Cargando…
Deterrence, Resilience, and the Shooting Down of Flight MH17
Russian disinformation has thus far proven to be unconvincing for most Dutch target audiences. This is the conclusion of the present chapter. Information and disinformation have become effective weapons in international politics. This is part of a development where the weapons and concepts used in d...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711746/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-419-8_19 |
_version_ | 1783618213083348992 |
---|---|
author | van Doorn, Cees Brinkel, Theo |
author_facet | van Doorn, Cees Brinkel, Theo |
author_sort | van Doorn, Cees |
collection | PubMed |
description | Russian disinformation has thus far proven to be unconvincing for most Dutch target audiences. This is the conclusion of the present chapter. Information and disinformation have become effective weapons in international politics. This is part of a development where the weapons and concepts used in deterrence strategies have moved away from the military domain toward the political, economic, humanitarian, and communicative ones. In western literature, this is called hybrid warfare. In recent literature on hybrid warfare, resilience is often considered a key theme which may boost deterrence against hybrid activities and/or lower their impact. Most research on resilience and security is focused on infrastructure and resource planning. In this chapter, however, we attempt to ascertain how the existence of resilience in society can be observed. By looking at the case of the Dutch reaction to the shooting down of flight MH17, we hope to illustrate how resilience works in deterrence to hybrid warfare. We try to establish how subversive Russian activities were taking place and what measures were taken by the Netherlands government in order to counteract them. We monitored societal resilience by looking for the presence of trust, social capital, and credible narratives in reaction to disinformation activities after a disruptive event. All these elements appeared to be present in the MH17 case. Overall, we conclude, the handling of the MH17 case has reinforced deterrence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7711746 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77117462020-12-04 Deterrence, Resilience, and the Shooting Down of Flight MH17 van Doorn, Cees Brinkel, Theo NL ARMS Netherlands Annual Review of Military Studies 2020 Article Russian disinformation has thus far proven to be unconvincing for most Dutch target audiences. This is the conclusion of the present chapter. Information and disinformation have become effective weapons in international politics. This is part of a development where the weapons and concepts used in deterrence strategies have moved away from the military domain toward the political, economic, humanitarian, and communicative ones. In western literature, this is called hybrid warfare. In recent literature on hybrid warfare, resilience is often considered a key theme which may boost deterrence against hybrid activities and/or lower their impact. Most research on resilience and security is focused on infrastructure and resource planning. In this chapter, however, we attempt to ascertain how the existence of resilience in society can be observed. By looking at the case of the Dutch reaction to the shooting down of flight MH17, we hope to illustrate how resilience works in deterrence to hybrid warfare. We try to establish how subversive Russian activities were taking place and what measures were taken by the Netherlands government in order to counteract them. We monitored societal resilience by looking for the presence of trust, social capital, and credible narratives in reaction to disinformation activities after a disruptive event. All these elements appeared to be present in the MH17 case. Overall, we conclude, the handling of the MH17 case has reinforced deterrence. 2014-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7711746/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-419-8_19 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. |
spellingShingle | Article van Doorn, Cees Brinkel, Theo Deterrence, Resilience, and the Shooting Down of Flight MH17 |
title | Deterrence, Resilience, and the Shooting Down of Flight MH17 |
title_full | Deterrence, Resilience, and the Shooting Down of Flight MH17 |
title_fullStr | Deterrence, Resilience, and the Shooting Down of Flight MH17 |
title_full_unstemmed | Deterrence, Resilience, and the Shooting Down of Flight MH17 |
title_short | Deterrence, Resilience, and the Shooting Down of Flight MH17 |
title_sort | deterrence, resilience, and the shooting down of flight mh17 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711746/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-419-8_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandoorncees deterrenceresilienceandtheshootingdownofflightmh17 AT brinkeltheo deterrenceresilienceandtheshootingdownofflightmh17 |