Cargando…

Deterrence, Resilience, and the Shooting Down of Flight MH17

Russian disinformation has thus far proven to be unconvincing for most Dutch target audiences. This is the conclusion of the present chapter. Information and disinformation have become effective weapons in international politics. This is part of a development where the weapons and concepts used in d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Doorn, Cees, Brinkel, Theo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711746/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-419-8_19
_version_ 1783618213083348992
author van Doorn, Cees
Brinkel, Theo
author_facet van Doorn, Cees
Brinkel, Theo
author_sort van Doorn, Cees
collection PubMed
description Russian disinformation has thus far proven to be unconvincing for most Dutch target audiences. This is the conclusion of the present chapter. Information and disinformation have become effective weapons in international politics. This is part of a development where the weapons and concepts used in deterrence strategies have moved away from the military domain toward the political, economic, humanitarian, and communicative ones. In western literature, this is called hybrid warfare. In recent literature on hybrid warfare, resilience is often considered a key theme which may boost deterrence against hybrid activities and/or lower their impact. Most research on resilience and security is focused on infrastructure and resource planning. In this chapter, however, we attempt to ascertain how the existence of resilience in society can be observed. By looking at the case of the Dutch reaction to the shooting down of flight MH17, we hope to illustrate how resilience works in deterrence to hybrid warfare. We try to establish how subversive Russian activities were taking place and what measures were taken by the Netherlands government in order to counteract them. We monitored societal resilience by looking for the presence of trust, social capital, and credible narratives in reaction to disinformation activities after a disruptive event. All these elements appeared to be present in the MH17 case. Overall, we conclude, the handling of the MH17 case has reinforced deterrence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7711746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77117462020-12-04 Deterrence, Resilience, and the Shooting Down of Flight MH17 van Doorn, Cees Brinkel, Theo NL ARMS Netherlands Annual Review of Military Studies 2020 Article Russian disinformation has thus far proven to be unconvincing for most Dutch target audiences. This is the conclusion of the present chapter. Information and disinformation have become effective weapons in international politics. This is part of a development where the weapons and concepts used in deterrence strategies have moved away from the military domain toward the political, economic, humanitarian, and communicative ones. In western literature, this is called hybrid warfare. In recent literature on hybrid warfare, resilience is often considered a key theme which may boost deterrence against hybrid activities and/or lower their impact. Most research on resilience and security is focused on infrastructure and resource planning. In this chapter, however, we attempt to ascertain how the existence of resilience in society can be observed. By looking at the case of the Dutch reaction to the shooting down of flight MH17, we hope to illustrate how resilience works in deterrence to hybrid warfare. We try to establish how subversive Russian activities were taking place and what measures were taken by the Netherlands government in order to counteract them. We monitored societal resilience by looking for the presence of trust, social capital, and credible narratives in reaction to disinformation activities after a disruptive event. All these elements appeared to be present in the MH17 case. Overall, we conclude, the handling of the MH17 case has reinforced deterrence. 2014-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7711746/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-419-8_19 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
spellingShingle Article
van Doorn, Cees
Brinkel, Theo
Deterrence, Resilience, and the Shooting Down of Flight MH17
title Deterrence, Resilience, and the Shooting Down of Flight MH17
title_full Deterrence, Resilience, and the Shooting Down of Flight MH17
title_fullStr Deterrence, Resilience, and the Shooting Down of Flight MH17
title_full_unstemmed Deterrence, Resilience, and the Shooting Down of Flight MH17
title_short Deterrence, Resilience, and the Shooting Down of Flight MH17
title_sort deterrence, resilience, and the shooting down of flight mh17
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711746/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-419-8_19
work_keys_str_mv AT vandoorncees deterrenceresilienceandtheshootingdownofflightmh17
AT brinkeltheo deterrenceresilienceandtheshootingdownofflightmh17