Cargando…
KID Procedure Applied on the [(PY(5)Me(2))MoO](+) Complex
[Image: see text] The KID (Koopmans in DFT) protocol usually applies in organic molecules of the closed-shell type. We used the KID procedure on an open-shell Mo-based system for the first time to choose the most suitable density functional to compute global and local reactivity descriptors obtained...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33283103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c04450 |
_version_ | 1783618205845028864 |
---|---|
author | Glossman-Mitnik, Daniel Martínez-Araya, Jorge I. |
author_facet | Glossman-Mitnik, Daniel Martínez-Araya, Jorge I. |
author_sort | Glossman-Mitnik, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] The KID (Koopmans in DFT) protocol usually applies in organic molecules of the closed-shell type. We used the KID procedure on an open-shell Mo-based system for the first time to choose the most suitable density functional to compute global and local reactivity descriptors obtained from the conceptual density-functional theory (DFT). From a set of 18 density functionals, spread from the second until the fourth rung of Jacob’s ladder: BLYP, BP86, B97-D, MN12-L, MN15-L, M06-L, M11-L, CAM-B3LYP, PBE0, B3LYP, N12-SX, M06-2X, MN15, MN12-SX, ωB97X-D, M11, LC-ωHPBE, and APFD, we concluded that CAM-B3LYP provides the best outcome, and in the second place, M06-2X. Because the vertical first ionization potential and vertical first electron affinity in the ground state (gs) are defined as follows I = E(gs)(N – 1) – E(gs)(N) and A = E(gs)(N) – E(gs)(N + 1), where E(gs)(N – 1), E(gs)(N), and E(gs)(N + 1) correspond to energies of the system bearing N, N + 1, and N – 1 electrons, along with Koopmans’ theorem (KT) given by I ≈ −ε(HOMO) (ε(HOMO), highest occupied molecular orbital energy) and A ≈ −ε(LUMO) (ε(LUMO), lowest unoccupied molecular orbital energy), the deviation from the KT was performed by the use of the [Image: see text] index, such that J(I) = |E(gs)(N – 1) – E(gs)(N) + ε(HOMO)| and J(A) = |E(gs)(N) – E(gs)(N + 1) + ε(LUMO)|, which are absolute deviations from the perspective of I and A, respectively. Furthermore, the ε(SOMO) (SOMO: singly-occupied molecular orbital energy) leads us to another index given by |ΔSL| = |ε(SOMO) – ε(LUMO)|. Therefore, J(HL) and |ΔSL| are indexes defined to evaluate the quality of the KT when employed within the context of quantum chemical calculations based on DFT and not the Hartree–Fock theory. We propose the [Image: see text] index that could be more suitable to choose the most proper density functional because the J(HL) and |ΔSL| are independent indexes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7711706 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77117062020-12-04 KID Procedure Applied on the [(PY(5)Me(2))MoO](+) Complex Glossman-Mitnik, Daniel Martínez-Araya, Jorge I. ACS Omega [Image: see text] The KID (Koopmans in DFT) protocol usually applies in organic molecules of the closed-shell type. We used the KID procedure on an open-shell Mo-based system for the first time to choose the most suitable density functional to compute global and local reactivity descriptors obtained from the conceptual density-functional theory (DFT). From a set of 18 density functionals, spread from the second until the fourth rung of Jacob’s ladder: BLYP, BP86, B97-D, MN12-L, MN15-L, M06-L, M11-L, CAM-B3LYP, PBE0, B3LYP, N12-SX, M06-2X, MN15, MN12-SX, ωB97X-D, M11, LC-ωHPBE, and APFD, we concluded that CAM-B3LYP provides the best outcome, and in the second place, M06-2X. Because the vertical first ionization potential and vertical first electron affinity in the ground state (gs) are defined as follows I = E(gs)(N – 1) – E(gs)(N) and A = E(gs)(N) – E(gs)(N + 1), where E(gs)(N – 1), E(gs)(N), and E(gs)(N + 1) correspond to energies of the system bearing N, N + 1, and N – 1 electrons, along with Koopmans’ theorem (KT) given by I ≈ −ε(HOMO) (ε(HOMO), highest occupied molecular orbital energy) and A ≈ −ε(LUMO) (ε(LUMO), lowest unoccupied molecular orbital energy), the deviation from the KT was performed by the use of the [Image: see text] index, such that J(I) = |E(gs)(N – 1) – E(gs)(N) + ε(HOMO)| and J(A) = |E(gs)(N) – E(gs)(N + 1) + ε(LUMO)|, which are absolute deviations from the perspective of I and A, respectively. Furthermore, the ε(SOMO) (SOMO: singly-occupied molecular orbital energy) leads us to another index given by |ΔSL| = |ε(SOMO) – ε(LUMO)|. Therefore, J(HL) and |ΔSL| are indexes defined to evaluate the quality of the KT when employed within the context of quantum chemical calculations based on DFT and not the Hartree–Fock theory. We propose the [Image: see text] index that could be more suitable to choose the most proper density functional because the J(HL) and |ΔSL| are independent indexes. American Chemical Society 2020-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7711706/ /pubmed/33283103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c04450 Text en © 2020 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Glossman-Mitnik, Daniel Martínez-Araya, Jorge I. KID Procedure Applied on the [(PY(5)Me(2))MoO](+) Complex |
title | KID Procedure Applied on the [(PY(5)Me(2))MoO](+) Complex |
title_full | KID Procedure Applied on the [(PY(5)Me(2))MoO](+) Complex |
title_fullStr | KID Procedure Applied on the [(PY(5)Me(2))MoO](+) Complex |
title_full_unstemmed | KID Procedure Applied on the [(PY(5)Me(2))MoO](+) Complex |
title_short | KID Procedure Applied on the [(PY(5)Me(2))MoO](+) Complex |
title_sort | kid procedure applied on the [(py(5)me(2))moo](+) complex |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33283103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c04450 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT glossmanmitnikdaniel kidprocedureappliedonthepy5me2moocomplex AT martinezarayajorgei kidprocedureappliedonthepy5me2moocomplex |