Cargando…

Mineralization of Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering

Mineralized biomaterials have been demonstrated to enhance bone regeneration compared to their non-mineralized analogs. As non-mineralized scaffolds do not perform as well as mineralized scaffolds in terms of their mechanical and surface properties, osteoconductivity and osteoinductivity, mineraliza...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Xinchen, Walsh, Kierra, Hoff, Brianna L., Camci-Unal, Gulden
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33092121
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7040132
_version_ 1783618160017014784
author Wu, Xinchen
Walsh, Kierra
Hoff, Brianna L.
Camci-Unal, Gulden
author_facet Wu, Xinchen
Walsh, Kierra
Hoff, Brianna L.
Camci-Unal, Gulden
author_sort Wu, Xinchen
collection PubMed
description Mineralized biomaterials have been demonstrated to enhance bone regeneration compared to their non-mineralized analogs. As non-mineralized scaffolds do not perform as well as mineralized scaffolds in terms of their mechanical and surface properties, osteoconductivity and osteoinductivity, mineralization strategies are promising methods in the development of functional biomimetic bone scaffolds. In particular, the mineralization of three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds has become a promising approach for guided bone regeneration. In this paper, we review the major approaches used for mineralizing tissue engineering constructs. The resulting scaffolds provide minerals chemically similar to the inorganic component of natural bone, carbonated apatite, Ca(5)(PO(4),CO(3))(3)(OH). In addition, we discuss the characterization techniques that are used to characterize the mineralized scaffolds, such as the degree of mineralization, surface characteristics, mechanical properties of the scaffolds, and the chemical composition of the deposited minerals. In vitro cell culture studies show that the mineralized scaffolds are highly osteoinductive. We also summarize, based on literature examples, the applications of 3D mineralized constructs, as well as the rationale behind their use. The mineralized scaffolds have improved bone regeneration in animal models due to the enhanced mechanical properties and cell recruitment capability making them a preferable option for bone tissue engineering over non-mineralized scaffolds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7711498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77114982020-12-04 Mineralization of Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering Wu, Xinchen Walsh, Kierra Hoff, Brianna L. Camci-Unal, Gulden Bioengineering (Basel) Review Mineralized biomaterials have been demonstrated to enhance bone regeneration compared to their non-mineralized analogs. As non-mineralized scaffolds do not perform as well as mineralized scaffolds in terms of their mechanical and surface properties, osteoconductivity and osteoinductivity, mineralization strategies are promising methods in the development of functional biomimetic bone scaffolds. In particular, the mineralization of three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds has become a promising approach for guided bone regeneration. In this paper, we review the major approaches used for mineralizing tissue engineering constructs. The resulting scaffolds provide minerals chemically similar to the inorganic component of natural bone, carbonated apatite, Ca(5)(PO(4),CO(3))(3)(OH). In addition, we discuss the characterization techniques that are used to characterize the mineralized scaffolds, such as the degree of mineralization, surface characteristics, mechanical properties of the scaffolds, and the chemical composition of the deposited minerals. In vitro cell culture studies show that the mineralized scaffolds are highly osteoinductive. We also summarize, based on literature examples, the applications of 3D mineralized constructs, as well as the rationale behind their use. The mineralized scaffolds have improved bone regeneration in animal models due to the enhanced mechanical properties and cell recruitment capability making them a preferable option for bone tissue engineering over non-mineralized scaffolds. MDPI 2020-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7711498/ /pubmed/33092121 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7040132 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Wu, Xinchen
Walsh, Kierra
Hoff, Brianna L.
Camci-Unal, Gulden
Mineralization of Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering
title Mineralization of Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering
title_full Mineralization of Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering
title_fullStr Mineralization of Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering
title_full_unstemmed Mineralization of Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering
title_short Mineralization of Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering
title_sort mineralization of biomaterials for bone tissue engineering
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33092121
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7040132
work_keys_str_mv AT wuxinchen mineralizationofbiomaterialsforbonetissueengineering
AT walshkierra mineralizationofbiomaterialsforbonetissueengineering
AT hoffbriannal mineralizationofbiomaterialsforbonetissueengineering
AT camciunalgulden mineralizationofbiomaterialsforbonetissueengineering