Cargando…

The Evidence-Based Practice Silent Enemy: Retracted Articles and Their Use in Systematic Reviews

Today, evidence-based nursing practice strives to improve health care, ensure adherence to treatment, improve health outcomes, and guarantee patient safety. The main scientific documents that nurses should consult, to obtain the best possible evidence, are systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Howev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herrera-Peco, Ivan, Santillán-García, Azucena, Morán, José María, Goodman-Casanova, Jessica Marian, Cuesta-Lozano, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33172213
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8040465
Descripción
Sumario:Today, evidence-based nursing practice strives to improve health care, ensure adherence to treatment, improve health outcomes, and guarantee patient safety. The main scientific documents that nurses should consult, to obtain the best possible evidence, are systematic reviews and meta-analyses. However, this type of scientific document has a major issue if it uses retracted articles that could directly affect the consistency of the results shown in the reviews. The aim of this commentary is to present the current issue represented by the use of retracted articles in meta-analyses of systematic reviews and how researchers could detect them, through the use of different instruments, avoiding them, and providing a reliable SR or meta-analysis that could be useful for day-to-day clinical and research activities.