Cargando…

What is most appropriate number of repetitions of the sit-to-stand test in older adults: a reliability study

The most frequently employed versions of the sit-to-stand test (STST) are the 5 times STSΤ and the 30 seconds STST. However, it is not known whether a variation with different number of repetitions or time could be more appropriate for older adults. The objective of this study was to investigate the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsekoura, Maria, Anastasopoulos, Konstantinos, Kastrinis, Alexandros, Dimitriadis, Zacharias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: HYLONOME PUBLICATIONS 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33283077
http://dx.doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-05-109
_version_ 1783618211395141632
author Tsekoura, Maria
Anastasopoulos, Konstantinos
Kastrinis, Alexandros
Dimitriadis, Zacharias
author_facet Tsekoura, Maria
Anastasopoulos, Konstantinos
Kastrinis, Alexandros
Dimitriadis, Zacharias
author_sort Tsekoura, Maria
collection PubMed
description The most frequently employed versions of the sit-to-stand test (STST) are the 5 times STSΤ and the 30 seconds STST. However, it is not known whether a variation with different number of repetitions or time could be more appropriate for older adults. The objective of this study was to investigate the reliability of STST at different time points and number of repetitions. The test was performed in 33 older adults (73±6.1 years) for 40 seconds. The participants performed the procedure twice with a day interval between the sessions. The test was video-taped and the data were processed by two examiners. The highest test-retest reliability was found for the 4(th) (ICC=0.73, SEM=1.48, SDD=1.68), 5(th) (ICC=0.76, SEM=1.73, SDD=1.97) and 6(th) repetition (ICC=0.78, SEM=1.78, SDD=2.03). The inter-rater reliability was excellent independently of the number of trials (ICC>0.9). The correlation of the time at the 4(th) and 6(th) repetition with the time at the traditionally selected 5(th) repetition was excellent (r>0.9). The termination of the STST at the 4(th) repetition seems to provide equally reliable and valid estimations with the termination at the 5(th) repetition. Future studies should examine a 4 times STST since the reduction of the number of repetitions may be less tiring and safer for older adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7711732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher HYLONOME PUBLICATIONS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77117322020-12-03 What is most appropriate number of repetitions of the sit-to-stand test in older adults: a reliability study Tsekoura, Maria Anastasopoulos, Konstantinos Kastrinis, Alexandros Dimitriadis, Zacharias J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls Short Communication The most frequently employed versions of the sit-to-stand test (STST) are the 5 times STSΤ and the 30 seconds STST. However, it is not known whether a variation with different number of repetitions or time could be more appropriate for older adults. The objective of this study was to investigate the reliability of STST at different time points and number of repetitions. The test was performed in 33 older adults (73±6.1 years) for 40 seconds. The participants performed the procedure twice with a day interval between the sessions. The test was video-taped and the data were processed by two examiners. The highest test-retest reliability was found for the 4(th) (ICC=0.73, SEM=1.48, SDD=1.68), 5(th) (ICC=0.76, SEM=1.73, SDD=1.97) and 6(th) repetition (ICC=0.78, SEM=1.78, SDD=2.03). The inter-rater reliability was excellent independently of the number of trials (ICC>0.9). The correlation of the time at the 4(th) and 6(th) repetition with the time at the traditionally selected 5(th) repetition was excellent (r>0.9). The termination of the STST at the 4(th) repetition seems to provide equally reliable and valid estimations with the termination at the 5(th) repetition. Future studies should examine a 4 times STST since the reduction of the number of repetitions may be less tiring and safer for older adults. HYLONOME PUBLICATIONS 2020-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7711732/ /pubmed/33283077 http://dx.doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-05-109 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Hylonome Publications http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 All published work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial - ShareAlike 4.0 International
spellingShingle Short Communication
Tsekoura, Maria
Anastasopoulos, Konstantinos
Kastrinis, Alexandros
Dimitriadis, Zacharias
What is most appropriate number of repetitions of the sit-to-stand test in older adults: a reliability study
title What is most appropriate number of repetitions of the sit-to-stand test in older adults: a reliability study
title_full What is most appropriate number of repetitions of the sit-to-stand test in older adults: a reliability study
title_fullStr What is most appropriate number of repetitions of the sit-to-stand test in older adults: a reliability study
title_full_unstemmed What is most appropriate number of repetitions of the sit-to-stand test in older adults: a reliability study
title_short What is most appropriate number of repetitions of the sit-to-stand test in older adults: a reliability study
title_sort what is most appropriate number of repetitions of the sit-to-stand test in older adults: a reliability study
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33283077
http://dx.doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-05-109
work_keys_str_mv AT tsekouramaria whatismostappropriatenumberofrepetitionsofthesittostandtestinolderadultsareliabilitystudy
AT anastasopouloskonstantinos whatismostappropriatenumberofrepetitionsofthesittostandtestinolderadultsareliabilitystudy
AT kastrinisalexandros whatismostappropriatenumberofrepetitionsofthesittostandtestinolderadultsareliabilitystudy
AT dimitriadiszacharias whatismostappropriatenumberofrepetitionsofthesittostandtestinolderadultsareliabilitystudy