catharina C.
author_sort Wijbenga, Nynke
collection PubMed
description Home spirometry after lung transplantation is common practice, to monitor graft function. However, there is little experience with online home monitoring applications with direct data transfer to the hospital. We evaluated the feasibility and patient experiences with a new online home monitoring application, integrated with a Bluetooth-enabled spirometer and real-time data transfer. Consecutive lung transplant recipients were asked to evaluate this home monitoring application for three months in a pilot study. Home spirometry measurements were compared with in-hospital lung function tests (the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC)) at the end of the study. Ten patients participated. The home and hospital spirometry measurements showed a high correlation, for both the FEV1 (r = 0.99, p < 0.01) and FVC (r = 0.99, p < 0.01). The adherence and patient satisfaction were high, and the patients preferred the home monitoring application over the current home spirometer, with a difference of 1.4 ± 1.5 points on a scale from 0 to 10 (p = 0.02). Online home monitoring with direct data transfer is feasible and reliable after lung transplantation and results in high patient satisfaction. Whether the implementation of online home monitoring enables the earlier detection of lung function decline and improves patient and graft outcomes will be the subject of future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7711442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77114422020-12-04 Evaluation of a Home Monitoring Application for Follow Up after Lung Transplantation—A Pilot Study Wijbenga, Nynke Hoek, Rogier A. S. Mathot, Bas J. Seghers, Leonard van Weezel, Jan J. den Ouden, José Wijsenbeek, Marlies S. Aerts, Joachim G. J. V. Hellemons, Merel E. Moor, Catharina C. J Pers Med Article Home spirometry after lung transplantation is common practice, to monitor graft function. However, there is little experience with online home monitoring applications with direct data transfer to the hospital. We evaluated the feasibility and patient experiences with a new online home monitoring application, integrated with a Bluetooth-enabled spirometer and real-time data transfer. Consecutive lung transplant recipients were asked to evaluate this home monitoring application for three months in a pilot study. Home spirometry measurements were compared with in-hospital lung function tests (the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC)) at the end of the study. Ten patients participated. The home and hospital spirometry measurements showed a high correlation, for both the FEV1 (r = 0.99, p < 0.01) and FVC (r = 0.99, p < 0.01). The adherence and patient satisfaction were high, and the patients preferred the home monitoring application over the current home spirometer, with a difference of 1.4 ± 1.5 points on a scale from 0 to 10 (p = 0.02). Online home monitoring with direct data transfer is feasible and reliable after lung transplantation and results in high patient satisfaction. Whether the implementation of online home monitoring enables the earlier detection of lung function decline and improves patient and graft outcomes will be the subject of future research. MDPI 2020-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7711442/ /pubmed/33233334 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm10040240 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wijbenga, Nynke
Hoek, Rogier A. S.
Mathot, Bas J.
Seghers, Leonard
van Weezel, Jan J.
den Ouden, José
Wijsenbeek, Marlies S.
Aerts, Joachim G. J. V.
Hellemons, Merel E.
Moor, Catharina C.
Evaluation of a Home Monitoring Application for Follow Up after Lung Transplantation—A Pilot Study
title Evaluation of a Home Monitoring Application for Follow Up after Lung Transplantation—A Pilot Study
title_full Evaluation of a Home Monitoring Application for Follow Up after Lung Transplantation—A Pilot Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of a Home Monitoring Application for Follow Up after Lung Transplantation—A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a Home Monitoring Application for Follow Up after Lung Transplantation—A Pilot Study
title_short Evaluation of a Home Monitoring Application for Follow Up after Lung Transplantation—A Pilot Study
title_sort evaluation of a home monitoring application for follow up after lung transplantation—a pilot study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33233334
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm10040240
work_keys_str_mv AT wijbenganynke evaluationofahomemonitoringapplicationforfollowupafterlungtransplantationapilotstudy
AT hoekrogieras evaluationofahomemonitoringapplicationforfollowupafterlungtransplantationapilotstudy
AT mathotbasj evaluationofahomemonitoringapplicationforfollowupafterlungtransplantationapilotstudy
AT seghersleonard evaluationofahomemonitoringapplicationforfollowupafterlungtransplantationapilotstudy
AT vanweezeljanj evaluationofahomemonitoringapplicationforfollowupafterlungtransplantationapilotstudy
AT denoudenjose evaluationofahomemonitoringapplicationforfollowupafterlungtransplantationapilotstudy
AT wijsenbeekmarliess evaluationofahomemonitoringapplicationforfollowupafterlungtransplantationapilotstudy
AT aertsjoachimgjv evaluationofahomemonitoringapplicationforfollowupafterlungtransplantationapilotstudy
AT hellemonsmerele evaluationofahomemonitoringapplicationforfollowupafterlungtransplantationapilotstudy
AT moorcatharinac evaluationofahomemonitoringapplicationforfollowupafterlungtransplantationapilotstudy